How Does Elie Wiesel Use Rhetoric In Nobel Acceptance Speech

Wiesel does a wonderful job with his use of pathos throughout the speech by making the audience reflect on his words and creates a strong emotional reaction for what is being said. From being a survivor of the Holocaust, one of the darkest parts of history as well as the most shallow times for humanity. Immediate sympathy is drawn from the audience. When he states that himself endured the horrible conditions these people had to live in. He then explains to us that the people there, “No longer felt hunger, pain, thirst. They feared nothing. They felt nothing. They were dead and did not know it.” With saying this it brings forth feelings of guilt, one of the most negative emotions to accumulate a reaction towards these events. Also numerous people throughout the world long for world peace and to hear the inhumane acts that was once acted upon an innocent man, makes their stomach's sink. Wiesel defines its derivation, as “no difference” and uses numerous comparisons on what may cause indifference, as a “strange and unnatural state in which the lines blur.” Like good and evil, dark and light. Wiesel continues to attract the audience emotionally by stating this he is aware of how tempting it may be to be indifferent and that at times it can be easier to avoid

Elie Wiesel is known to be a deserving recipient of the Noble Peace Prize because as written in Pbs.org, Wiesel “was a witness for truth and justice…not with a message of hate and revenge, but one of brotherhood and atonement” (Egil Aarvik). Almost immediately, Wiesel’s trustworthiness will spark and the audience will feel an immense amount of admiration and trust for him and what he has to say since only a selected, amazing individuals have received the Nobel Peace Prize. The Nobel Peace Prize will serve as a message that the speaker has dedicated an immense amount of time for a greater good and to help others; it is without a doubt prestigious and respected award. Similarly, the reputation of Elie Wiesel and the fact that he advocates for peace and to save suffering victims around the world will make the audience conclude that he has had experience in humanitarian and peace attempts and organizations. As a result, Elie Wiesel’s reputation will without a doubt increase his credibility and authority throughout the text. The audience will be aware of his actions in the past and they will trust and admire Wiesel. The credibility and authority he has built through his reputation and public image will benefit him in regards to persuade his audience to kill indifference and help those who are still to this day suffering. His public image is seen as one of a dedicated individual who is a leader and encourages others to peacefully stop intolerance and indifference and that builds his credibility in the eyes of the

Elie Wiesel’s speech falls into the deliberative genre category, and was designed to influence his listeners into action by warning them about the dangers indifference can have on society as it pertains to human atrocities and suffering. The speech helped the audience understand the need for every individual to exercise their moral conscience in the face of injustice. Wiesel attempts to convince his audience to support his views by using his childhood experience and relating them to the harsh realities while living in Nazi Death Camps as a boy during the Holocaust. He warns, “To be indifferent to suffering is to lose one’s humanity” (Wiesel, 1999). Wiesel persuades the audience to embrace a higher level of level moral awareness against indifference by stating, “the hungry children, the homeless refugees-not to respond to their plight, not to relieve their solitude by offering them a spark of hope, is to exile them from human memory”. Wiesel’s uses historical narrative, woven with portions of an autobiography to move his persuasive speech from a strictly deliberative genre to a hybrid deliberative genre.

Through a wide variety of rhetorical devices the orator, Wiesel, attempts to instill a form of guilt into his audience, as he makes his desperate plea to the American people, and to the president, to take a stand against the great evil he witnessed. Wiesel uses apostrophe, juxtaposition, and causal analysis to ensure he effectively drives his message home, implementing them each in their own way to ensure the necessary ethos and pathos is built so that Mr. Wiesel can sway his audience to his opinion, and ultimately encourage them cancel the visit to Bitburg, achieving his final rhetorical goal.

“Do I have the right to accept this great honor on their behalf?... I do not.” Wiesel said this in his “Acceptance Speech”, startling everyone. But Wiesel as a point? Should one person be able to take credit of a memory that millions will never have any more?

In that part it also uses pathos about children and them dying. It accomplishes that it is used for a more dramatic and standing out effect. Saying that this is the part it wants to be the most important in the speech and to listen to it and do something about it. “Do we hear their pleas? Do we feel their pain, their agony?..” This is an example of asking yourself questions. It makes you actually question these things and makes you wanna do something about. Having you feel bad for not doing anything to help the children and to stop the wars. Wiesel is trying to get people to not repeat the past and to focus on the future on trying to help the children. It also talks about what it means to be a human and no not deny people if they need help. If we do that then we have lost what it means to be human and lost all our

In Elie Wiesel's speech he touches on the topics of the causes, effects, and lessons from the holocaust, our duties as a human being, and finally how we can achieve peace for ourselves and everyone around the globe. In paragraph eight he states that, “…the world did know and remain silent.” Wiesel is referring to the general public of Germany as a whole. Wiesel also says that, “And action is the only remedy to indifference: the most insidious danger of all.” Which simply says by not doing anything this was allowed to happen. You can link that to how German citizens not spreading the word or opposed Hitler. How was Hitler so effective in getting all the Jew and other “undesirables”? German citizens would point the authorities to the Jews, homosexuals,

On April 12 1999 in Washington D.C., Elie Wiesel delivered a powerful speech called, “The Perils of Indifference”. He was invited by then President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton to give a speech for the Millennium Lecture Series hosted by the White House. He used various rhetorical devices to persuade his audience of the consequences of being indifferent to injustices. He used tone in his voice during very emotional portions of his speech. He also used examples of pathos, logos, and ethos throughout his speech to bolster his argument. Wiesel also used repetition in order to provide emphasis on certain words and to also deter define a term to the audience. He also used imagery to help the envision details to them that they may have not ever experience themselves. He also used anaphora and anadiplosis in his speech to help his points come across smoothly and to bring greater emphasis. By using these various rhetorical devices in his speech, Wiesel was able to give a memorable and convincing speech about not being indifferent to injustice.

Elie Wiesel talks about the dangers of being silent against a time of need, and how that will cause an event like the holocaust to happen again.

Elie Wiesel, distinguished author and Holocaust survivor, spoke of his experience at the Millennium event in 1999. This event was hosted by President Clinton where Wiesel spoke about his experience in the Holocaust to commemorate the closing Millennium. Aside from this great honor, Elie Wiesel worked at Boston University for some time and acquired many medals of recognition such as The United States Congressional Medal as well as starting The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity ("Elie Wiesel." ). Wiesel also won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1968 and his novel are incorporated in many High School educations. Elie Wiesel is an intense individual himself with a bitter tone and this method of rhetoric enhances his persuasion.

The first part of his speech is how he states how he is honored to accept the award but humiliated and ashamed of the reasoning behind why he is receiving this. Elie feels that he should not have the right to accept this great honor on the Jewish communities behalf and he thinks that they should all get the award and not him since no one should be able to speak on the behalf of the dead. He states that this honor belongs to all the survivors and their children and through all the Jewish people in honor of those whose destiny he has always identified. Not only does he say his remembrance of his conversation with his father of him asking him “Can this be true since it is not the middle ages anymore?” but also him stating how he is now picturing his little self turning to him and saying "Tell me, what have you done with my future? What have you done with your life?" Elie tries to reassure himself and say that he has tried and he is trying to keep his memory alive to help remember those who sacrificed their life and he has tried to fight those who would forget because if we forget we are guilty, we are accomplices. Elie also states how he swore to never remain quiet when there is something going on harmful to human beings indurancing

A speech that Elie Wiesel gave is called the Acceptance Speech. It is about learning to stand up for yourself and others, It is also about how much you change when you're in the concentration camps. Some people are quiet and stay to themselves. But some others are the ones who want to stand out and fight their way to freedom. During this speech someone says “Can this

Elie Wiesel’s words have been inspirational to many people throughout the world. On December 10, 1986, Wiesel received the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Norway. In his acceptance speech, Wiesel stated, “Wherever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion, or political views, that place must...become the center of the universe” (“Elie Wiesel - Acceptance Speech”). Elie Wiesel

He first argues that the Holocaust was an outrageous genocide of the Jewish people. He started each conversation off by asking the person if they knew who Adolf Hitler was. It is surprising to see how many people had no idea who he was. For those that did know, and saw him as a bad guy, he asked them if they would kill Adolf Hitler if they had a chance. Everyone unanimously agreed that they would, but when asked if they would kill his mother when she was

This essay discusses the plight of the Jews. The two texts used are ‘The Last Night’ written by Sebastian Faulks and the poem ‘Refugee Blues’ which is written by W. H. Auden. Both the texts talk about misery of the Jewish people being persecuted for their beliefs, due to Hitler’s regime. ‘Refugee Blues’ mainly focuses on the hardship of being Jewish and have been displaced, which provokes sympathy. Similarly, ‘The Last Night’ also focuses on the innocence of the Jewish people: it shows two young boys in their last few moments of freedom and how they suffer from being in the wrong place at the wrong time potentially leading to their deaths. I intend to demonstrate that both the texts employ a range of various language devices; some are similar