How Did Socrates Changed My Mind

Most of the information that we learn about Socrates comes from the work and writings of one of his students, Plato. It has been alleged that the great Philosopher wrote nothing down for others to read, and as such, the knowledge and the teachings from Socrates that is relied upon to convey his philosophy and the epic story of his life comes not from himself, but his students who attempt to provide and accurate picture of the methods and philosophical beliefs held by their mentor and teacher.

Socrates was a Greek philosopher, who is one of the founders of western philosophy. Socrates never wrote down his ideas or thoughts; his student, Plato, wrote down his ideas and thoughts. Socrates was accused of expressing there were different Gods and he was brought to trial in 399.B.C.E. Socrates character, in the different passages I read, Euthyphro, Apology and Citro are a little contradictory. Also if the act of persuading the state is the only alternative to blind obedience, why did Socrates' in both of specifically in his defense and generally in his career make so little effort to persuade the people when they were acting unjustly? In this essay I hope to demonstrate how Socrates character contradicts in these different passages and

In Plato’s Apology of Socrates, Socrates defies the legislative authority of Athens by refusing to stop philosophizing, which he justifies in the name of reason. Socrates’s argument in favor of philosophizing is based on what he believes is human nature or the gods’ will, which is demonstrated when he states, “I will obey the gods rather than you; and as long as I breathe and am able to, I will certainly not stop philosophizing…” (Plato’s Apology of Socrates, 81). Socrates goes on to claim that his actions are just because he is seeking virtue and ultimately, happiness, and “how [the] soul will be the best possible” (Plato’s Apology of Socrates, 81). He argues that it is human nature to philosophize and this is how humans reach their ultimate fulfillment and happiness, and anything that interferes with that pursuit of happiness is by definition unjust. When Athens orders Socrates to stop philosophizing, they are interfering with his pursuit of happiness and thus, the law is unjust and can be disobeyed.

Socrates has a unique position in the history of philosophy. On one hand he is the most influential on another he is the least known. In his later life he is seen to stalk the streets barefoot, to spite shoemakers. He went about arguing and questioning people and revealing inconsistencies in their beliefs. He began teaching students but never accepted payments for doing so. This was possible because of the inheritance left by his father. Socrates wrote nothing of himself so we are dependent upon the works of both his students and associates who present a view as close to

Socrates was a Greek philosopher, who is one of the founders of western philosophy. Socrates never wrote down his ideas or thoughts, his students or compressors, Plato, wrote down his ideas and thoughts. Socrates was accused of expressing there were different Gods and he was brought to trial in 399.B.C.E. Socrates character, in the different passages I read, Euthyphro, Apology and Citro are a little contradictory. And if the act of persuading the state is the only alternative to blind obedience, why did Socrates' in both of specifically in his defense and generally in his career make so little effort to persuade the people when they were acting unjustly? In this essay I hope to demonstrate how Socrates character contradicts in these different passages and why didn't he persuade the people when the people were acting so unjustly.

A philosophical attitude toward life should play a major part in our lives. It is crucial for us as humans to learn and accept lessons learned through the experience of life. If you do not “examine your life” then what do you learn and what do you gain? Socrates’ in “The Trial and Death of Socrates” he details this in many ways. We can pull all the evidence and ideas we need from this text written by Plato. In the 3 parts Euthyphro, Apology and Crito many conclusions are made and there is much to learn from this text. Some of the most important parts allude to this idea of living life with a philosophical attitude. The book begins with the search for the definition of piety. In the apology Socrates’ details his side of the argument showing everyone the power of his own ideas and that is proved by his execution and finally in the Crito his commitment to his way of life is the last point that Socrates’ made. This text is chalked full of life lessons but the most important is the one that urges people to live their lives while never stopping to learn and think.

Socrates expressed many beliefs that opposed the commonly held beliefs of many of the elite members of Athenian society. For instance, he believed in divine power—that gods could use their powers to affect life on Earth—but he did not believe in many of the gods that most Greeks believed in. For Socrates, focusing on what is moral, or right, and on how people should best lead their lives was more important than focusing on what the gods wanted. In addition, he emphasized the search for knowledge related to important moral issues, such as justice. Because of this, he often questioned people about their beliefs and criticized the democratic system of Athens

Glaucon had challenged Socrates with the question of what reason do we have to perform just actions. Socrates was able to successfully convince Glaucon that it is better to be a just person rather than an unjust one. In book IV in the Republic, Socrates believes that to be a just individual with a harmonious and well-ordered soul, there are three important parts of the soul that must do its own work well. The three parts of the soul are desire, reason, and spirit; they must maintain in their appropriate boundaries in order to work well together. Reason thinks about the good of everything, spirit follows what reason thinks is right, and together they govern and maintain desire to stay within its limits.

Philosophy can be defined as the pursuit of wisdom or the love of knowledge. Socrates, as one of the most well-known of the early philosophers, epitomizes the idea of a pursuer of wisdom as he travels about Athens searching for the true meaning of the word. Throughout Plato’s early writings, he and Socrates search for meanings of previously undefined concepts, such as truth, wisdom, and beauty. As Socrates is often used as a mouthpiece for Plato’s ideas about the world, one cannot be sure that they had the same agenda, but it seems as though they would both agree that dialogue was the best way to go about obtaining the definitions they sought. If two people begin on common ground in a conversation, as Socrates often tries to do, they are

Socrates is known for his ability to ask questions of people and cause them to think critically about the topic to formulate ideas. It’s a method that causes the person defending a point of view to question and possibly contradict themselves to strengthen the others point. Socrates ability to use analogies and ignorance of his accuser, Meletus, was a valid way of defending the charges set against him. Socrates is accused of corrupting the youth of Athens by Meletus. However, Socrates argues that it was unintentional.

Socrates spent his time questioning people about things like virtue, justice, piety and truth. The people Socrates questioned are the people that condemned him to death. Socrates was sentenced to death because people did not like him and they wanted to shut him up for good. There was not any real evidence against Socrates to prove the accusations against him. Socrates was condemned for three major reasons: he told important people exactly what he thought of them, he questioned ideas that had long been the norm, the youth copied his style of questioning for fun, making Athenians think Socrates was teaching the youth to be rebellious. But these reasons were not the charges against him, he was charged with being an atheist and

Without the research and curiosity of our forefathers, we would not know nor would we have what we have today.

What worries many great intellectuals is the thought of being represented. The scholar Socrates was know as a calculated man who tried to delve into and honestly answer all of his quagmires about life and the universe. While this may be true, when comparing many of the contemporary Athenians who quote him there are countless inconsistencies. Not only do these irregularities intrigue present day students of classical works, they raise questions about the veracity of his quoted works. There are some works which shed a positive light on the scholar while others convey the contrary. One such comparison is that of Plato’s book, Apology and Aristophanes’ play The Clouds. Throughout both masterpieces there are connotations that they both disagreed and presumably misrepresented Socrates’ methods, beliefs and overall views. Misrepresenting Socrates has inevitably created an only partial representation of the real, truth seeking man that he was and has forced the present day scholar to accept the inconsistencies as part of the mysteries of Ancient Greece.

Plato, a famous philosopher, tried to define justice through his writing on the Republic. In books one through four Plato writes about Socrates and Thrasymachus’ discussion on justice. Thrasymachus thinks that injustice is preferable to justice, but Socrates tries to argue the opposite with five examples and facts. The argument is a tough one, but Socrates is right in the

members of the city and children of the land over their status as individual people, socrates is the best oh my god I have so much Frekaing homework. The only other conceivable way to change the society so drastically would involve the “sustained effort of every individual by himself”—it would necessitate that “all men . . . become philosophers” and the total transformation of human nature