preview

How Did The Japanese Foreign Crisis In The 17th Century

Better Essays

HH1002 Essay Outline
CHIN LI-CHENG U1630612C HISTORY T3
Topic
The role of Japanese foreign policy in relation to the 17th Century crisis
Research Question
Did the foreign policy adopted by the Tokugawa Bakufu help Japan to cope with the challenges of the ‘general crisis’ during the 17th Century, or did it worsen the problems faced by Japan?
Hypothesis
Hypothesis: The foreign policy adopted by the Tokugawa Bakufu served to help Japan to cope with the challenges of the ‘general crisis’ during the 17th Century.
Null Hypothesis: The foreign policy adopted by the Tokugawa Bakufu did not help Japan to cope with challenges of the ‘general crisis’ during the 17th Century, and instead served to worsen the situation.
Assumptions
In this essay, I will agree with certain scholars that there was indeed a ‘general crisis’ during the 17th Century, where many countries in the world suffered from decline in several aspects such as economy and politics. This ‘general crisis’ affected Japan as well, although Japan generally fared better than other countries in East Asia during the 17th Century. …show more content…

This foreign policy, commonly known as sakoku or “closed country”, is often seen as a period of isolation for Japan that resulted in a reduction of foreign trade and diplomatic relations. However, even beyond the Dutch at Nagasaki, Japan actually sought to establish trade and diplomatic relations with its East Asian neighbours such as Korea and Ryukyu. Therefore, in this essay, I will take the foreign policy of Japan during the 17th Century as being a period of controlled contact rather than isolation. I will also avoid using the term sakoku as it implies isolationism, and use the general term foreign policy

Get Access