How Did Margaret Thatcher Influence Great Britain

Former prime minister of Great Britain, Margaret Thatcher, in her eulogy, describes the strides that Ronald Reagan accomplished. Thatcher’s purpose is to honor Ronald Reagan during his time as a former United States of America President. She establishes a genuine tone in order to appeal to the grief and mournings of American citizens.

In her speech, Thatcher goes through and illustrates that even though in the end of the Cold War, Ronald Reagan won out, and America came through, not everyone was supportive of his plans. In fact, many of the American citizens had been skeptical about his plans when he chose to make an agreement with the man who had turned from ally to enemy in recent years before that. Not many people could see why Reagan would make such a bold move, but Thatcher knew that there was a reason the two conflicting countries had gotten through without firing a shot, and that reason was because Reagan knew what he was doing. In her speech, Margaret Thatcher uses the

Margaret Sanger was crucial in the fight for birth control and became a women's rights activist in order to change the ideals and values of women. Sanger influenced the American

Moreover, in February of 1993, former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was failing at doing his job. He announced his retirement and a new Prime Minister was needed to be appointed. The hopes of feminists aroused, in the Political Scene, through her speech on free trade, Kim Campbell, was the woman whom the majority of Canada hoped to change the face of Canadian Politics and rebuild the reputation of the Conservative Party alongside with the fresh scandalous act of the same party member, Brian Mulroney. She was a woman who was brave enough to handle whatever life throws at her and because of her gender, she made headlines in the political aspects. With the disregard to the Canadian Bill of rights or in other words, the Canadians were not given a referendum to choose the replacement for the retiring Prime Minister; she was elected by the Progressive Conservative Party to become the Party leader and Prime Minister of Canada, due to other candidates dropping out.

Along with their successors, the Reagan and Thatcher governments influenced American and British politics for the majority of the 1970s and 1980s. They both agreed for free-market economics and were disapproved with the ‘Great Society’. The political change created new variety of social policy commentators which included crime and justice. Individuals differed politically. Individuals who were on the right were supportive towards free-market criticisms on previous measures compared to those individuals whom were on the left who were critical of free-market economics and related political concepts. They were also critical of what they believed to be unhelpful (Newburn, 2009). In criminology, ‘realism’ is involved with the view that ‘crime’ is the outcome if known real-world causes. Realists are concerned with the forces that lead to crime perpetration instead of with how crime is defined. Right realists whom are inspired by James Q. Wilson (1985) argue that a lack of self-control is what causes crime. Individuals commit crime because they are rewarded with financial, material or emotional rewards. Left realists whom were inspired by Jock Young argue that interactions between social actors such as the police, the public, victims and offenders cause crime. In Young’s view, the effectiveness of policing is shaped by the link between the police and the public. The power of crime is formed by the link between the victim and the offender (O’Brien and Yar, 2008).

Source A could be considered to have great value to a historian studying the impact of Margaret Thatcher’s Social and Economic policies, as it comes from a speech that Margaret Thatcher made herself 5 years into her premiership. This lends the source some value, as it comes from Thatcher’s own point of view, and therefore could be considered to be very valuable to a historian studying the impact of Thatcher’s policies as no one would know more about how she arrived at her decisions and what her intentions were than Thatcher herself. It could however be argued that the fact this source comes from Thatcher herself is in fact a detriment to its value, as she will be more likely to defend herself and her actions rather than speaking honestly about

Thatcherism gained lots of opposition due to her social and economic policies. Her focus on reducing inflation and creating a self-sufficient society meant that unemployment rose. Also, those who did benefit from her policies such as privatisation encouraged the gap between the rich and poor to grow. Ultimately the growth of the get rich quick, capitalist society in the most important criticism of Thatcher as it links in with many of the other points of opposition

Oftentimes, the best leaders are those who are willing to step up and face the daunting tasks that no one else will. As Prime Minister of England during World War II, Winston Churchill’s leadership left a permanent mark upon history. Many believe that without him, the Allies would have lost the war. In the words of John C. Maxwell, “Leaders become great not because of their power, but because of their ability to empower others.” Churchill prided himself in having courage in all things and possessed the unique ability to provide others with courage also. He led the British empire through battle after battle tirelessly, saying, “Continuous effort – not strength or intelligence – is the key to unlocking our potential.” To him, there was “no use saying ‘we are doing our best.’ You have got to succeed in doing what is necessary.” Although it was almost certain that Britain would lose World War II, Churchill provided the willpower needed to stand against Germany and engendered a motivated and hardworking government, as well as an inspired nation.

Britain emerged as one of the victors of World War II and became a founding member of the United Nations with a permanent seat on the Security Council. However, it lost the title of global superpower, easily demonstrated by the Indian movement for independence, and the botched attempt to occupy the Suez Canal. Massive war debts, lack of economic productivity, and high spending, accruable to the demise of the British Empire, created problems for all new government administrations . When Margaret Thatcher took office in 1979, she became the first female prime minister and the first female head of state in the Western world. Guided by her political philosophies, she sought to fix the problems that Britain faced. In doing so, she forever changed the face of the United Kingdom.

For many, New Labour possessed an abundance of similarities to the Conservative governments previous to it, in particular the 1979-1990 party led by Margret Thatcher. These similarities are evident in their continuation of Conservative policies and their abandonment of Labour policies that were previously inherent to the party. It is important to note that I have interpreted ‘warmed-up’ as a term describing New Labour’s less confrontational style of governance in comparison to that of Thatcher. This essay will be arguing that New Labour was more than warmed-up Thatcherism, in fact, they posed as an advancer of Thatcherism through their continuation of Thatcherite policies and their decision to build upon them. To evaluate this point, it is necessary to define the origins of both New Labour and Thatcherism. The 1997

Baroness Thatcher, also know as the ‘Iron Lady’ due to her uncompromising politics and leadership, led Britain for 11 years. Margaret Thatcher’s leadership was determined, persistent, intelligent and diplomatic, showing at times such as the miner strike, the Winter of Discontent, the Falkland War and the Cold War.

She worked closely with President Ronald Reagan ad the two collaborated to deploy U.S. cruise and Pershing II missiles to show strength that the Soviet Union couldn’t surpass. Thatcher became Prime Minister before Reagan was elected President and her liberal economic example made it possible for Reagan to then become President. Thatcher was a strong leader and Reagan often looked to her for guidance. The Soviet press nicknamed her “the Iron Lady” because of how forceful she turned out to be. Thatcher played a significant role in ending the cold war. She worked closely with President Ronald Reagan ad the two collaborated to deploy U.S. cruise and Pershing II missiles to show strength that the Soviet Union couldn’t surpass. He would often ask for advise on how to deal with the cold war. Her diplomacy and friendship with Gorbachev and her influence over President Reagan that meant the end the Cold War was near. She not only did she save Britain from becoming a third-world satellite state of the Soviet Union, together with Reagan she hastened the end of the Soviet Empire without starting any actual wars and helped to promote new thinking in the Kremlin. This is by far one of her biggest legacies. She helped in defeating totalitarianism in its most vicious

“All my games were political games; I was, like Joan Of Arc, perpetually being burned at the stake.” These are meaningful words of the ever so loved, hated, and looked up to woman of India: Indira Gandhi. Indira Ghil;678andhi, as the late prime minister of India, is still is remembered to this day for the impact she had on the world. As the prime minister of India during a time of political turmoil and being a vulnerable target, it was hard for her to use her power for benefits. Although the obstacles that made her struggle, she maintained standing her ground and ended up leading India to where they are today politically.

Mrs. Thatcher has served her country for more than eleven years. Before and during her leadership of the United Kingdom

Another policy that Thatcher implemented was the use of taxation, she preferred to use indirect taxes rather than taxes on income and she also used VAT. Thatcher’s ultimate goal by doing this policy was to increase GDP, increase employment and keep inflation at bay. The use of taxation had some good effects and some bad effects. In many ways the tax policy introduced led to a use of policy mix and also promised far too much which is why it all went wrong.