preview

How Does Arthur Miller Use Scapegoat In The Crucible

Decent Essays

In the Crucible, Arthur Miller uses scapegoat to display one’s desire to avoid taking responsibility for their wrongdoings. When Reverend John Hale comes over to discover what ails Betty, he begins to question Abigail about the dancing in the forest mentioned to him by Reverend Parris. Abigail begins by claiming that it was simply dancing. However, as the questioning becomes more serious, she blames Tituba for making her dance and drink blood. She continues to point the blame at Tituba, proclaiming, “She sends her spirit on me in church; she makes me laugh at prayer!” (Miller 41). Abigail realizes how serious her actions are, and how great the consequences can be. Dancing unclothed and laughing at prayer is sinful and condemned by the church. …show more content…

As trials are being conducted in the Salem meeting house, John Proctor enters, bringing Mary Warren and a testament of ninety-one townspeople to claim the innocence of those convicted of witchcraft. Danforth questions Proctor’s intentions. He fears that his purpose is to undermine the court. He shares his concern, explaining, “A person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there is no road between.” (Miller 87). Danforth’s strong will and great faith in the court result in an ignorance that prevents him from being open minded to any other possibility. He does not believe that one can disagree with the court without seeking to overthrow it. Danforth’s use of fallacy of the false alternative forces the people of Salem to unquestionably agree with the rulings and executions conducted by the court. For if they don’t, they will risk being accused of seeking to overthrow the court. Moreover, Miller’s use of the device points out others’ ignorance towards the complexity of the situation, displaying how they only view the problem as a black or white matter. The use of this device contributes to the plot by revealing that things aren’t always as they seem. By forcing others to choose from only two options, it also creates an inner conflict of believing in what one holds to be true in their heart or what is …show more content…

As John and Elizabeth Proctor discuss the recent issue of witchcraft in Salem, Giles Corey and Francis Nurse rush in appearing troubled. They both claim that their wives have been wrongly convicted of witchcraft and have been taken to jail. Giles explains that Mr. Walcott once had a pig that died right after he purchased it from Mrs. Corey. He continues by mentioning how his wife informed Mr. Walcott that his pigs won’t live long unless he feeds them. Giles share Walcott’s conviction against his wife, exclaiming, “Now he goes to court and claims that from that day to this he cannot keep a pig alive for more than four weeks because my Martha bewitched them with her books!” (Miller 68). Giles Corey understands that Mr. Walcott is using only one instance to justify why his pigs are dying. He acknowledges that Mr. Walcott has manipulated the words of his wife and taken her interest in books to draw his own conclusion with no real evidence. Instead of searching for a rational reason to explain the death of his pigs, he simply chooses an explanation which brings the least amount of scrutiny upon his own failure, even though such an explanation is completely irrational. Mr. Walcott’s hasty generalization has come back to hurt Mrs. Corey and put Mr. Corey in a state of distress as he struggles to prove her innocence. Additionally, the use of hasty

Get Access