preview

How Did Giles Corey Change In The Crucible

Decent Essays

Georg Christoph Lichtenberg once said “I cannot say whether things will get better if we change; what I can say is that they must change if they are to get better.” This is exactly what Giles Corey, John Proctor and Reverend Hale were trying to do, bring change so things would get better. In Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible, a group of girls began to accuse every honorable person in town of witchcraft. The witchcraft trials went so far as to hang nineteen innocent people, all because the girls said they were witches. There were three honorable people, Giles Corey, John Proctor and Reverend Hale who spoke up about the social injustices, but they were too late. These characters impacted the overall outcome of the Salem witchcraft trials, but it did not put a stop to them. Giles Corey tried to speak out and stop the trials, but was evidently “pressed” to death after not giving up names of other people wanting it to stop (1226). Giles was primarily focused on the stopping of witchcraft in the beginning of the play, he even hinted at the fact his wife may be using witchcraft. “It discomfits me! Last night - mark this - I tried and tried and could not …show more content…

And then she close her book and walks out of the house, and suddenly - mark this - I could pray again (1151). This was the way he was trying to stop witchcraft at first, but then realized the social injustice it was causing. Giles Corey was successful, to an extent, in bringing people to notice the social injustice of the hangings. He brought a list to the court with signatures of townspeople who thought the girls were lying, this contributed with Reverend Hale and his opinion about the lies, and Danforth made sure to questions the girls more intently. The result of this, although, was not successful because Abigail was able to convince Danforth of Mary Warren using

Get Access