In The Pearl by John Steinbeck proves that things are not always what they appear to be (illusion vs reality). People are not always the same .All doctors are not trustworthy, all priests are not selfless, and all magnificent things are not good. In this short novel, the illusion and the reality of the “cursed” pearl, the selfish doctor, and the manipulating priest will cause a devastating tragedy.Author and rationalist, Sanal Edamaruku, once said “For those in love with an illusion often refuse to accept reality.” The definition of illusion is “something that deceives by producing a false or misleading impression of reality” (dictionary.com). Illusions can be tempting, and at the time you may not even realize that an illusion is not a reality. …show more content…
Most people think that a priest would consider everyone equal, even himself because the bible says in James 2:9 “But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers ” Yet this doctor thinks of the villagers as children- “Children, he considered these people, and he treated them like children.” (27). When this priest heard of the magnificent and surely valuable pearl he first thought of himself and wanted the money for him and his church not the poor, starving villagers. He thought of “certain repairs necessary to the church.” (21) and he even tried to convince Kino to give himself money- “I hope thou wilt remember to give thanks,my son, to Him.”. Now why would this man refer to Kino as “my son” when earlier he thought of these people as children, he obviously wants Kino’s money. On page 46, Kino’s brother brings up a sermon that the priest makes every year, Kino had said “And the Father made it clear that each man and woman is like a soldier sent by God… But each must remain faithful tp his post.. else the castle is in danger from the assaults of Hell.” The priest is manipulating and trying to control everyone by make sure they don’t leave their areas. He wants the poor to stay poor and the rich to stay rich. Now what kind of priest does that? Priests are supposed to be generous and caring but this doctor is anything but. This illusion of the priest being helpful
Ever since the beginning of the twentieth century America has fascinated people from all over the world to move and to begin a new life. For many people living in America was a chance for a better opportunity and experiencing new things. They all had something in common and that is a dream. In the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, Lenny and George spent their lives migrating from one farm to another in order to obtain a stable life. They have no family and have an unsuccessful past; they try to see and reach their opportunities for a better life out there and believe that it can be done over hard work. Unfortunately, George and Lenny don’t accomplish their version of the dream; but with this journey the audience learns that a better life
Lennie symbolizes ignorance. More specifically, he is the American dream. Lennie is an inadequate thinker, and more importantly, has little common sense. In this section of the book, Lennie killed a pup by playing with it too harsh, his ignorance and stupidity doesn't help: “Why do you got to get killed? You ain't so little as mice. I didn't bounce you hard” (Steinback 85). This justifies Lennie’s ignorance. Lennie's mind troubles to process little everyday issues, therefore, he has to have George to help him survive in a society of snobs. He’s incapable of doing things on his own, George is his mind and tells him everything of what to say and do. Lennie went back and looked at Curley’s dead wife. The puppy lying close to her. Lennie picked
In all of these instances illusion plays a key role in a way for the characters to do away with the lives they do not want to be living.
A hero, as described by dictionary.com is 1. A man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities 2. A person who, in the opinion of others has heroic qualities or has performed a heroic act and is regarded as a model or ideal. In the essay Paradox and Dream, John Steinbeck states that the American Dream is intertwined with violence. He references children playing games of cowboys and Indians as well as organized youth gangs that have codes of behavior and hold responsibility for one another. Interestingly enough in a game of cowboys and Indians, just as in a war between youth gangs, there are rules as to who plays which part, even uniforms to represent these roles- much like the tales of super heroes and gangsters that fascinate us so much today.
Reality is the state of the world of how it really is, whereas an illusion is erroneous interpretation of reality. Illusions often derail people from their sanity, as they cause them to inadvertently live lives in accordance to false beliefs. As a result, the outcomes for these people, and the people around them, are often atrocious. The theme of illusion versus reality is excessively demonstrated in Macbeth, a play written by William Shakespeare, and also in The Crucible, a play written by Arthur Miller. In both plays, the characters that lived illusive lives ultimately ended up leaving behind a trail of ignominy, grief, and death. In Macbeth, it is Macbeth and Lady Macbeth who consistently misinterpret reality as a world that
John Ernst Steinbeck has written many award winning novels, some of which has even been produced as plays that captured audiences everywhere. Steinbeck wrote about real life experiences using realism, characterization, and dreams to emphasize his points and make an impact on his readers in order to reform or change society. The realism used in Steinbeck's works is not only effective in informing the reader of circumstances that should be changed, but this nineteenth century literary style also creates great feelings of empathy toward the characters and their dreams. Steinbeck used realism to convey his points for a purpose, and his main purpose was that he wanted something to be made known to the public. Of Mice and Men and The Grapes of
Through the intricate foundation of America, one can argue it’s inability to reach satisfaction. Among the nation itself, there always seems to be a sense of hunger into wanting more and more than one can bear to have. It’s a way of life that citizens of America are used to approaching. They reasoned that not being completely satisfy is the key into building our lives around morals, standards, and expectations for the future generations. From a complex writer himself, John Steinbeck, approaches this unrealistic to perfectionistic idea that America finds itself having in his critical essay, “Paradox and Dream”.
The book the pearl was full with a variety of action and surprising events. The author Steinbeck's moral argument of money doesn't buy happiness is demonstrated in every event occurring in the book. Kino and Juana made the right decision to throw the pearl away because it was an object that brought harm. This novella could have had a variety of different endings.
He adds onto these stanzas by stating that he is not the first priest to preach with an ulterior motive. With the idea that punishment could be lessened for money creates skepticism within the church, because it directly contradicts Christ’s teachings (Rossignol). With this intent for profit there have been many cynics who have questioned priests, tales, and the bible for many centuries. This is a common occurrence throughout history. Whenever there is an ulterior motive to make a profit, there is always corruption standing behind it. He continues saying that he is only in the business to make money.
Social realism, according to Kevin Attell’s An Overview of Mice and Men, is the main motive why Steinbeck wrote Of Mice and Men. Most readers would approve of this claim because the evidence Attell conveys to the reader justifies the author’s purpose of creating literary work. Furthermore, Attell brings in themes and concerns that strongly connect to social realism which also ties in with the author’s personal background.
This theme is established very quickly, In fact, the first paragraph of the play describes the illusions to take place, "But I am the opposite of a stage musician. He gives you illusion that has the appearance of truth. I give you truth in the pleasant disguise of illusion" (1866). During Tom's monologue, he discusses the premise of the play; when it takes place, who the characters are, and how the play is to be perceived (as a memory). His reference to illusion is not used
The line separating reality and the illusion of reality is a blur. The line separating the narrator’s self-aware expression and his story telling is a blur. The line separating Ambrose and the narrator is a blur. All of this may blur understanding. It is clear, however, that these blurs exist because of the “funhouse”. A funhouse, Lost in the funhouse, in which exist other funhouses. Various funhouses exist in the story and in the writing. For this reason, the title Lost in the funhouse is very significant.
Rather than wanting to do so as an act of kindness, the priest is motivated by Kino’s newfound treasure. He visits Kino and as he discusses the pearl, Kino begins to believe that wealth can fulfill all of his needs. Thus, he grows more attached to the pearl, and holds on to his desires more strongly. When attempting to sell his pearl, Kino’s wishes cause him to reject the low offers of the pearl buyers:
All perceived ideals are illusions. The only reason some perceive the same ideal is because they are Sheep blindly following each other. Only the awareness of the Divine can break the bonds of illusion. Your world of reality is a delusion as much as the world of unreality. When the stars are down and the ground is up, what difference can there be, except in our choosing? We are not separate from the Self, but neither are we this “I.”
“Krishna was pushing at the door. Then he gave up and went to a smaller doorway next to it. ‘I’ll get in, or else!’ He stepped up, pushed, and fell right through. Krishna lay on the beautiful floor. ‘Well, come in. There is no door here, just empty air’” (Buck, 88). In this quote, the illusions of the palace are meant to further beautify the palace, and is a defense against enemies who would try to barge in. It is also a way to test a man’s pride, the answer being his reaction when he falls for the illusions. Another example of illusion is in the story of the Golden Mongoose, where, the family is sent to heaven when they see past the illusion, and give Yama the last of their food. In Nala and Damayanti’s story, Nala uses illusions to hide himself, from the world, from Nala, and from himself. Throughout the Mahabharata, there is a strong emphasis on the illusions that cloud our eyes from reality, and how one must look past them to find resolution. They are often a test made to test one’s values and beliefs. However, illusions are also a form of self-defense—used to hide from others, from people important to you, or from even yourself. This is seen just as often in the book, in the story of the Golden Mongoose and Nala and Damayanti; and is also reflected elsewhere in the story when Yudhishthira is tested before being able to go to heaven, and when the Pandavas disguise themselves in the thirteenth year.