How Did Robin And The People Use Democracy To Rule Themselves

George III, their former leader, was a tyrant. Moreover, the king set taxes and laws on the colonists, but they did not have a vote or say in the government. The Constitution guarded against tyranny as power was divided. The founding fathers created several ways to prevent absolute rule - federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the Great Compromise.

The American Revolution was an unequivocal example of the ability of a nation’s people to rise and defeat an inadequate government. When a government fails to protect its inhabitants, citizens will grow uneasy and fight for their rightful cause. The British government’s rule over its colonies was erroneous and harmful to the colonists’ best interests. Best described by John Hancock, the British government’s rule caused many colonists to become despondent with their ruler. “As though they thought it not enough to violate our civil rights, they endeavored to deprive us of the enjoyment of our religious privileges; to vitiate our morals, and thereby render us deserving of destruction.” Evidently, the American Revolution was sparked by a

DBQ- Democracy in Colonial America The democracy in colonial America which, was a work in progress, had both democratic and undemocratic features. A Democratic Feature of colonial America was the Control of Abusive Power. Document 1: The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut are an example of the Control of Abusive power in colonial times. The order talks about the forms of check and balance used.

No matter where one goes there will always be a set of rules that govern what behaviors are acceptable, and therefore create a certain society around that. Robert Dahl wrote the essay entitled “Why Democracy?” to explain the effects of government own its citizens. The Midshipman Regulations are no exception to influencing the society of the regiment. They create a society that closely mirrors the society Dahl envisions in his essay. The Midshipman Regulations intentionally create a certain kind of atmosphere that provides an outlet for moral responsibility, to develop as a person, but at the same time restricts numerous freedoms. Dahl’s idea of a democratic society closely follows what the Midshipmen Regulations are trying to create, but would

James Madison once said that, “The accumulation of all powers… in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (Introduction Document) However, in more modern words tyranny can be described as “harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual- like a king or dictator.” (Introduction Document) The American colonies had just freed themselves from the tyranny of King George III, and were in search of a frame of government to rule by.

Language, like all else, changes over time. “Nice” used to mean foolish, and “awful” used to mean full of awe. This too gives context to why when democracy, or “rule by the people,” is mentioned today, the word does not have the same connotation as it did to the inhabitants of colonial North America. Similarly, the democracy of the 1800s, colloquially known as the early republic period, was different from democracy during the time of the revolution. The tradition in colonial Virginia, for instance, was that democratic voting power only applied to the aristocratic members of the clergy. In New England, only the property-holding “elect” had a say in town decisions. This tradition of not-quite equality in democracy held through to revolutionary times. As Stanley N. Katz puts it, “Indeed, during most of American history, framers of constitutions, lawmakers, and judges avoided committing the nation to the protection of individual equality.” Because of the strength of majorities, laissez-faire economic policy, and an increase in opportunity, democracy replaced tradition as the provider of political power during the early republic in the northern United States.

The type of government that colonial America had was a democracy. Democracy in colonial America was a work in progress full of democratic and undemocratic features. Democracy is full of key features, some democratic and undemocratic. Also, some of the features can be a work in progress.

President Jefferson and President Jackson were two complete different people. Though each one had their flaws, they also had some good intentions throughout their presidency. The government was different under each president because each one had their own ideas for America. There is a chain of causes that made America the way it was under each president. Jefferson was a good person but was not the best president because he always thought about himself and never what everyone else wanted. Jackson was not a good person but he was a good president because he got things done as a president. He did thing that were good not only for him but for America 's future.

The Colonists were practicing self government in the colonies because England their, mother country was 3,000 miles across the ocean and trying to control them. They were creating early democratic features, but many factors of colonial life were that they were still practicing undemocratic features of government. Individual or human rights, Equality, and free and fair regular elections were properties that colonist found looking for self government. During colonial America, democracy was a work in progress with democratic and undemocratic features.

The United States of America has stayed united and fought through many hardships, including the American Revolution, The War of 1812, The World Wars, and many other conflicts. However, back in the middle of the 19th century, there was an issue that literally divided our nation: slavery. Slavery had been a big part of our economy, especially in the South, where their main source of income was from agriculture. However, the founding fathers found this issue morally wrong, but, in order to prevent a divided nation, they left it for later. Well as always later came, and with it, debate over how to solve the issue of slavery. Many in the North felt it was wrong and should not be allowed in the new territories, while Southerners believed that popular

Colonial America was a very important time because of the events that occurred and because of everything that happened, including the use of elected representatives in the House of Burgesses, and freedom of choice for the citizens, which has an affect on the world today .These events that happened during Colonial America were both good and bad, and a lot of these events had to deal with democracy, which means that the supreme power in a government is conferred on the people and used by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually including held free elections from time to time. This leads to the idea about how Colonial America is seen as democratic because of certain elements that include how people could elect representatives

In the second year of the insurrection against the Sheriff of Nottingham, the tide of events is turning against Robin Hood and his men. The revolt, which began as a personal crusade inspired by anger, is feeling the consequences of not having a long term strategy or plan. In order to be successful, key changes are necessary for Robin Hood and the Merrymen.

The thirteen colonies began to develop democratic features. Democracy in colonial America was a work in progress, and had both democratic and undemocratic features. The way people were living, there were many aspects of undemocratic features. These laws were made to help create a peaceful country.

Since the leaders of the government were corrupt, the people from whom Robin Hood stole were evil and villainous. When people today claim to be a modern day Robin Hood by stealing from the rich and giving to the poor, it is an evil person stealing from the innocent. Robin Hood was a good person stealing from the evil people. That’s the difference. Robin Hood did the right thing by betraying his country. The things his country was doing were evil and corrupt. (Lindahl 1). When your country is doing terrible things, like persecuting the innocent, poor people of the country, (Lindahl 1), it would be wrong not to betray the country. They were also involved in charging ridiculous taxes and oppressing the common people of the land. (“Robin Hood: The Folk Hero” 2). This is yet another reason that Robin Hood had to betray his country. Fighting against the evil is always the right thing to do whether you have pledged allegiance to them or not.

Cromwell had declared himself as the lord protector of England, and was to run the state with the people as the supreme power. This was not the case though, as he became more of a dictator in which the people’s opinions didn’t matter. Cromwell is not a protector but a dictator and it is shown in his abuse of the people, his absolute power and intolerance for other religions.