How Does Adolf Loos Objectify Josephine Baker?

Whereas the women’s suffrage movements focused mainly on overturning legal obstacles to equality, the feminist movements successfully addressed a broad range of other feminist issues. The first dealt primarily with voting rights and the latter dealt with inequalities such as equal pay and reproductive rights. Both movements made vast gains to the social and legal status of women. One reached its goals while the other continues to fight for women’s rights.

An architect’s intention on how his or her design is to be viewed can be misconstrued in a variety of different ways. For example, dissecting the compositional and formal design of a building, with or without knowledge of the architect’s actual intent, is completely up to the interpretation of the person or persons researching or viewing the design. In my own research about the compositional and formal design of the Margaret Esherick House, designed by Louis Kahn, I have come to realize, with the help of scholarly resources, the direct intention of Louis Kahn’s design; in which this paper will come to analyze and explain. While compiling research about the Esherick house, I came across a very informative book, The Houses of Louis Kahn, written by George H. Marcus and William Whitaker. The Houses of Louis

Women have been active since the beginning of the early 1800’s and struggle until today’s day, to fight for equality. There were two women movement waves. The first wave was focused on the equality of the women by working on voting rights. The second wave from 1963 to 1982 concentrated on social issues. As in “Collective Action for Social Change”, Aaron Schutz and Marie Sandy stated in their book “women were tired of being second class citizens”. The civil rights movement spillover inspired women to create social movements by acting and building organizations focused on the issues that affected the women. The social issues were child care, domestic violence, contraception, and women’s health. One of the major topics that the feminists focused on was domestic violence that still exists in today’s day worldwide.

Women have historically had a rocky relationship with governmental, cultural, religious, and social rights. The Women’s Rights movement has been in effect since approximately 1792, with the publication of the first feminist work, “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, by British writer Mary Wollstonecraft” (“Women’s Rights Movement”). While social changes have occurred and more progressive laws have been put into place throughout the years, there is still not equality between the sexes. Additionally, gender roles in different countries differ greatly. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the major causes and concerns of the Women’s Rights movements throughout the decades, as well as denote the differences between more progressive societies and their less accepting counterparts.

Feminism is the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. In history, there have been several large acts of feminism that were needed for women's’ equality. The first major wave of feminism came around 1848, when the Seneca Falls convention took place and many women from around the United States went to discuss women’s rights. The outcome of the convention gave women ten new resolutions, while only one of them failed to pass, which was the women’s rights to vote. Seventy-two years after the Seneca Falls convention, another movement for feminism came into play, which was The Women’s Suffrage Movement. The Women’s Suffrage Movement started because while many of the American men who went to battle in world war one,

Feminism was separated into waves, the first, second, and third wave. Before it was called the first feminism, it was called the women’s rights movement. This movement began in the 1830s. First wave feminism is mostly known for women gaining the right to vote. During this time, Susan B. Anthony along with Elizabeth Stanton and Matilda Joslyn Gage wrote a 1500-page anthology called The History of Women’s Suffrage (Conger). Out of all the women who helped write a piece of it, only one was a woman of color; Sojourner Truth. Women were also fighting for the right to claim land, have trade rights or any other kind of economic freedom.

Leon Krier was criticised for publishing a costly monograph on Albert Speer’s architecture (1985)in which, while acknowledging the crimes of the Nazis and the man, Krier nonetheless claimed the book’s only subject and sole justification was “Classical architecture and the passion of building” (cited by Jaskot, ‘Architecture of Oppression’, 2000). Discuss this claim, the controversy and the issues (historical, philosophical and ethical and possibly others) they raise. Can architecture, Classical, Modern or otherwise, be autonomous from politics and valued independently of the circumstances of politics and history that adhere to it?

Feminism in a nutshell solitary word is: equality- a basic human right that has been the basis of every social movement throughout history and history to come. In one way or another, every ethnicity, race, and gender has been oppressed in some form. All of the “-isms” have fought to shed light and bring about change to these “lesser” groups. Feminists are no exception. Feminism has many branches: radical feminism, cultural feminism, liberal feminism, anti-porn feminism, pro-sex feminism, third-wave feminism, womanism, and many more. However to keep this paper readable in a sitting or two, we’ll focus on first and second wave feminism including important figure heads, projects or social events, goals of each group, when they happened, and who opposed or criticized these groups.

Lena, one of the characters in Amy Tan’s The Joy Luck Club, works in her husband’s thematic restaurant design architecture firm. When Harold, her husband, leaves his job at another architecture firm, Lena assures him he can create an innovative business, and gives him ideas that provide the foundation for his firm. Lena’s story relates to the article "Occupy Le Corbusier: will a silent majority rise against architecture's elite?” by David Brussat. Brussat laments about the minority control in architecture “whose tastes are diametrically opposed to those of the public.” These “partisans of modern ugliness” build modern architecture which is harmful for the environment and appalled by the public. This article provides an opposition to Lena’s

On his book on Modern Architecture, Curtis writes that modern architecture was faulted for it’s “supposed lack of ‘recognizable imagery’” towards the end of the 1970s. This statement supports the idea of Jencks’ double coding where architects must now make

Using the quote by Habermas as a starting point, select up to two buildings designed in the twentieth century and examine what ‘sudden, shocking encounters’ they have encountered, or created. Analyse the building’s meanings as a demonstration of an avant-garde, or potentially arriere-garde, position.

This book was written by Juhani Pallasmaa with regard to ‘Polemics’, on issues that were part of the architecture discourse of the time, i.e. 1995. It is also an extending of ideas expressed in an essay entitled “Architecture of the seven senses” published in 1994.

Different architects have different styles because they are trying to get at different things. Architecture is not just about making something beautiful anymore, it is about trying to get across a set of ideas about how we inhabit space. Two of the most famous architects of the twentieth century, one from each side, the early part and the later part up until today each designed a museum with money donated by the Guggenheim foundation. One of these is in New York City, it was designed by Frank Lloyd Wright. The other is in bilbao, Spain, and it was designed by Frank Geary. My purpose of this paper is to interrogate each of these buildings, glorious for different reasons, to show how each architect was expressing their own style.

Architecture is among the few careers that are usually considered male dominated sectors. This is because there are very few if any, ladies that have taken the trouble to dare venturing into this well rewarding but involving discipline. Zaha Hadid is the pioneer woman architect who rose to challenge the chauvinistic attitude regarding the gender affiliation to certain careers. The Iraqi-Briton lady, born in Baghdad in 1950 was until her death known for her sweeping curves and ravages that were exorbitant among other architectural works. Although her initial years were really tough as she had to work extra hard even to have her first design built, she relentlessly fought to put her unique designs on the map across the globe in the early 1990s. Zaha Hadid left a rich legacy, which will take eons to break as she was the pioneer female architect to be awarded the protuberant Pritzker Prize. This was after she had showcased her splendid artwork meant for the construction of the famous Opera House found in Guangzhou, China together with the Aquatics Center, which was used for the first time in the London Olympics in 2012. This research paper delves in her life history as an architect with curves as strong as steel, her accomplishments as well as her disappointments.

Throughout the course of this module I found myself to have grown tremendously in terms of my understanding of architecture as a profession. I have been introduced to the main principle of architectural practice in a broad sense along with its relationship to other related disciplines. I have gained an introduction to professional responsibility and ethics through real life examples. I received talks from architects, engineers, landscape architects, and planners. I have gained an introduction to the vast world of reflective thinking. On one particular occasion we were offered a critical comparison with medical ethics. Team discussions and critical thinking have been an essential element of my studies. The seven lectures, talks and seminars,