How Does Plato 's Allegory Of The Cave Illuminate The Value Of Philosophy?

Philosophy is a very important part of people’s lives. Philosophy is quite basically asking inquiries about existence, reality and nature of knowledge. To better understand philosophy we must look throughout history. Looking back through history helps better show what the philosophers thought during the time period in which they lived. The relativity of the theories, to the time period, is a very important factor in how efficient these theories they were. The first philosopher’s ideas to people today would be considered either very basic, or insane. Yet, in the time period they lived in, they were considered to be geniuses. Also, looking back through time and studying philosophers and what they believed can help create a better idea for

In the text “An Invitation to Philosophy” written by Bryan Magee, Magee defines two branches of philosophy based on two fundamental questions of philosophy, discusses the importance of reason in philosophy, and explains the difference between asking questions and the beguining of ‘doing’ philosophy.

When reading a philosophy text, the following would be a question a good student would ask while reading:

There are a number of universities in the United States that offer a liberal arts education. These particular universities encompass philosophy and theology as a part of their core curriculum. By taking such courses students are enabled to learn and understand more about the world around them and who they are. A question concerning the existence of God and the role of each individual in society gives rise to speculation. In his article “Why Study Philosophy and Theology”, Dr. Peter Kreeft makes a bold claim which indicates that “anyone who is simply not interested in philosophical questions is less than fully human…” He explains this claim by providing a continuous chain of arguments, in which each argument breaks down the proper reasoning behind why an individual should desire to learn about philosophy and theology. These arguments include the Goal of Education, the Big Picture, and Good Philosophy and Theology.

Philosophy (from Greek φιλοσοφία, philosophia, literally "love of wisdom"[1][2][3][4]) is the study of general and fundamental problems concerning matters such as existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language.[5][6] The term was probably coined by Pythagoras (c. 570 – c. 495 BC). Philosophical methods include questioning, critical discussion, rational argument and systematic presentation.[7][8] Classic philosophical questions include: Is it possible to know anything and to prove it?[9][10][11] What is most real? However, philosophers might also pose more practical and concrete questions such as: Is there a best way to live? Is it better to be just or unjust (if one can get away with it)?[12] Do humans have free

In general terms it is accepted that philosophy encompasses three elements: concern for knowledge, values ​​and being, or beliefs that the individual has about existence. In all these respects, philosophy uses intellectual processes as a method.

I believe Philosophy is taking a closer look into different details and trying to understand each detail more than you knew before. Many Philosophers would study the nature of humans and try to understand the way they act and display them self to the public. In the Republic, Socrates asked Cephalus if he made his fortune or did he inherited it. (64 Plato) Cephalus replied, and said that he inherited just as much money as he has made, so therefore he was very wealthy. Socrates was studying the human nature of Cephalus, because he then said that he did not act like the type of person that had a lot of money. Today as humans we do the same thing Socrates did, but we look into the way humans act and associate them with different labels. Unlike

In order to do this, philosophers critically analyze all aspects the world, from physical to metaphysical. Philosophy is important to study, it is what allows people to recognize when those in power are lying them to, it also drives people to create new technologies and move the world forward. The moon was once thought impossible to reach, if no one had ever questioned that humans wouldn’t have gone to the moon, the space shuttle may never have been created and the International Space Station never built. Without those that question the world and its possibilities humans as a whole would be no where near where we are developmentally, technologically and societally

Socrates and the sophists had completely polar theories regarding truths and absolutes. The sophist philosophy states, that people can't judge what is right or wrong regarding other people. Because, what is wrong for you might be right for them. They believed you should do whatever benefits you in that moment. Socrates totally refuted this idea. He believed that absolute truths and unchanging morals did exist. One of the views against the sophists was brought forth by Protagoras, he said, “How can this view be true when you could say that the sophist view isn't right for me, therefore I won't believe it.” and the sophists couldn't reject this because it's they're own philosophies. What was Plato's point in his allegory of the cave?

In the text “An Invitation to Philosophy” written by Bryan Magee, Magee defines two branches of philosophy based on two fundamental questions of philosophy, discusses the importance of reason in philosophy, and explains the difference among asking questions and the beginning of ‘doing’ philosophy.

Positive interaction with contemporary philosophical humanitarian community is not only through the exchange of knowledge and the dissemination of philosophical research, but also through the "philosophical discourse." therefore philosophical discourse as a concept is the "structure" intellectual or philosophical inherent in the means of expression in language, whether it is books, research articles, interviews or debates. And philosophical discourse can appear on the level of the individual (or a thinker, philosopher), on the level of certain groups in society (political parties or religious groups, for example),

Interpretation questions is the main purpose of a shared inquiry discussion, because interpretations will vary, stimulate engaged and lively conversation, and repeatedly appeal to the text for supporting evidence. Most questions raised in shared inquiry discussions - including the opening question - will be interpretive. Thus, interpretive questions are the primary tools a discussion leader creates to guide a group though the various levels of meaning that are present in writings selected for shared inquiry. composing questions about the text is the best preparation for discussion, because if forces the discussion leader to engage with the work and form some preliminary ideas about its meaning. It is helpful to encourage participants to also bring their own written interpretive questions to a discussion session; this will help them learn from and contribute to each

From Descartes onwards, the ultimate questions of philosophy were viewed as being epistemic in nature. The big questions in philosophy were about the relationship of the thinking subject to the

As I was attempting to brain storm for this assignment, I ran out of ideas so I decided to read the prompt again and again for inspiration and hopefully some new ideas. That is when I realized that the prompt itself had the answer that I was looking for. My answer was sitting there waiting for me in the last sentence of the prompt, “The question whether Philosophy is still necessary or not remains an intriguing question, triggering different position.” Philosophy is still necessary in our modern and scientific world today because Philosophy is the intriguing question that is triggered by several events in different positions in our daily lives. In our fast paced world today, people sometimes tend to want answers all the time without even having to ask questions and unfortunately, technology, media and social media have made that possible.

This essay is reflection about my understanding from what I have learned during this class about what philosophy is. Philosophy is a broad topic and can be hard to understand. What we learn is class about philosophy defiantly makes me think and makes my brain turn all the time, but so far, my understanding is that philosophy is the study of knowledge. It breaks down what everything is. Examples used in class are chariness, deskness, and the main one sued in class “cupness”.