How Did Rosa Parks Use Peaceful Resistance

Each act of disobedience directs attention towards a specific idea, and prompts the society to talk about it. It also gives licesnse for the liberated members of that society to form their own opinions about the idea. Since the protest harms no one, save the individual who is willing to face the consequences of breaking the law in question. It does not infringe on any other individual's rights. Peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact on a free society since it educates that society's members and may lead to more liberty for them, which would create a freer

Surely it does not mean pleasing every person, every group, or every organization. For a peaceful resistance to positively impact a society, the oppression has to be cut at the roots. The end result of a peaceful resistance should always be justice, and should always end in an oppressed group no longer being oppressed. Which might be why there is still a peaceful, and sometimes not so peaceful, resistance to racism. What the peaceful resistance of people like Martin Luther King Jr., James Forman, and Elie Wiesel resulted in was a new knowledge to the people. The long and laborious tasks they and others fighting for equality performed led to a world where people of color could attend college, and could experience the freedom of equal opportunity. These people, these people advocating for peaceful resistance, changed the world for minority groups. As we know, minority groups make up a large part of many free societies, but have historically had very little opportunity compared to that of their oppressors. Any peaceful resistance that results in the end of oppression and the start of equal opportunity is making a positive impact that will continue to inspire change and growth within a

Peaceful resistance proved that Black Americans could rebel against the government without using violence.Though not everyone agreed with these principles, it helped kick start the civil rights movement showing that African Americans were not going to let racist remarks tear them down. Our national government needs to focus on peaceful protest, instead of using media to only focus on violence. There is continuing problems with racism in the United States, and a peaceful resistance benefits the cause to rebel. Using voices instead of fits to resist the flaws in the government is the basis of

Peaceful resistance in the United States of America, done with the right intentions, has a positive impact of a free society. I hold this belief because as humans we can be flawed in our ways of thinking and require something to draw our attention for us to realize our flawed views. Peaceful resistance is positive because it draws attention to an issue in society, it communicates a level of civility, and it attempts to initiate a positive way of addressing issues in society.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts our free society. It allows us to make our voices heard and spread a message if there is a law that we find is either unfair or goes against our protected freedoms. Peaceful resistance has helped our country grow on multiple occasions. It has always been a part of our countries history and is well protected by our First Amendment rights. Due to this, There is little to know doubt that peaceful resistance has positively effected the lives of many Americans.

Whether peaceful or negative resistance everyone gets fed up at a point of time, no matter the justifications or the reason. Ms. Rosa Parks as well as many others did what they believed to be right. In this case I believe Parks held a positive influence on the society. She was simply sitting down coming from work tired. Like every other human being who possibly could've been tired, just got kicked out there home or any situation of that sort all possible situations. Except this one was a problem just because a white gentlemen decided to be childish and chose to make the young lady to get up as if his situation was worse than hers could be. We may never know truly the reason why this man decided to chose Rosa Parks seat however I can say she was tired. People fail to

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it arouses concern and opens the eyes of law makers and others who are obliged to follow them.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society, because all committed acts of civil disobedience, all but in very different cases. Have shown a positive impact amongst the people by proving to everyone and the government that every U.S citizen has the freedom to fight for their rights and freedom and not let anyone disrespect their human morals.

Peaceful resistents to laws either positively or negatively impacts a free society. I believe that peaceful resistant to laws does positively impact a free society just look at Rosa Parks, Thomas Jefferson and also Daniel Ellsberg they all helped in some type of way by using peaceful resistance to the laws. In some ways civil disobedience does help the government get better and also some says that it destroys the civil society. From the article ,"Is it right to break the law" by Charles Frankel it discuss is it ever right to break the law and in some situations it is but it also depends on how you handle the situation and what your motives are. It depends on if you are harmimg someone and if your taking a stand and wanting to change something for the better. I do not believe that is showing negatively on society

Actions speak louder than words. Rosa Parks could have said that she was tired of getting mistreated by the whites, but she took matters in to her own hands. Civil disobedience is a type of protest in which protesters deliberately violate a law. Civilians basically disobey law’s. They want the society to see the dissenting view that they see. Rosa Parks was a independent black woman, standing up for what she believed in. Rosa Parks involvement in civil disobedience was due to personal influences, refusing to give her seat to a white, and she did achieve success unsung this controversial method of standing up for what she strongly believes to be right. She was a very brave but also stubborn woman.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. As a society there is nothing stronger than "We the people". Our silence and words speak louder than any actions of ours ever could. Rosa Parks did not scream or fight back against the policemen or the people who tried to make her go sit in the back of the bus. She just sat there quietly which scared people.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society as long as the person is willing to take on the punishment. If you are resisting an unjust law, then in order for it to be effective no one must be harmed and the resistance must be organized and controlled. Peaceful resistance to laws has been more efficient in general in the history of the United States. If you look at the examples of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X when they were struggling for equal rights, Dr. King was much more successful in his movement because his movement was peaceful while Malcom X’s movement was violent. The United States government tends to make change a little easier when dealt with in a more peaceful and diplomatic matter.

The positive effects that peaceful resistance or civil disobedience, the non-violent act of opposing a law one considers unjust and accepting the consequences, far outweigh the negative impacts to a free

Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? I think that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Many people used civil disobedience to prove a point in a situation that they believe needs to be changed. There are people such as Henry Throeau, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks. Many people say that Henry Thoreau is the backbone to civil disobedience. Thoreau was arrested in 1846 for refusing to pay six years of poll taxes in protest of slavery and the Mexican American War. Thoreau believed that individuals could be free only if their actions were true to their own beliefs, with or without the support or approval of the community. Thoreau inspired Gandhi first and then MLK to follow, but these two leaders are responding to more pressing circumstances and responding as members of subjugated classes of people sharply defined by the social markers of race and ethnicity. Another important person who used civil disobedience is the same person who said "You must be the change you wish to see in this world" -Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi used nonviolent civil disobedience to protest racial pass laws in South Africa and in India's Independence struggle, including the famous Salt

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence