Vigilante justice has fascinated readers for years. The idea of committing crimes for what the character believes to be a worthy cause brings up arguments about whether the character is justified in doing so. Stephen R. Lawhead’s Hood, and Agatha Christie’s And Then There Were None, present the reader with the same idea of characters using vigilante justice to sort out cases that can not be touched by the law. In And Then There Were None, Lawrence Wargrave acts as a judge and sets up an elaborate trap to punish people who committed crimes that the law would not be able to deal with. He lures them on to Soldier Island under the pretense that they are going there to do certain jobs for the “owner” of the property U.N. Owen, and then kills them …show more content…
At the beginning of Hood Bran does not care about his people and is only focused on not becoming a king like his father. Because of this, Bran runs away from his kingdom, Elfael, to escape his responsibility. However, after becoming injured Bran realizes that he needs to go save his kingdom. Bran sees that his people are suffering and he realizes that he’s not just saving his kingdom but also his people’s home. Soon after Bran heals he goes to Cel Craidd where he “... spent most of the day getting to know the people of Cel Craidd, the hidden heart of the greenwood. A few folk of Elfael, but many were from other cantrefs - chiefly Morgannwg and Gwent, which had also fallen under Norman sway. All, for one reason or another, had been forced to abandon their homes and seek refuge of the wood. He talked to them and listened to their stories of loss and woe, and his heart went out to them” (Lawhead 292). Since Bran cares so much about his people, he has a legitimate reason to use vigilante justice to take back the money from the people who wronged him to save Elfael. Not only does Bran want to save Elfael for his people, but also for his mother. Bran’s mother passed away when he was young, and his father was a harsh king that took away most of the joy that his mother had brought to the kingdom. When Bran is thinking about why he want’s to save Elfael …show more content…
Ever since Lawrence Wargrave was a child he has had a want to kill. However, his wish to kill was combatted by the idea that the innocent must not suffer. In his old age, Wargrave becomes restless, and his job as a judge does not satisfy his desire for murder and justice. In order to punish people whose crimes the law is not able to deal, with he says, “I must-I must-I must-commit a murder! And what is more, it must be no ordinary murder! It must be a fantastical crime-something stupendous-out of the common! In that one respect, I have still, I think, an adolescent’s imagination. I wanted something theatrical, impossible!” (Christie 287). When Lawrence Wargrave kills the ten people on Soldier Island, he does so by stepping outside of the law and taking matters into his own hands, but as one can see in the quote above, he only does so in order to satisfy a selfish desire that he wishes to fulfilled before he dies. Not only does Lawrence Wargrave kill ten people, but he leaves the public not knowing what happened on soldier island and not knowing why ten people who are supposedly innocent are found dead. A quote from the epilogue in And Then There Were None reads, “When the sea goes down, there will come from the mainland boats and men. And they will find ten dead bodies and an unsolved problem
In conclusion, The People of Missouri bring the charges of 2nd Degree Murder, Endangering the welfare of a child, and Armed Criminal Action against Mr. Merridew. As previously stated, he participated in the murder of Simon, as well as the wielding of a spear with the intent to commit some sort of a crime using it, and the general lack of concern for the wellbeing of the other children on the island; these crucial details The State believes should be enough to charge him with the aforementioned crimes, and establish justice for the victims, once and for
The main character of this book is a judge who decides to take the law into his own hands and punish those who the law cannot touch. He is a skillful planner and able to keep himself from appearing to have a mental disability in front of others. This book could be told very well from the point of view of the master of the Emma Jane fishing trawler who found the letter enclosed in a bottle in the epilogue. The master of the Emma Jane fishing trawler could have sent the letter to Scotland Yard and asked about the case. The Scotland Yard could have filled him in on the details of the case and their previous thoughts concerning the Soldier Island mystery. This version of the story would be limited to one to two speakers instead of over ten.
“The third stage of narrative development was characterized by the appearance of rogues… relying on cleverness more than force, and motivated more by profits than by passion” (Williams 14). Rogues defied whatever came in between their pursuit, whether it be law or authority (Williams 14). In the third stage of criminal literature, the protagonists were all rogues despite of their unlawfully ways, they “aroused reader sympathy” (Williams 16). Williams described these rogues as “outsiders, existing apart from the social structure either by choice or by fate” (William 16). He also described these rogues as “individualistic, opportunistic, self-reliant” as well as “defiant of authority and entirely free” (Williams 16). William argues that the evolution of these narratives took place in three stages: the first being the “early execution sermons and final confessions”, the second being “the incomplete narratives of life and, finally the full length rogue narrative” (Williams 17). Williams’ article describes how criminal literature changed from “promoting obedience, [to] encouraged defiance” (Williams
Edmund never thought he would leave his family. However, the “gold fever” struck, and the adventurer in him wanted to leave so he could provide a better life for his family. On May 9th,
Fletcher’s literary allusion to Shakespeare’s Henry VI defines the underlying social circumstances that define the validity and invalidity of crimes of passion that occur within certain legal
Another example of weapons in Beowulf references to arms and armor, very accurate to the Anglo-Saxons’ traditional shields and weapons. “Then Hrothgar's thane leaped onto his horse and, brandishing a spear, galloped down to the shore; there, he asked at once: 'Warriors! Who are you, in your coats of mail, who have steered your tall ship over the sea-lanes to these shores? .... Never have warriors, carrying their shields, come to this country in a more open manner. Nor were you assured of my leader's approval, my kinsmen's consent. I've never set eyes on a more noble man, a warrior in armour, than one among your band; he's no mere retainer, so ennobled by his weapons.’... The boar crest, brightly gleaming, stood over their helmets: superbly tempered, plated with glowing gold, it guarded the lives of those grim warriors. ... Their byrnies were gleaming, the strong links of shining chain-mail chinked together. When the sea-stained travelers had reached the hall itself in their fearsome armour, they placed their broad shields (worked so skillfully) against Heorot's wall. Then they sat on a bench; the brave men's armour sang. The seafarer's gear stood all together, a grey tipped forest of ash spears; that armed troop was well equipped with weapons. .... in common we all share sword, helmet, byrnie, the trappings of war.” (Levick, 1)
Grendel’s mother is saddened and angered when she finds out her son is dead and proceeds to Herot: “But a monster still lived, and meant revenge.”(Beowulf, page 56). Vengeance is the cause of destruction and that is what Grendel’s mother wants to do to the men of
She immediately senses Edmund’s jealousy and utilizes it to entrap the other three children. She offers Edmund anything he wants, he asks for Turkish delights, which she in turn delivers. She then tells him that he could be king and his siblings will be his servants, which is extremely appealing to Edmund. Edmund agrees to deliver his siblings and thus betrays them for worldly desires. “Edmund’s greed gets the better of his judgment; Proverbs 23: 1-3 cautions, when you sit to dine with a ruler, note well what is before you, and put a knife to your throat if you are given to gluttony. Do not crave his delicacies, for that food is deceptive” (Ditchfield 51).
This paper will present a compare and contrast of the short story, "Witness for the Prosecution" to the screenplay of the same name written by Agatha Christie. The focus of the similarities and differences will be, a review of the characters and the story.
In Margret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and William Shakespeare’s King Lear it is evident that the punishment of innocent individuals by evildoers catalyzes violence thus, culminating in the disruption of society.
Written by Mystery’s number one best selling author, this book is promised to keep you on the edge of your seat. Ten people are brave enough to venture out to an island, invited by a unknown host that is nowhere to be found. The guests have nothing in common except a wicked past. Their fate is sealed by a murder that kills each of the guests off one by one, and only the dead are above suspicion. In the novel And Then There Were None written by Agatha Christie, the mystery elements that were used were: main conflict, setting, characterization, and the author’s techniques of giving clues.
The trial of Tom Robinson is central to our understanding of racial and social prejudice in Maycomb. Harper Lee uses Tom Robinson's 'crime' to bring tensions in the town to a head and the author uses the trial as a way of making the ideas behind such tensions explicit for the reader.
Homicide always will be an aspect of life, whether it is in the 16th century, 21st century or in the future. At times of extreme stress, people may turn to murder as an outlet of a greater problem they cannot fix or control. Presently, homicide has a greater value in society due to popular culture references through the media such as television, film and writing; society constantly has homicide and murder in the subconscious. In David M. Buss’ findings in The Murderer Next Door: Why the Mind is Designed to Kill,
At 1:30 in the morning on 30 March I was awakened by sharp, unfriendly knocks at my door, the unmistakable signature of the police. ‘The time has come,’ I said to myself as I opened the door to find half-a-dozen armed security policemen. They turned the house upside down, taking virtually every piece of paper they could find. I was then arrested without a warrant, and given no opportunity to call my lawyer. They refused to inform my wife as to where I was being taken. I simply nodded at Winnie; it was no time for words of comfort.(pg.239)
Thick, flowing, hot, and necessary for life; they say that it is thicker than water, blood. Many would reference family to one’s blood, blood that binds us in all, blood that reminds us that we are one unit. If this blood of life is so uniting as many think then why is it so easy for some to betray our own? In The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe C. S. Lewis (1950), Edmund one of the four siblings to enter the wardrobe, is found by the Witch. He is convinced that she is on his side besides his own misgivings of her. It is this, Edmunds betrayal of his siblings that strikes me the most. As a sibling of four myself I wonder how people are able to dismiss their blood and act so selfishly. How is Edmund capable of acting so selfishly, why is he so shifty all the time, and why does he feel compelled to lie to his family?