How Does Civil Disobedience Have A Positive Impact On Society

civil disobedience method against Britain. Gandhi was arrested twice, then fasted for long periods of

Gandhi was an Indian lawyer, politician, social activist and writer who would lead the independence movement of India to free the country of British rule (“Mahatma Gandhi,” 2017). He would prove that a single person could change the course of history and take on the entire British Empire. Gandhi’s principles of nonviolence and civil disobedience are attributed to his success in gaining independence for India. The act of passive resistance allowed Gandhi to generate more support for his movement for independence while making it difficult for the British to find reasons to arrest them. He argued that although violence could be more effective than peaceful

British rule was tough on many Indians. Gandhi, an Indian born lawyer, believed in freedom and peace for his people. He once experienced racism when he was kicked out of a train in Europe. He changed people’s point of view without breaking the law, which was tough for him. Gandhi made his nonviolent movement work through the use of determination, peaceful civil disobedience, and being a powerful leader.

The  Civil Rights Movement is a substantial example of civil disobedience for the reason that  they were peacefully protesting while accepting their consequences.  On the other hand, people today believe that they're protesting peacefully however, peace can lead to violence and take away the credibility of their cause. Causing destruction in their community, where civil disobedience impacts society negatively because the situations get out of hand that cause chaotic cases which involves brutality.

Throughout history, violent reformation movements were traditionally used, but non-violence has been proven just as effective. Gandhi was one of the first to use peaceful resistance and civil disobedience to successfully change India. Civil Disobedience is the active refusal to obey laws set by the government with Nonviolent resistance and respectful disagreement. He used this concept to fight off not only the colonial rule but also racial discrimination and social divisions such as the untouchables in society. Mohandas Gandhi was born in India in 1869. At the age of 19 he went to London to study Law and he was impressed by English laws.His ambition to gain India's independence of all class, wealth, and educational distinction was successful.

Typically, when civil disobedience comes up, we look to the long line of heroes who put their lives on the line to help define what civil disobedience meant and how it could be successfully used in order to effect change. Gandhi, Susan B. Anthony, M.L. King and Mandela, are among the many men and women who fought great injustices in the past by taking a stand and calling attention to an unjust law. They used civil disobedience against the established order of things as a tool to not only

In Gandhi’s On Civil Disobedience speech he said, “ We made it clear to the government that we would never bow to the outrageous laws.” He fought for Indians in South Africa for seven years and helped India gain their independence from the British in 1947. If it was not for Gandhi who knows if India would have gain their independence. Although India did suffer from internal turmoil as religious factions fought for power, circumstances could have been much worse for people who lived in India if Gandhi did not stand up for what he believed in and did what he

Civil disobedience is one of the most peaceful ways to protest an unjust law in a free society and allows individuals to bring a law under public scrutiny. Free societies allow every citizen to make their opinion known and published, but if an important opinion is published in a smaller newspaper, it may not receive much attention or consideration. Civil disobedience is necessary because it brings attention to injustice by actively demonstrating oppression and mistreatment. The phrase "actions speak louder than words" is common, but not only do actions speak louder than words, but throughout history they have proven to be the only main way to push others in a society to action.

Another prominent user of civil disobedience was Mahatma Gandhi, who protested the British Raj in India. Gandhi led a policy of “non-cooperation” with British officials from 1920 until early 1922, which landed him in jail for sedition. He later led his famous Salt March and was arrested several more times for leading non-violent movements against the oppressive British rule before India gained its independence. In both cases positive change occurred from resistance to establish laws, in one case helping a group gain equal status in society and the other creating a new, free

Gandhi was a peaceful protester that was very defiant to the British law. The methods he used were simple, effective, and easy. He would protest in a non-violent, non-cooperated way to get more freedom from the British government. He wouldn´t have any violence against the British even though the British had really harsh laws. For example in the movie, he made every indian not work for the British.

Civil disobedience positively impacts a free society for several reasons. Not everything the government does will be accepted by those who know their rights. Protesting peacefully can bring a nation together and get the unimaginable accomplished just by unity. For example, Dr. King practiced protesting without the use of violence and today he is known as the most influential civil rights activist to ever live. He led peaceful marches with thousands of comrades, holding signs condemning the nation of all of the racial injustice.Change just can't happen over night, one must persevere and stand up for what is right no matter what people say. Without people like Dr. King we would still be living in a very much racist white driven world. We must

Gandhi used non violent civil disobedience to defy the British government and cause an uproar to win India’s independence.

Civil disobedience is the "refusal to obey governmental demands or commands especially as a nonviolent and usually collective means of forcing concessions from the government" as defined by the Merriam Webster dictionary. In my opinion, civil disobedience can both positively and negatively affect society-depending on the circumstances. For example, committing the act of civil disobedience in response to a war can help the government make better decisions based on this domestic feedback. Other forms of civil disobedience, such as disagreeing with the law against stealing, would not be helpful in anyway and would simply anger many people including police officers. The main difference between these two examples is the fact that one law is an understood

Civil disobedience is a peaceful way to protest issues. Some people believe that civil disobedience is not an effective method for change because it isn't legal. Others think that civil disobedience is an effective way to make change because it is a way to protest a problem without violence. I believe that civil disobedience is an effective way to make social changes. “Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless and corrupt.”

I believe that from a historical perspective, civil disobedience has had both a positive and negative impact on public policy. One of the first big examples of civil disobedience working was when Gandhi “fought”, through public protest, to free India from British rule. He used the idea of civil