How Did Rousseau Influence The French Revolution

802 Words4 Pages
Rousseau was a man of great things, that led to a point in history which would change the way society worked forever. He was one of the most influential thinkers during the Enlightenment, which helped the people gain more independence and knowledge. Through his works he was able to influence other greats of their time like, Immanueal Kant which helped branch his ideas into the French Revolution. His main standpoint, was that government should be ruled based on the people. He was a strong believer that the people had all the power, if they knew how to gain it. His overall arching goals were, modern political, educational, and sociological thought. His ideas helped unlock the way the people did things, and how government was run. In return,…show more content…
It is a major turning point in European history and modern politics. His goal was to make a better political system. He believed that the Social Contract would make men equal and free; and protected their liberty. It can also be assumed, that his work greatly influenced Napoleon. Napoleon’s impact was focused on equality, liberty, and fraternity which all three greatly evolved from Rousseau’s work. Napoleon receiving and furthering Rousseau’s work, helped support the evidence that he in fact did change the way history will forever be. Both men being of the utter most importance that they are, it is apparent that the social contract indeed did help evolve political and sociological beliefs. Rousseau believed that the most troubling problem, was he didn’t believe there was one person who could fulfill the role of leading their country, with these goals in mind. His ideas had a less developed socialism impact. He stated, “In order to become free, every individual must give up all his rights to the entire community, creating the same conditions for all and thus equality.” However, Rousseau was a paradox. He contradicted himself, and may have confused his audience on what he was trying to persuade. He stated, “Finally, each man, in giving himself to all, gives himself to nobody.”; which completely went against everything else he stated in his Social
Get Access