How Does Globalization Affect International Culture

Some argue that globalization will, on the long term, bring all cultures as a unique Western, if not Americanized, culture, while others argue that some cultures will persist in order to keep their own essence and therefore avoid the homogenization of all cultures. Alongside pure tradition, global conflicts, contradictory political regimes and the diversity of economic systems, some cultures are bound to face issues when trying to fully fit in a global western culture, and that is why cultures are adaptable to one another, but with some limits that we will express in this essay.

To what extent do you think the U.S.-Canadian magazine dispute was motivated by genuine desires to protect Canadian culture?

The negative effect of globalization on nearby culture is exacerbated by the day. It is developing with the exemption. It is always debilitating the thoughts, governmental issues and economy of countries. Since culture as a term is utilized to depict practically every human attempt; it is hard to draw a division between the true social activities deserving of exceptional defensive measure. This essay is an exploration of the effect of globalization on nearby societies with the Canadian Magazine Dispute as a core interest.

1. As the Canadian governmental committee put it, "magazines constitute the only national press .. in Canada, …..( it) can help foster in Canadians a sense of themselves." A legacy that is threatened by more than 100 US Magazines established in Canada. If the majority of magazines are printed in America, there will be no need for printing magazines in Canada. In an effort to preserve this identifying mark of Canadian identity, culminated into the Canadian magazine dispute. When thoroughly analyzed, America, the biggest foreign magazine contributor in Canada is to blame for the dispute. In an effort to monitor and control imports of foreign publications. Canada was only trying to protect what rightfully belongs to them.

The U.S.-Canadian magazine dispute was undoubtedly motivated by Canadian protectionism of their own culture. The source of the problem was Sports Illustrated Canada, a split-run magazine publisher, was producing material in the United States and sending it electronically to Canada so it could be printed as a Canadian periodical. The fact that Sports Illustrated Canada was rendered as Canadian rather than American allowed the periodical to offer tax deductions to Canadian advertisers, in turn taking away from the potential advertisement revenue available for other Canadian periodicals. The only reason this became a problem was because the originally Canadian periodicals couldn’t compete with the prices offered by the American magazines that

Written Assignment Unit 6 Samuel Zeratsion University of People The Canadian Magazine Dispute The US-Canadian Magazine Dispute was strongly motivated by genuine desire to protect foreign or split run publication magazine by the name of “Protecting Canadian culture”. Canadian federal government tried to protect its domestic magazine producers by adding significant new tax law to all advertisement revenue consider being the split-run publication magazine. The government of Canada was pressured to protect its local magazine producer industry market because of the Canadian consumer became interested in buying foreign or split run publication magazine.

To what extent do you think the U.S.-Canadian magazine dispute was motivated by genuine desires to protect Canadian culture?

1. To what extent do you think the U.S.Canadian magazine dispute was motivated by genuine desires to protect Canadian culture? I think the motivation of protecting any domestic cultural value of any country must be respected to protect their own personal rights. In addition, the values of cultural development without implications of any foreign country impose including Canadian cultural value. We have seen the conflicted between Canadian magazines against the foreign trades for many years that struggling to protect their own value because of dominant foreign development. This is one of our generational systemic cultural impacts that overtaking and dominate against other without considerations.

1. The dispute was motivated, to a small extent, by the genuine desire to protect the Canadian culture. That is because the government felt that the magazine companies which had a long history covering local news and employed a long chain of Canadians, couldn't be allowed to collapse. It would mean the disappearance and extinction of what some Canadians at, the, time, identified with.

The Canadian Magazine Dispute. 1. To what extent do you think the US Canadian dispute was motivated by a genuine desire to protect Canadian culture? In my view the dispute had nothing to do with a genuine desire to protect the Canadian culture. My reason for this opinion is premised on the basis that the onus to protect a people’s culture rests upon the citizens of a country. People should be the sole custodians of their culture. It is not the duty of the government to legislate laws that purportedly are meant to protect culture. The Canadian people have a right to choose what aspects of their culture they should maintain and what it is from other cultures that they should embrace. I believe that this is the height of any democracy, where people

“To what extent do you think the U.S.-Canadian magazine dispute was motivated by genuine desires to protect Canadian culture?”(Uopeopleedu, 2016)

The US-Canadian magazine dispute had absolutely nothing to do with any "genuine desire to protect Canadian culture". What is "Canadian culture" anyway. I'm sure if I ask a Franco-phone, an Anglo-phone and a Metis, I'll get three widely divergent answers that will never come close to compromise. The Canadian Government was merely seeking to protect the bank accounts of certain Canadian publishing wigs, bottom line.

I suspect that the real motive of the Canadian government was not to protect Canadian culture in this dispute with the US. But rather, it seemed to concern more with political and economic factors. As appeared in the article, the Canadian government finally gave in and went on to settle the dispute (The Levin Institute, [1]). To me, that seems somewhat irrational to suddenly give up on one’s culture like they did, when the US threated to retaliate with trade barriers. As a speculation, I believe the dispute was motived by political and economic concerns. The Canadian government was attempting to defend the local media from a total domination by foreign media since it implies that Canadian businesses will be paying foreign corporations to have their products and services advertised on a magazine, even when local magazines have the capacity to provide the same type of service. Simply put, the concern seems to be related to the higher outflows of capital.

After World War II, some ambitious leaders advocated the establishment of an effective mechanism to stabilize the world order. One of the ways to maintain the international order is to prevent the disintegration of the world economy (Seitz, 1995, p. 26). Under such a background, the World Trade Organization (WTO) was founded, and then accelerated the development of economic globalization. As there is an inseparable relationship between economy and culture, the more the trend of economic globalization accelerates, the faster the trend of various culture globalization blends (Seitz, 1995, p. 27). Collisions between various cultures may have different consequences. Some scholars think that the long-term results of culture clash might lead to

Globalization simply defined is the intensification of global interactions. The case studies we have studied depict two of the main types of globalization. Economic Globalization, which is the production, exchange, distribution, and consumption of goods and tangible services, and Cultural Globalization, the exchange of materials and symbols that represent facts, meaning values and beliefs. When Globalization occurs it usually has a major impact on indigenous cultures. Optimists or “champions” state that the relationship between culture and globalization has positive effects as it creates a balance between nations. Conversely, critics state that relationships between the two have negative effects, leading to the loss or deterioration of a