How Did Hitler Kill The Jews

The holocaust was established by hitler to execute even more jews. About 6 million jews lost their lives during the holocaust. German authorities targeted groups that had a different racial inferiority. During world war II the germans went by the “final solution” a policy to murder all jews. The holocaust was a big shock for the jews. This dramatic experience still haunt the streets of germany.

However, Dawidowicz published The War against the Jews in 1975, she like other Intentionalist historians advocated that ‘Jews were at the centre of his mental world and formed an inseparable core of National Socialist doctrine’. In relation to the Nazi bureaucracy she claimed that Hitler had a wide range of long term plans and one of them involved deliberately creating chaos and instability within the party structure. And, that he formed a structure where people would have to fight for survival within the intentionally formed bureaucratic structure.

While Hitler was the leader of the Third Reich, the functionalists believed that the ‘road to Auschwitz’ was characterized by an indirect unplanned path that was defined by cumulative radicalization of the Nazis due to the prevalence of chaotic decision-making processes that were a major feature of the polycratic system of governance. Additionally, this system was characterized by the elimination of individuals considered as destructive to the Nazi movement, leading to the creation of a movement that was ready to do anything to achieve a ‘final solution’ to the ‘Jew problem’. Karl Schleunes falls in this school of thought. Karl Schleunes argument, like that of other functionalists, was cemented on institutions and structure of the Third Reich. With the intentionalists arguing that the Holocaust was the fulfillment of Hitler’s plan hatched in the 1920s, their argument was summer up as the ‘straight road to Auschwitz.’ For functionalists, however, the path to the Holocaust was not straight, a reason why Karl Schleunes labeled his book The Twisted Road to

Hitler 1936-1945: Nemesis is an encycladeopaedic biography of Hitler in the years 1936-1945. This source originated from Ian Kershaw, who became interested in the Third Reich in his later life. (It was published by W. W. Norton & Company on 17 October 2000.) Ian Kershaw is a British historian whose 20th century work has been considered a large contribution to historical works, due to his extensive publishing’s on Hitler. The purpose of this biography was to inform the audience on extent of the trauma that Hitler had caused. This includes the period of the Cold War, new wars in Europe and also the Holocaust which Kershaw addresses as a “question of genocide”. The other purpose of the source was to prove that the structure of the Nazi state was a main reason of the outcome of Nazi Germany (being regarded as a totalitarian state), not just Hitler himself. Kershaw believed that Germany was ultimately comprised an unstable coalition of several blocs in a "power cartel". The value of this source is that he uses a large range of evidence to back up his claims, such as the recently available Russian archives and Hitler’s recent speeches. The limitation of this source is

that Hitler wanted to eliminate the Jews before anything else. Hitler firmly blamed all of the bad things on the Jews, and wanted to exterminate them as a whole. Dawidowicz states, “The mass murder of the Jews was the consummation of his fundamental beliefs and ideological convictions” (Dawidowicz, The War against the Jews, 3). She expresses the idea that Hitler was taking place in early anti-Semitism,

Of the four historians, it is Kershaw, Goldhagen, and Peukert who propose the idea that the holocaust was a long-term plan and Berghahn who argues that it was a reaction to the circumstances brought about by expansion during world war two. All of the historians agree to a certain degree that the extermination of the Jewish people from Germany was a long term idea of Hitler’s, but it is at the point where ‘idea’ becomes ‘plan’ that they differ.

The debate as to whether Hitler was a ‘weak dictator’ or ‘Master of the Third Reich’ is one that has been contested by historians of Nazi Germany for many years and lies at the centre of the Intentionalist – Structuralist debate. On the one hand, historians such as Bullock, Bracher, Jackel and Hildebrand regard Hitler’s personality, ideology and will as the central locomotive in the Third Reich. Others, such as Broszat, Mason and Mommsen argue that the regime evolved out from pressures and circumstances rather than from Hitler’s intentions. They emphasise the institutional anarchy of the regime as being the result of Hitler’s ‘weak’ leadership. The most convincing standpoint is the

Historians are often divided into categories in regard to dealing with Nazi Germany foreign policy and its relation to Hitler: 'intentionalist', and 'structuralist'. The intentionalist interpretation focuses on Hitler's own steerage of Nazi foreign policy in accordance with a clear, concise 'programme' planned long in advance. The 'structuralist' approach puts forth the idea that Hitler seized opportunities as they came, radicalizing the foreign policies of the Nazi regime in response. Structuralists reject the idea of a specific Hitlerian ideological 'programme', and instead argue for an emphasis on expansion no clear aims or objectives, and radicalized with the dynamism of the Nazi movement. With Nazi ideology and circumstances in

During the time of the holocaust, Hitler was one that had the most power during this time. In the memoir, Night, Wiesel states, “I have more faith in Hitler than anyone else. He alone has kept his promise, all his promises, to the Jews” (Wiesel 81). Hitler had made a promise to annihilate all Jews before the clock was to strike twelve. This shows that ... Hitler was a man of great power, who showed nothing more than mortality. In addition, Hitler would state his proposition of what he was planning on doing to the Jews and those taken into the concentration camp.

Now that you know the basic story of what is said to have happend I'm going to go over what some people believe actually happend and the evidence. The theory goes that he did not kill himself instead Hitler and his wife escaped and moved to Argentina.

Functionalism versus intentionalism is an ongoing historical debate about the origins of the Holocaust. The two questions that the debate centers around on are; was there a master plan by Adolf Hitler for the holocaust? The intentionalist argument is that there was a ‘master plan’, while functionalist’s ague that there was not. The second question is whether the initiative for the Holocaust and the Final Solution come from Adolf Hitler himself, or from lower ranks in the Third Reich. Both side agree that Hitler was the supreme leader, and was responsible for encouraging the anti-Semitism during the Holocaust, but intentionalists believe that the initiative for the final solution came from above, while functionalists argue that it came from the lower ranks within the bureaucracy.

When it comes to interpreting the Final Solution, there are two main schools of thought that provide different explanations for how and why National Socialist Germany killed millions of Jews. The first interpretation is the functionalist view, which explains the Final Solution as something that came about by the chaotic and anarchical nature of the Nazi state. It places much importance on improvisation and radicalization. While acknowledging that Hitler played a key role, this view sees Hitler’s role as “a mobilizing and integrating agent”. The second interpretation is the intentionalist view, which explains the Final Solution as something that was planned and organized by Hitler. Placing emphasis on the “coherent and consistent ideology implemented through an all-powerful totalitarian dictatorship” is vital to this view. Of the two different interpretations, it seems that the intentionalist interpretation of the Final Solution provides a more convincing explanation for how and why National Socialist Germany killed millions of Jews. The combination of Hitler’s racial ideologies and the Second World War provided the motivation and the means to execute his plan to murder millions of Jewish people.

Adolf Hitler was born April 20,1889 in the upper Austrian border town Braunau am Inn located 65 miles east of Munich and 30 miles north of Salzburg.Adolf Hitler was a catholic his father Alois Hitler who married Maria Anna Schicklgruber Hitler's grandpa was a jewish person.What made Hitler so certain that jewish people were causing problems with the money in Germany?Why did he do this?Hitler experienced true poverty when his parents past away because he refused to go with any family members.The first thing that influenced Hitler to be like this was the German racist nationalism by the Upper Austrian Pan-German politician Georg Von Schonerer.The second factor that influenced Hitler was the influence of Karl Lueger,Mayor of Karl Lueger,Mayor

The shocking and depressing events of World War II. Why was all of these awful things done to all of the jewish people. Once the news was said that Adolf Hitler was doing this to such innocent people the world became very angry and some people did as much as they possibly could to save as many lives as possible. As anger grew world wide so much corruption began to happen, wanting to know just why did Hitler do this. After so many lives were taken by these evil people who truly did nothing to stop it, but now wish they world have stopped and now it is such a big part of today’s history.

However, if one takes into account the functionalist approach in interpreting the decision to exterminate European Jews it can be argued that no such decision was made by Hitler. This is supported by Hans Mommsen who took the approach that the Führer had given no order and held no longstanding intention for annihilation. This argument is plausible particularly if one considers that such an order would have compromised the mobilisation of labour provided by Jews to meet the demands of the war economy. Therefore, this suggests that Hitler did not give an order for extermination and the Final solution emerged from improvisation. This is particularly because, as Mommsen argued, this did not mean that Hitler was unaware of what was taking place