How Did New York Times Promote Diversity?

The case New York Times Co. Vs United States in summary was a first amendment battle between the United States government and the prominent newspaper cooperation New York Times in 1971. The premises of this legal battle was based on the New York Times reporter Daniel Ellsberg publishing in excerpts illegally leaked, classified documents containing the United States involvement in the Vietnam War specifically on the anticipated death counts (Institution, 2015, p. n .p). However, The United States government finding out about leakage placed a prior restraint also known as “government action that prohibits speech or other expression before it can take place” on New York Times cooperation based on National Security grounds (Prior Restraint, 2015). The case, despite the over powering strength of the nation and the accusations against the New York Times Cooperation the case was ruled in favor of the New York Times by the Supreme Court (Curry, Riley, & Battistoni, 2015, p. 458).

Clay Shirky who wrote Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable (1993) argues that society doesn’t need newspapers society needs journalism to save society. Shirky supports this argument by giving a historical background to the problems newspapers face and how the problems have developed over time and the solutions society has came up with. The blogger concludes that in order for journalism to go farther new models must be created in place of past molds. Shirky directs this blog toward the current and future generations in attempt to motivate new models and methods of journalism.

The United States as a whole is seen as the land of opportunity. New York is a major central for diversity and because of that many people from different cultural atmospheres have brought their families and dreams to New York City. Although Immigration patters throughout the last 200 years have varied, New York has consistently seen people from around the world move to the city and call it home. From the earliest points in our history as a nation, New York has been a center for trade and economic growth. New York is known world wide as a cultural melting pot. While other states have had immigration surges, none have compared to the diversity and sheer number of immigrants that have made their way to the City. This paper will focus on

Competitive Strengths and Weaknesses The New York Times has a strong brand presence, name and equity in the United States. According to Michael Hirschorn, contributing editor at the Atlantic, “You really can trace almost any major story these days to something that originally appeared in The Times. The problem is that once it reaches the public, they may not even know it came from The Times.” Readers of The New York Times are extremely loyal as well. A daily issue is priced at $2.50 compared to $2.00 for the Wall Street Journal and $1.00 for USA Today. In addition, within nine months, 390,000 consumers have subscribed to www.nytimes.com for a premium price of approximately $4.00 a week [Table B] and 70% of print subscribers have taken

In the years leading up to 1971, America saw the rise of a new president, Richard Nixon elected in 1968, who would ultimately become one of the most infamous men in American history. This was coupled with the rising resistance against the Vietnam War, resistances like the Kent State shooting

The Supreme Court’s decision was supported by three main reasons. In addition to the fact that President Nixon made the restraint order without proper justification, Justices Black, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, and Marshall, the ones who concurred with the official judgement, hesitated to take action without the Congress’s tutelage. They thought that the issues were strictly legislative, so they did not refute the First Amendment (New York Times Co. v. United States; “The Espionage Statutes and Publication of Defense Information”). Also, per US Code -

In the case that was know as The Pentagon Papers Case. The plaintiff; USA argued that “prior restraint was necessary to protect national security.” The defendant; NYT said that it wouldn’t hurt the people to know what was going on in a war that their own country was fighting in. The Pentagon Papers was a secret Department of Defense study of U.S. political and military involvement in Vietnam from 1945-1967. On June 30, 1971 the supreme court came to their decision. They voted 6 to 3 in favor of the New York Times. In writing for the

Daniel Ellsberg Daniel Ellsberg took a stand against the government by releasing a copy of the Pentagon Papers to press in an effort to inform the public about the Pentagon Papers and their contents about U.S. policy in Vietnam (Indochina). (Reason.com) His friend and former colleague at RAND Corporation, Anthony Russo

Yes. By a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled in favor of the New York Times; the “classified information” violated the First Amendment right. In its per curiam opinion the Court held that the government did not overcome the "heavy presumption against" prior restraint of the press in this

The release of the Pentagon Papers in 1971 proved the covert actions of past presidents dating back to all the way to Truman, including other presidents such as Johnson and current President Nixon. The government had not only been going behind the back of the people, but of the backs

The New York TImes Company Vs. The United States All through American history there have been many debates on whether during war times rights can be suspended or not. On April 27th 1861 Abraham Lincoln suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus, he did this under the justification of the start of

Albo 1 Harrison Albo Mrs. Knotts 3 English H February 27, 2012 The Pentagon Papers Case In the past, there has always been conflict between the free press and the government. This conflict was very evident in the Pentagon Papers case, also known as New York Times Co. v. United States. Historically, the Supreme Court has

The concept that marriage can occur, endure, and succeed without the factor of love seems to be common in many other places in the world. “Who Needs Love! In Japan, Many Couples Don’t,” by Nicholas D. Kristof published in the New York Times in 1996 explores the aspects and success of loveless marriage in Japan beginning with Yuri Uemura of Omiya, Japan.

This paragraph will criticize my thesis statement by presenting analysis and cases in which New Urbanism has achieved diversity physically and socially.

percent of newspapers nationwide have a declining percentage of diverse reporters. The statistics regarding newsroom diversity for the top six corporate-owned newspapers (USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the