How Does Australia Have A Codified Constitution

There are various strengths of the UK constitution; these include the fact that the constitution is flexible, it protects the rights of citizens and finally it gives power to the executive. The UK and its constitution, in my opinion, is a very strong unit, this being shown through the points listed above and consequently explained below.

The Advantages and Disadvantages of an Unwritten Constitution in the UK The UK has an unwritten constitution unlike the U.S.A. Instead Britain's laws, policies and codes are developed through statutes, common law, convention and more recently E.U law. It is misleading to call the British constitution unwritten; a more precise form of classification would be un-codified. This means that the British constitution has no single document, which states principles and rules of a state. However, The British constitution clearly sets out how political power is allocated and where it is legally located. The British constitution is still visible and it defines composition and powers of the main offices and

Britain, to begin with, has no written constitution due to the country’s own constitutional structure’s stability. It remains uncodified, yet it’s legal sources stem from Acts of parliament, European Union law, equity and common law,. Therefore the varying powers of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law will be considered against these sources.

The UK’s unwritten constitution, formed of Acts of Parliament [AoP], Royal Prerogative [RP], Constitutional Convention [CC] and Case Law [CL], prompts much debate about the ease of which constitutional change can be introduced. A written constitution is, by definition and practice, hard to alter however it remains to be seen whether it is any easier to change an unwritten

The Constitution can be easily viewed by all which enables everyone the ability to learn of their rights as American citizens. When the Constitution was constructed in 1787, it formed the foundation and structure for the United States' federal government. The Constitution was written to last and therefore is not easily altered as it requires moving through each branch of government. Due to the fact that Britain's constitution is not codified, it is far more flexible when in comparison to the United States Constitution. This is not to say that Britain is able to effortlessly make changes, as there are restrictions imposed by European Union

A constitution is a set of rules which may be written or unwritten, establishes the distribution of power in a political system, the limits of government jurisdiction, the rights of citizens and the method of amending the constitution itself. An uncodified constitution is unwritten, or at least not written all in one document. The constitution in the UK is found in a variety of sources which are mainly statute and common law, conventions and traditions, European law etc. There are arguments for the UK to both retain an uncodified constitution and to change this to a codified constitution like the USA. Some of the arguments for retaining the uncodified system are that; codification produces

It is necessary for the better understanding of the topic to discuss briefly codified and uncodified constitution and give definitions for both of them. According to Heywood (2013), a codified constitution is a single legal document that is popularly known as a ‘written constitution’ and that contains key constitutional provisions. However, the traditional approach is to distinct written or codified constitutions with unwritten or unсodified constitutions. Ryan and Foster (2014) notify that unсodified constitution is made up of rules from different sources. In other words, it is not a single document. Also, Finer, Bogdanor and Rudden (1995) describe an uncodified constitution of the United Kingdom as indeterminate and indistinct. According to Garner, Ferdinand and Lawson (2009), only three liberal democracies that are Israel, New

The British constitution is flexible in nature, which has allowed for the development of this country over centuries without the need for a fully codified constitution. I

A written constitution is precisely a charter that has been codified, in that the rules and regulations that citizens / individuals must abide by are stated in a single document format. Although elements of the UK constitution are written e.g. the statute law, sections of

This paper aims to present Dicey’s formulation of Rule of law; its fallacies ; its applicability in modern times; and Rule of law & The Tinkerbell Effect as analysed by Cameron Stewart.

There are several unique attributes in the unwritten constitution of the United Kingdom. A fundamental detail is that the Parliament reigns supreme while acting as the ultimate legislative branch. There are no documented constitutions detailing laws that are overruling and therefore higher in rank compared to other Acts of Parliament, therefore the British courts are only allowed to construe statutes. They may not overrule or declare them invalid for being contrary to the constitution and therefore unconstitutional. The process that includes a constitutional law is edited, repealed or legislated has similarities with other Act of Parliaments, despite the subject of the situation (British Library).

Before the 1970s, Dicey’s view that ‘no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the

A constitution can be written or unwritten. Written constitutions are entrenched, thus it is difficult to amend the constitution. For example after the gun incidents in America, some of society has urged the gun laws to be changed however they are still the same. An unwritten constitution in contrast is more flexible and can be changed if needed for example in the UK, gun laws have changed numerous times. A constitution also states the principles of a country, which everyone must accept and follow and it helps establish how that country is to be ruled or governed. A constitution is a necessity to a country because without one there would simply be chaos and anarchy. In addition, ‘as power tends to corrupt, we need to be protected from those in government, and this protection is provided by a constitution’ (Heywood, 2011a p.167).

Constitution is the basic principles and laws of a nation, state or social groups that determine the powers and duties of the government and guarantee certain rights to the citizen (Merriam-Webster online dictionary, n.d). In other words, it is a set of guidelines for a government to exercise the given power.

In order to state whether I am in favour of this statement or not, it is important to understand the statement itself. Constitution is a set of rules standardising the power and duties of a country 's government as well as the rights of its individuals. Currently constitutions come under two key terms; 'codified ' and 'uncodified ' constitutions. The UK and countries like Israel and New Zealand are a prime example of uncodified constitutions but that is not to say it is unwritten. Uncodified constitution is one that is made up of numerous written sources. Magna Carta , the Bill of Rights , Act of Settlement and Parliament Acts are among those sources used by the UK. Due to the existence of many written sources it would not be accurate to refer to the UK constitution as 'unwritten ' instead a more suitable word that can be used is 'uncodified '. Uncodified follows the normal processes for enacting statute law in order to alter or eradicate, the constitution therefore there is no judicial authority. Codified constitution on the other hand, is one that is entrenched and has key constitutional provisions collected within a single document. This type of constitution is referred to as a written constitution. The USA constitution, as an example, was drafted around as lon200 years ago and lays down the rights of American citizens and sets out the power of the government in place. Malcolm Walles described USA 'smoke of gun powder ' and the UK constitution 'appeared out of