How Did Jay Wilds Kill Hae

Firstly, the Nisha call placed Adnan with Jay after the murder. This call could have been a butt-dial that rang for 2 minutes. The call could have been from Adnan, who wanted to make Jay talk with Nisha. The Nisha call does not prove Adnan killed Hae, as it simply just puts him with Jay at the time. Also, the prosecution stated that Adnan was constantly doing bad things. Everyone does bad things, but it does not make them murderers. Finally, Jay knew the location of Hae’s car. The fact that Jay knew the location of Hae’s car should arouse suspicion on him. The evidence utilized by the prosecution is circumstantial and can be disproved, and the lack of strong evidence proves Adnan’s

We believe that Jay is guilty. In the next five minutes we will prove to you that Adnan is in fact innocent and why Jay should be in jail. Adnan was close friends with Jay’s girlfriend Stephanie which is what we believe Jay’s motive was to murder Hae. The court convicted Adnan of the murder with the motive of being jealous of Hae’s new relationship. We argue that the motive of jealousy was what made Jay kill Hae Min Lee.

When somebody is convicted of a crime, most people automatically assume that the person actually committed the misdeed. People also ask this question, what if they didn’t commit the crime? That’s the question in Serial, a podcast narrated by Sarah Keonig. In 1999, a girl was found dead and her ex-boyfriend, Adnan, was turned in to the police by his best friend for murdering his ex-girlfriend. There has been evidence and memories that was used in against and in support of Adnan. So, will anybody ever find out who committed the crime? Well, in this podcast, it has strong evidence that Adnan is guilty of murdering his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee.

The world we live in today is not the same as it was in 1999 when a high school teenage girl disappeared on January 13th, 1999 in Baltimore County. Hae was supposed to pick up her little cousin from kindergarten on the day she went missing but never showed up. This raised suspicion because she was known to be very responsible. Hae-Min Lee’s body was found six weeks later on February 9th in a park not too far from Woodlawn High School where she attended. Hae's ex-boyfriend Adnan Syed became the prime suspect in her murder and has been in prison ever since. Sarah Koenig re-investigates the trial upon Adnan's friend's request Rabia who strongly believes Adnan is innocent. The State does not have enough evidence to prove Adnan was guilty because

I’ve started to wonder if Jay has a bigger part of Hae Min Lee’s murder. Jay seems to be constantly inconsistent with his story. I think it’s important to look at Jay’s relationship with his girlfriend, Stephanie Mcpherson. Stephanie is an extremely close friend to Adnan.

Good people are not always rewarded, and people who commit felonies and do wrong are not always punished. Imagine a man who tries to be nice, honest, and friendly. One night police end up at your door and you are suddenly the suspect for your friends’ murder. This is sadly the case for James Driskell (Howe). In September of 1990 his friend, Perry Harder, was shot in the chest several times. A year later James was convicted to a lifetime in prison. The evidence the police had for the crime were 3 hairs on Harder’s chest that apparently belonged to Mr. Driskell. Later tests revealed that those 3 hairs did not

February 9, 1999 is when something horrible happened the day they found the body of Hae Min Lee a high school student preparing to go to college and her whole life ahead of her, but why did Adnan Syed kill Hae? A girl name Hae Min Lee went missing January 13, 1999 and was found murdered February 9, 1999 and her ex-boyfriend was arrested for the murder of Hae. I think that Adnan Syed is guilty for Hae Min lee Murder.

There are many contradictions in Adnan’s trial, Jay’s testimony, Adnan’s account of what happened, and the state’s case. The state relied heavily on Jay’s testimony. “We left the mall. I took him to school.

The podcast Serial, hosted by Sarah Koenig, follows the riveting murder mystery of Hae Min Lee, a senior at Woodlawn High School who was admired by many. The prime suspect was her ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed, with whom she had broken up prior to her death. Throughout the series, Koenig analyzed court transcripts and investigated the prosecution’s evidence in order to determine whether or not Syed’s incarceration was justified. Due to the absence of firm evidence and the numerous inconsistencies in the state’s allegations, Adnan Syed is not guilty in the murder of his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee.

Adnan was a caring and loved person until he made something that ruined his reputation. Upon this essay, I’ll guide you to the things we’ll be covering, Adnan’s Prom Night and the investigations. Adnan and Jay were close friends, so Jay decided to pitch in and help. As a rule, anyone who kills without having any evidence to prove them guilty is most likely to go to jail. But someone who has evidence and didn’t kill someone is most likely to have a chance on escaping from cuffs, such as what Jay did.

What would you do if a convicted criminal’s guilt was being questioned? Would you have the urge to let your inner detective shine? If you are one of those people, the perplexity of this murder would be right up your alley. On January 13, 1999, in Baltimore, Maryland, 18-year old high school senior Hae Min Lee mysteriously disappeared after school, leaving her family and friends worried. Weeks later, on February 9, 1999, the innocent young woman’s body was found buried in Leakin Park. Many people, including the whole state of Maryland, pointed fingers at Adnan Syed. Syed comes from a traditional Muslim family, yet he did “American teen-like” things, such as dating and going to

On the other hand, Koenig begins her investigation with the belief that Syed’s defense lawyer is corrupt. Koenig was informed along with the request by Chaudry to investigate the state’s case, that Syed’s defense lawyer was the same lawyer who Koenig wrote about in the Baltimore Sun after he was disbarred from law for mishandling client’s money, and therefore Koenig was suspicious of Syed’s defense lawyer. Koenig explains this in her introduction: “Rabia was writing to me because, way back when, I used to be a reporter for the Baltimore Sun, and she'd come across some stories I'd written about a well-known defense attorney in Baltimore who'd been disbarred for mishandling client money. That attorney was the same person who defended Adnan, her

The Corruption of Eyewitness Testimonies In 1993, three young boys from in West Memphis, Arkansas, were brutally murdered and mutilated. As a result of the town being in shock, they were quick to point fingers and falsely accuse “outcast” civilians as suspect. Damien Echols was sentenced to death, Jessie Misskelly Jr. was sentenced to life imprisonment plus two 20-year sentences, and lastly, Jason Baldwin was also sentenced to life imprisonment. It is not only utterly horrifying that three young boys were brutally murdered, but also horrifying that three young men were wrongfully incarcerated for a crime which they did not commit.

Often times there are articles in newspapers or headline segments on the news about a person who spent most of their adult life in prison, only to be freed because they were truly innocent. Thus, in the case of Joseph sledge, that was all too true. In 1976, Joseph Sledge was sentenced to prison for the double murder of Josephine Davis, 74, and her daughter Aileen, 57, at their home in the small North Carolina town of Elizabethtown (Zucchino, D., 2015 Jan., 24). It is baffling how evidence provided by officers and testimony that convicted him was the reason behind his presumed guilt and eventually the result of his freedom.

The crime that will be discussed was a rape and murder case recently happened in Waterbury, Connecticut. Chloe Ottman went out with a friend, Francisco Cruz, on a Thursday night. When she did not return home by Friday her parent’s reported to the police that she was missing. A day later her body was found. The last person to see the 16 year old girl was Francisco Cruz, who instantly became a suspect of the incident. He denied any connection to the disappearance of Chloe Ottman, but was charged with capital felony murder. It was not until a day later that he decided to tell the police the truth. Furthermore, he decided to tell the police every detail of what had happened. Cruz explained how “how he and Ottman were drinking alcohol at Holy Land USA” and went further to explain how that lead to rape and eventually murder (State's Attorney Calls Suspect's Statement 'Chilling', 2010). Police stated