Wilson’s relationship with the peace movement was varied through his entire presidency, and especially so through the wavering beginning of World War I. The extent to which he allowed the peace movement to shape his stance on World War I can be further analyzed by investigating the context surrounding his constantly shifting views on the coming war and his relationship with the effort.
In the very beginning, Wilson and the aggregating peace movement were in a symbiotic relationship, as Wilson had been the initial figure head for the peace movement (Brewer, 50-53). However, Wilson saw Germany’s violence increasing greatly and becoming a threat to the safety of the United States, and that his responses were greatly limited to ensure citizen
…show more content…
The Zimmerman telegram was the clear sign to Wilson that his neutrality was not working, and he had to take action to suppress dissent in light of the changes in his stance that were about to develop (Span, 41). Although there are various reasons as to why Wilson made such decisions, I will be examining his choices in reference to his previous loyalty to the peace movement. So, all things considered, Wilson’s choice to limit public involvement in the press in regards to the war was a means to squander those involved in the peace movement who would undoubtedly oppose the American entrance into the war. Once America entered World War I, it only took about three months for the Espionage Act to become law – showing that Wilson’s intentions for the law, possibly, were to limit opposition to the wartime involvement (Span, 41). It can be argued that the peace movement did in fact change Wilson’s stance on World War I in that he now sought to actively limit its influence instead of propagate it. Furthermore, since Wilson took action to enter the war less than a year after his presidency was secured, thus negating his previous promises of neutrality, it is evident that the peace movement had now little effect on his stance on entry into the
After winning the election of 1916 barring the slogan, “We kept us out of war!” Wilson began his “peace without victory” crusade. (Zieger, 44) He failed to identify the secret treaties that were entered between the Allies during the war and Germany’s unwillingness to concede anything from a war they did not lose. When it was apparent that a “peace without victory” would be unattainable all that was left was a catalyst and the United States
The end of World War I left much of America confused on the country’s role in world affairs. Many people believed that the United States should primarily worry about its own issues and problems, and let the world handle their own problems. But President Woodrow Wilson was not one of those people. He believed that the United States should be directly involved in the issues affecting all of the countries of the world. He also wanted the United States to be the country to make a push for a League of Nations. “The people of the United States could act upon no other principle; and to the vindication of this principle they are ready to devote their lives, their honor, and everything that they possess. The normal climax of this the culminating and final war for human liberty has come, and they are ready to put their own strength, their own highest purpose, their own integrity and devotion to the test.” Wilson believed that if the United States needed to be a part of a League of Nations in charge of keeping peace around the world, this would keep America
Before his election, Wilson promoted American neutrality. He endorsed what he believed his Americans wanted, for this would get him elected into office. However, after his election, Wilson had a change of heart. A few events, such as the German sinking of the Lusitania and the Zimmerman telegram swayed President Wilson’s stance on the war. He started a movement toward war. A large variety of pro-war propaganda was produced and American troops were sent to Europe to fight.
In the aftermath of World War I, during the years 1917-1921, President Wilson advocated the Treaty of Versailles, which called for the principle of self-determination, the formation of a League of Nations, and general amnesty towards Germany, as the solution for peace. However, his unwillingness to compromise led to widespread disagreement. The opposition forces in the U.S. senate consisted of the reservationists, who were willing to ratify the Treaty of Versailles with amendments, and the irreconcilables, who refused to join the League of Nations under any circumstances. If President Wilson was only willing to modify the language of the treaty, ratification may have occurred.
President Woodrow Wilson’s “War Message” addresses the momentous event of breaking neutrality and declaring war on the German government. Wilson explains that America can no longer remain stagnant. He calls his audience to action, through a tactical combination of both structured logic and emotional inclusion. Wilson begins his deduction with several points, starting with the details of the submarine warfare and the “wholesale destruction of men, women, and children” endured not only by the American people but various other countries (2). Wilson asserts that neutrality is no longer possible since peace and the freedom of the individuals of the world were under a direct threat (5). He reassures the audience that although his intentions were the same and he fully intended on keeping the American people safe, avoiding the war and remaining uninvolved was no longer a reality (4).
In December 28, 1856, Thomas Woodrow Wilson was born and raised in a Presbyterian family, in Staunton, Virginia, during a time where the Civil War was occurring (Biography.com Editors, 2017). He graduated from Princeton and from the University of Virginia Law School and also “earned his Ph. D. in political science and history at Johns Hopkins University and entered upon an academic career. His thesis, Congressional Government, was published, launching a university career, with appointments at Bryn Mawr and Wesleyan” (Biography.com, 2017, para. 4). During his time in office, World War I had broken out and Wilson had declared the country neutral, “…believing that ‘to fight, you must be brutal and ruthless, and the spirit of the ruthless brutality
Wilson abandoned the imperialist policy and brought to the White House a new way of looking at America’s relations with the outside world. Wilson believed that the United States was the most politically enlightened in a sense under god, he felt that people throughout the world had their right to choose their own governments. Wilson was only protecting people rights to democracy.
David Kennedy’s Over Here: The First World War and American Society gives the reader an in depth description of American history during Americas involvement in World War I. The book covers from President Wilson’s war message to Congress on April 2, 1917 to the Armistice on November 11, 1918 pointing out major dilemmas within the country, whether they are political, social, or cultural. Kennedy starts the book out with a prologue that sets the scene. After the prologue, Kennedy jumps into explaining the war and the thoughts of the American people about the war that was carried into the battlefield. During this time, Wilson had just won his re-election of 1916, which was won by promising to keep America out of the war. So it was not hard to
Fear for the loss of the evolving economic trade, safety of the United States, and possibly even Woodrow Wilson’s personal agenda were a few of the factors that slowly led America into the First World War. “Many Americans had developed a sense of righteous entitlement, a belief that America was a unique, exceptional nation with a God-given right to expansion and power” (Riker-Coleman). The previously instated policy, the Monroe Doctrine, no longer held its pull as Wilson provided a new imperialistic way of seeing the United States’ potential. Wilson used his “stubborn moralism to guide the nation towards his ideals” (Norton
Wilson’s fourteen points summarise the quest for international cooperation in achieving and maintaining peace. However, this can be questioned as the first paragraph also suggests a self-centred approach taken by Wilson. The speech suggests that the USA is the only ones with the capacity to achieve such peace, the programme of the world's peace, therefore, is our programme; and that programme, the only possible programme. It reflects a world view and hierarchy, suggesting one big American alliance rather than an idea of international cooperation. This is also further illustrated on in Wilson’s speech, his concern for the safety of the USA is key in the way he treats countries such as Russia and Germany, and his disagreement with some of the terms in the Treaty of Versailles. In point six of the speech when dealing with Russia it talks of securing the best and freest cooperation of the other nations of the world. Wilson was careful in how he achieved peace, as he wanted to maintain relationships with countries within Europe, whilst keeping USA dominance ad not upsetting France and Clemenceau who wanted harsh treatment of Germany. This is illustrated in point eight of Wilson’s fourteen points.
During the 1920s, the United States was forced into war by the Germans. Germany, attacking and violating with the use of submarines, gave President Woodrow Wilson, who was president during World War I, no other option but to go into war. “We enter this war only where we are clearly forced into it because there are no other means of defending our rights.” (Wilson, 1917). He was a neutral person. Even though he wanted
To better understand the successes and failures of the 28th president of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, it is essential to define the image he portrayed to the American population during his presidency. Many Americans and historians will claim he was a man of impartiality and the one who led America into WWI. He had a very solid influence on Congress for the many domestic and foreign affair policies he endorsed. The goal is to illustrate how President Woodrow Wilson ran his presidency in the eyes of the American citizens. This will be done by examining the many facades that President Woodrow Wilson exhibited during his term as president. Upon researching the events of President Woodrow Wilson, it is clear that he was significant in moving our nation onward and supporting the American people in every which way possible.
From 1913-1917, Wilson and Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan had to deal with an unstable Mexican government. “Bryan was easily the leading opponent of imperialism and navalism and a pioneer in the movement to advance peace through arbitration and conciliation.” The Wilsonian foreign policy was the start of the concept that war should be avoided at all costs. This policy, named New Freedom diplomacy, was seen in the ordeal with Mexico.
The president proceeded with regard to his stance on neutrality. Aware of pacifists like Henry Cabot Lodge in the audience, Wilson appealed to those who had not forgotten his promises of keeping America out of war. He admitted that his assumption that armed neutrality would be adequate in “safeguarding his people from unlawful violence” was in fact impossible and he had failed to “assert our neutral rights with arms, our right to use the seas against unlawful interference, our right to keep our people safe against unlawful violence”
Wilson was born December 28th of 1856 in Staunton, Virginia. When he was only a year old, his family relocated to Augusta, Georgia and that is where Wilson remained until he was 14 years old. His father was a founder of the Southern Presbyterian church and instilled in Wilson the concept of leaving the world a better place than you found it. It was also in his youth that Wilson discovered his interest in the problems of modern democracy (Link, 2002). According to Kleine-Ahlbrandt (2017), his “passion for constitution-making came from his childhood experience in drafting a set of rules for a neighborhood club that met in a hayloft” (para. 1). He then applied these skills to other organizations he joined and made it his goal to reform their procedures.