How Did Lenin And Stalin Gain Power

The first reason why I think civil disobedience us ineffective is because it takes a really long time. For example, it took 27 years for Mahatma Gandhi to earn India its independence (“Gandhi Leads Civil Disobedience” 1). For most people, waiting 27 years for your country to earn

Following the death of Vladimir Lenin, Stalin utilized the political divisions within the Russian government to gain power. Firstly, Stalin was given the position of Commissar of Nationalities, which entitled the power of patronage. After Lenin died, Stalin competed with other members of the Politburo for power, however he was able to use the power of patronage to extend privileges to his supporters and isolate his competitors. This power allowed him support himself within politics and attributed to his own rise in leadership. Also, Stalin utilized the political divisions between his fellow members of the Politburo, as seen by the triumvirate that he formed. This bloc within the Politburo consisted of Stalin, Kamenev, and Zinoviev and had the

In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought

Civil disobedience is necessary if citizens see (and believe) that their leader is turning their leadership into oppression. In Gandhi’s case, he led a march to the Indian Sea in response to the British trying to take over India and dominate every aspect of these people’s lives. The point is, Gandhi’s reasons for disobedience was justifiable. He saw that Great Britain was trying to change their lifestyle, take away their wellbeing, and did something about

Civil disobedience plays an important and great role in the world. It is a major and effective part of many processes that combat injustice and immorality. In the past, it has helped countries gain independence, combatted racial segregation, affected countries’ involvement in wars and much more. People such as Parks and Gandhi have fought the immoral laws which led to thousands of millions of people having the opportunity to live a future without prejudice, discrimination and oppression because they held up their beliefs and demonstrated he importance of civil

Civil disobedience, if nothing else, forces the government to act. Whether that action is beneficial or detrimental has varied greatly throughout American history, and usually resulted in a mixed outcome. For example, after South Carolina and the other Southern states seceded, a terrible civil war broke out. In the end, slavery was abolished in all of the states, but at the cost of national unity and the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans. Similarly, the civil disobedience displayed by the American colonists in Boston during the 1770s led to an aggravated crown and a restless public, eventually giving birth to the American Revolution that would create the United States. The war cost thousands of lives, but brought freedom to the colonies, the very thing that the colonists wanted.

Upon the creation of the USSR, Lenin introduced new rule that would ensure greater totalitarian control. Only communists would be able to stand for the soviets, and so this meant that the communist party had the true control over the

The first reason on why civil disobedience is effective because it gets the point out without violence. An example of a person who got their point across without fighting was Gandhi. An example of Gandhi getting the point across without any violence was that Gandhi and his followers went on a 240 mile march to Dandi in order to get salt(Sinha 1.) This is important because the indian’s didnt fighting back as the british hit the india's as the indian’s kept on picking up the salt. The British then arrested thousands of indians but they didn’t arrest Gandhi showed many british people that indian's don't care what happens with them. After this event the British removed the heavy tax on salt which showed that india can possibly get their freedom. This shows that the indian’s believe in getting freedom

Civil disobedience has a positive impact on society. This act brings about much needed change and helps a entire class of people. When Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. were fighting for civil rights for African Americans, following the law would have never taken them anywhere. If Rosa Parks had stood up and moved for that white man, the bus boycott would not have happened and that had a huge part on changing the segregation laws. Laws wouldn't change unless people fought for the change in them. Recently, the same sex couples were granted their right to marry each other. If people just sat around and waited for the law to change, it never would have. People got out and fought for their right to be married.People would stand outside the court

One often looks to the examples of Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. when trying to explain why civil disobedience is a good or bad thing. I would like to start with a precursor to Gandhi and Dr. King. I would like to look at this example then start exploring civil disobedience and why it is or is not effective.

Civil disobedience, being that it is a peaceful resistance to unjust laws, positively impacts society. Civil disobedience has been the refugee of many minorities and victims of racism throughout the years. Without humanity having someone practice civil disobedience throughout the years, society would have an abundance of unjust laws that discriminate certain individuals. Of course, a larger amount than there is today.

Bolsheviks' Seizure of Power in 1917 There are many factors that help explain how and why the Bolsheviks managed to seize power in 1917. It was a combination of long and short term causes that together, created a revolution. The political system itself was long overdue for reform, but with a weak Tsar, the economic and social conditions became worse and worse. In 23 years, Nicholas II dropped from the glorious ‘Little Father of Russia’ to prisoners of his own country, hatred and despised by the majority, for the suffering and unhappiness he had helped create.

Civil disobedience is a way for individuals to come together in an attempt to make a change for the greater good. It’s a way for society to gradually progress peacefully. Without Martin Luther King Junior or Rosa Park’s act of civil disobedience, African Americans may still be enslaved. Without civil disobedience we would be complacent, if everyone followed along with the rules all of the time without any protest then no progress could be made. If people followed orders all of the time then we might end up in a situation like the Holocaust. The Germans obeyed Hitler’s every order which led to the wrongful death of millions of people.

When most people hear the word civil disobedience or the concept of civil disobedience, many people will think about Mohandas K. Gandhi or Martin Luther King Jr.. Mohandas J. Gandhi was someone who fought for Indians rights. Gandhi led a Satyagraha campaign for Indians. This Satyagraha campaign was the idea of nonviolence resistance. This shows that he supports the concept of civil disobedience. Gandhi was a leader who led people to, “hold to the principles of nonviolent resistance even in the face of violent tactics by those in power” (On Nonviolent Resistance speech). Here, Gandhi encouraged his followers and supporters to be nonviolent when they encounter problems. For example, when people threatens them violently, Gandhi wants them to protest quietly and not harm them. He believed that when you fight them violently, there would not be a victory because you are harming them, you are becoming like them. Gandhi says how fighting violence with violence, like a war, that there would not really be any victory. There would be no real winner because with violence, there would be

The first two leaders of the Soviet Union, Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin had very different methods in commanding their country. Differences can be seen in the way they achieved their political power and how they dealt with their political opponents. Similarities can be seen in the way that these men were unwilling to share their power. Vladimir Lenin achieved his political power by rallying fellow Bolsheviks to seize government installations and storm the capital. The plan made Lenin the visible figurehead of the Bolsheviks and the new government that was put into place.