How Does Spencer Use Ethos In Princess Diana

The mystery surrounding the death of the beloved Princess Diana has sparked an exhaustive investigation by theorists. There is many thoughts on her death, but there are also many facts everyone agrees with. For example, Diana’s death took place on August 31st, 1997 in Paris, France (Paprocki 100). That night Diana had enjoyed a romantic meal with her

Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer, gave a eulogy for her on September 6, 1997. In the eulogy he speaks of how much Diana meant to the people of not only England, but also the people of the world. Within the speech, the Earl becomes passionate about his sister and the things that she did during her life. One example that he gave was that on her birthday, she did not celebrate the day but instead was the guest of honor at a charity fundraising event. The speaker is Earl Spencer, the brother of the late Princess. The audience is all of the people who are

The writer of this entry was very informative about the death of Princess Diana. In some ways, they were pretty harsh in the way some things were worded. They tried to accuse people for the accident and also suggested that Diana was pregnant and engaged. I believe the entry didn’t have enough facts to make so many accusations. However, they perfectly informed the audience of the car accident and also Diana’s final resting place. Overall, the text could’ve been worded differently to achieve it’s purpose. The text isn’t rational and informs the reader of false reports.

Princess Diana was known as the “People’s Princess” and her legacy still carries on to this day.

A typical eulogy consists of praise, happy memories, stories, and positive personality features of the one deceased. In opposition, this particular eulogy had a negative tone regarding the sadness in her life, as well as blaming the royal family and the paparazzi for her untimely passing. This eulogy used aspects that most speeches, essays, and other forms of writing use, including pathos, ethos, logos, parallelism, imagery, and negative comments toward her unfortunate loss of life.

The death of the once beloved Princess of Wales was a tragedy to not only her loving country England, but all across the world. As soon as the fatal car accident occurred, Diana’s face scattered the covers of tabloids, newspapers, and the internet. She was a sensation to the public and her death was unbelievable. Princess Diana, the loving mother of her two sons, Prince William and Harry, was killed in deadly car crash on the last day of August, 1997. Even today, this tragic car accident leaves the general public overwhelmed and confused that a young, charming, global figure would be taken from this world at the young age of 36. As soon as the public learned of the former Princess of Wales’ passing, conspiracies began to circle out in the air

Lady Diana Spencer married Prince Charles on July 29th 1981 becoming Diana Princess of Wales and from this day onwards she became the most photographed woman of all time. Diana had a relationship with the media like no other. The media impacted all aspects of her life often dictating her life. Diana was called ‘the peoples princess’ (Tony Blair, 1997) because of the significant image that the media created of her participating in charitable acts, working hard and undergoing activities that royals had never done before. Diana made an effort to display herself as a positive figure through using the media to display the great relationships she had with an array of people and the things she did to continually be involved and in the public eye. Before marrying Prince Charles, Diana was a ‘normal teenager’ making her relationship with the media even more interesting to people around the world.

Everyone all over the world showed grief for Princess Diana’s death. The people started questioning the royal family why they didn’t raise the Buckingham palace flag half mast like you have done when someone dies. Believe or not the people were growing anger against the royal family they didn’t address the nation until days after the death. They criticized the Queen for not showing grief for her ex daughter in law’s death. Some people claimed that the Queen never showed any emotions and that she was devastated inside and had to be strong for her grandchildren. If she really cared about her grandchildren she would not contributed in planning Princess Diana’s death. While giving a live speech the Queen was very calm and relaxed. Some body experts claimed that she was upset while giving her speech and that she was not devastated. She showed anger towards Diana and did not meant the words she was saying in her speech. I do not believe in this, if she was truly devastated she would not be celebrating her anniversary months after Diana’s

This speech does have a purpose, which is to tell the whole world that Britain is united in grief and respect for Princess Diana. Unlike the previous text this one does a good job because it does not bore reader because the speech has a unique style of not telling its real purpose until the near end which forces people to listen to the whole thing. Also it knows the subject and the occasion and in which the two things interact nicely. Also the Queen knows her audience who are the people shocked by the devastating news. As a speaker the Queen uses soothing tone that make her look like she is just regular person in grief for her grand daughter and does not mention any negative details like, if she were to have one, which would be her rage against the photographers or the press. In conclusion there is not that much criticism for this text because the purpose can be identified really easily by the stylistic phrases and knowing all the key elements of rhetoric. Also one of the most important factors that make this text more effective is the shift from “I” to “Our”, this pronoun is significance because it demonstrate the speaker to connect with others which is a key element in persuasion or speech.

”(Good Housekeeping, 2011). Over Princess Diana’s life she achieved many things. The most memorable events in her

The True Diana Brother, Earl Spencer, in his Eulogy for Diana, describes the true person princess Diana was Spencer´s purpose is to honor his sister and reveal the Diana who contrary to the bestial person the media interpreted her to be. He elaborates by utilizing pathos, ethos, and irony in hope that he persuades the audience into contemplating Diana in his perspective. Spenser begins by Utilizing pathos by reflecting over his sister´s comprehension of way the media was always on the cast to find a negative outcome out of her good intensions. He writes “I don’t think she [understands] why her geniuenly good intentions [are] sneer[ing] at by the media . . . on the behalf to bring her down.”

He gives a very heartfelt speech that explains his (and many others’) sorrow for her loss, but also pays tribute to her, as well. Spencer describes her as beautiful, compassionate, but most importantly, human. Disregarding her royalty, Spencer reveals that Diana was no different than the average person. Though she was admired by many for her beauty and kindness, she had flaws. Spencer claims, “And here we come to another truth about her. For all the status, the glamour, the applause, Diana remained throughout a very insecure person at heart, almost childlike in her desire to do good for others so she could release herself from deep feelings of unworthiness, of which her eating disorders were merely a symptom. The world sensed this part of her character and cherished for her vulnerability, while admiring her for her honesty,”. Though these flaws can be looked at as “negative” characteristics, society accepted her for her honesty, and it was appealing to many that she was not so different than the typical person.

Death and the Maiden discusses Princess Diana, her media, and her public from the point-of-view of Maureen Dowd. Was Diana the “spendthrift of her own celebrity”? Is the media a market of vultures feeding off of Diana? Does the public actually have any remorse for the Princess? There is no right or wrong answers for these questions because they are merely opinionated.

Each morning I stuck my key into a small gold key hole into the back entrance of her residence. The residence was absolutely stunning. There were flowers with the most exquisite scent. The landscaping was ridiculous, it was sheer perfection. The grass was always trimmed to perfection as well. There was never a weed in between the cracks of the cement. The palace was extravagant. The whole palace was made of the finest materials, it was beautiful. The roof was even made of gold. Despite the royal family’s golden exterior with love for one another and their children, I saw the real Prince and Princess of Wales. I often had time to talk to Princess Diana, although she preferred when I called her Di ( Tompson 1). While Diana’s life was cut too

Whether it be confessional or imagist, poetry provides a way to define all emotions and express any suppressed feelings with a literary approach. Similarly, the confessional poem “The Colossus” by Sylvia Plath and the imagist poem “The Charge of the Light Brigade” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson both depict the emotional trauma caused due to the loss of lives. Plath’s poem “The Colossus” expresses the absence of her father and its impact on her life personally. Whereas, Tennyson’s narrative poem “The Charge of the Light Brigade” explores the grief of violence and sufferings of war due to the lost lives of many soldiers fighting in the war and the remembrance of their glory. The common use of vivid imageries and metaphors shape the theme of death and suffering in both of the poems. Plath and Tennyson show the contrasting ideas of loss and grief and how it changes the lives of individuals and how it forms the society as it is presently viewed.