How Did President Truman Describe Nato's Creation?

In 1949, the United States signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) with the United Kingdom, France, Canada, and other capitalist states . Through this treaty, the countries agreed to defend each

NATO- NATO, also known as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, was a military alliance created by 12 countries across North America and Western Europe. NATO was formed in Washington D.C. on April 4, 1949. This organization was formed to supply protection against the Soviet Union. NATO was significant because it gave freedom to develop unrestricted military growth. NATO was also important because it provided protection against the Soviet Union.

While this conflict ended in defeat for America, it was only one of their attempts at stopping the spread of communism. Another way they opposed communism was by creating a treaty with several European countries. This Treaty was named Nato, and they promised that they would aid each other in the event of an armed attack (Document 4). This was the US’s way of securing itself against any hypothetical future attacks launched by the Soviet Union. This treaty could draw some similarities to the entangled alliances of WW1.

Yet, this hope was met with failure. In response to NATO, the Soviets created their own alliance called the Warsaw Pact which unified the Soviets and their satellite states. Overall, because of legislatures like Truman’s policy of containment, NATO, and The Marshall Plan, the United States funded billions to limit the Soviet’s from expansion as well as protect their own interests both domestically and

What purpose does NATO serve to Canada? The basic argument of this paper is that Canada should remain in NATO. Canada as a ‘middle power’ needs to continue perceiving NATO as a strategic tool to restrain and link all powerful states together and counterbalance U.S dominance. More importantly, if Trudeau’s government really wants to go back to its internationalism approach and demonstrate how different they are from Harper’s administration, Canada needs to remain in NATO in order to reassure its commitment to multilateralism and collective security. Canada’s interest of always having a seat at the table among powerful states and therefore the chance to be

1). On the other side was the United States who lived through Capitalism and believed in democracy in which everyone has a say in government. The United States gave everyone power and they were scared of the whole world turning to Communism. The Soviet Union and United States were two very strong countries that would start a huge nuclear war if they fought directly against each other. They used Proxy Wars to keep a nuclear war from happening. The United States was involved in NATO. “The parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or in North America shall be considered as an attack against them all” (Doc. 4). NATO was a way to have the backs of the North Atlantic area. If one place was attacked they would consider it as an attack on all of them and than they would all do whatever was

However, the tension kept building between the United States and Soviet Union. Soon after the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan was created to aid England in rebuilding their war damages. In addition to this, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, was conceived. This organization consisted of twelve countries that allied together to vow that an attack on one of them would be an attack on all of them. In response to this, Russia developed their own organization under the Warsaw Pact. In 1949, the Cold War was in full swing when Russia exploded their own atomic bomb, no longer giving the US the upper

Poll of Public Opinion, Random H) Although there were many economic problems in the 1960s four additional member joined NATO around that time. There were 12 founding members of NATO. Truman proposed four things for foreign aid: the United Nations would be supported, U.S. programs would help countries economic recovery, countries that were pro freedom and anti “aggression” would be supported, and a new program was available for improvement and growth of undeveloped areas. (Document I) Additional members and current members of NATO would help the U.S. economy grow because we would be able to trade with each member.

In 1949 the US formed a mutual defense alliance with Western Europe called the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Truman had a hard time convincing Congress that this organization was necessary on account of American sentiment previously being avoidant of entangling alliances. The NATO charter pledged that an attack on one of the member nations constituted an attack on all of the members. Stalin’s aggressive actions at Berlin accelerated the American effort to use military means to contain communism. So the implementation of this alliance represented Truman’s willingness to disregard the tradition of neutrality. The Soviets also create an alliance called the Warsaw Pact countries that had the equivalent ambitions as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

Once the U.S. brought a close to the war NATO was formed with the help of the United States and many other

The Truman Doctrine was a major cause for NATO because of its financial support to different countries. It was established on March 12, 1947, after president Truman told Congress “It must be the policy of the United States of America to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities, or by outside pressure” (NATO Information Service, 1976, p.17). After Truman said that, the Congress of the United States gave $400 million to help Greece and Turkey after the Soviet Union had got to them (NATO Information Service, 1976, p.17). The Truman Doctrine was specifically made to help Greece and Turkey but Western Europe needed just as much help. Western Europe still had shortages from the war and the economy was not good at all. Once General George C. Marshall saw this on June 5, 1927, he decided the United States should make a program to help Europeans recover. Marshall thought all the European countries should have to agree on the program. He wanted the program to be efficient in helping all the European countries and not just some of them. When Marshall talks about the program he states “directed not against any country or doctrine but against, hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos” (NATO Information Service, 1976, p.17). Marshall is implying that the bigger picture is not about the different countries, but that none of them should have to deal with hunger, poverty, desperation and chaos. The Truman Doctrine was not made to help just one person or

NATO Secretary General Lord Ismay recognized this issue, which coupled with an increasing difficulty “to sustain popular support for defense expenditures” and the foresight of a “considerable expenditure (…) to achieve the basic objectives” of NATO strategy caused him to request a detailed reevaluation of the potential implications put forth by the “New Approach”. Following this line of thought, the United Kingdom was by far the biggest upholder of cuts in defense expenditures, as it began pressuring the rest of the Alliance to issue political guidance that would enable a reduction of conventional forces necessary using the guise of nuclear armament as more than sufficient to defend European territory.

NATO starts the year 2000 with the issue of concern. The European Allies' defense capability, stabilization efforts in the Balkans, and relations with Russia are at the top of a highly charged agenda.

Roberts (2007) stresses on the defensive purpose of this establishment in that they were not meant to challenge the Western superpowers, but to protect the state against probable future attacks from the West as similar to Germany’s invasion in 1941. This motive was justified when the US, UK, and France decided to unite their portion of German territories for economic purposes, particularly to centralise efforts for European rebuilding (Gransow and Jarausch,1994). It can be said that the Western Alliance now possessed more geographical advantage in Europe than the USSR as they have successfully enlarged their areas of occupancy three territories into West Germany while the Soviet Union was left with only East Germany. In addition, Gaddis (1997) points out that the Western powers were further bound together through a security alliance called NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) which was formed as a military antipodal to the Soviet’s power in Eastern Europe. As the USSR oversaw that a cadre of American allies was threatening its territorial security in Europe by trying to amass Germany and form a Western-based military organisation, the hostility between the Soviet Union and the US

UN and NATO were both formed after major crises in the world. UN was being formed during and after WWII. In