How Did Paul IV Replace The Tridentine Mass?

Due to the letter and Luther’s 95 Theses, Martin Luther was excommunicated. Consequently, Luther and his supporters reformed the church. This reformation caused many people to lessen their support on the

3 years later in 1525 he brought in a new ‘Holy Communion’ in replacement for the ‘Mass’.

     Changes occurred in various categories throughout the whole council. One of the more dramatic changes that occurred in the church, is the vernacular used during mass. Until Vatican II, the mass had been traditionally spoken in Latin, but afterwards was allowed to be spoken in the

481 years ago change was stirring in the court of King Henry the Eighth and The Roman Catholic Church, this was no ordinary change though this kind of change is the kind that changed religious history.

As long as Paul could remember he had his giant glasses on and was told he couldn’t see without them. But even though Paul can see fine without them. Paul, unfortunately, deals with this on a day to day basis. We discover who Paul is and how significant events changed him. Paul also experiences switching schools. We see how Paul sees the world and his perspective on certain events.

Pope Paul VI pushed to bring back together the cardinals and reconvene Vatican II. By doing this, he changed our church. Our liturgy would be different if he hadn’t reconvened Vatican II. By understanding his history, maybe we can come to understand his motives to Change the Church. Our future pope was born in Brescia, Lombardy on September 27, 1897 under the name Giovanni Battista Montini. He was born to a prominent newspaper editor. He had very bad health as a child, so the priests allowed him to attend the seminary as a day student. He was ordained into the priesthood on May 29, 1920. He was then transferred to a catholic university in rome, springboarding his rise through the church.

During the time from 100 CE-600 CE Rome experienced changes in religion, converting from the belief in a system of gods to Christianity and also, in the fall of their empire, resulting from internal and external forces, but continuities also existed, including the use of the common languages, Latin and Greek.

1530 Catholic Church launched "the council of Trent" to reform the church. Pope Paul III

The Acts of Paul and Thecla follow the story of a young girl, Thecla, who at first is the embodiment of the perfect, chaste daughter who later decides to run off and defy social norms. Dating to the second century, this text is thought to have been written down by a presbyter however was performed orally before that. Those that passed down this tale of Thecla are thought to be mainly women, as the subject is women-centered and would have been relatable. Although this text got its beginnings as an oral tale, there would have been historical information contained inside. Thecla is a figure that courageously defies the social order and opts out of the ascetic Christian community which were common themes in the Apocryphal Acts of the second and

It seems strange that so little is known biographically about one of the most important figures in Christian history, but this only serves to add to the mystery and grandeur surrounding the Apostle Paul of Tarsus. Much, however, is known of the time after his conversion to Christ and what he did to contribute to Christianity in this period, and it is this that leaves a greater legacy than the simple facts of his life. The contributions that he made towards the cause of Christ and the spreading and formation of Christianity are what he is perennially remembered for.

A broken Latin Christendom occurred with the rejection of all papal authority by many kingdoms and this took place all because protestants rejected the special, sacerdotal, or supernatural character of the priesthood (Norton, p. 91). What began with the emergence of much unhappiness with the clergy, by all classes of society, turned into a full scaled revolt triggering countries to pick sides in this religious revolution. With individuals, such as Lutheran, Calvin, and Leyden calling for a complete overhaul of the Roman church and the clergy refusing to change, a religious ticking time bomb was waiting to explode, which it did. Once exploded the Protestants made new rules, rules that would fix the major issues that protestants had and that

It changed primarily for three reasons: (a) the Church as it is today confronts, and, as a result of progressions in communication, knows itself to be confronting, not a single culture (Western, say), but very different cultures across the globe; (b) our contemporary, heightened

I believe that it was good for the religion to change because that way people don't rely wholly upon religion for everything and tend to think more for themselves. Not only that there were more choices of religion, which may have been a bad thing

If you just told someone something very important you would expect them to to remember it if just for a very brief time. It is this very thought that concerns many scholars with the authenticity of II Thessalonians as a true Pauline work (Harris, 2014). It is argued that if Paul truly wrote the second work why would he repeat so much of what he just said. More specifically why would he change so drastically his stance concerning the return of Christ. In his earlier work he specifically tells the believers that the Parousia is very near. In II Thessalonians he all of a sudden tells the same audience that certain things have to transpire before the return.