I find it very unique how Dr. Joseph Bell could detect patients with facts without asking questions. Going off of what Conan Doyle was noting during his clerked experience with Dr. Bell. If want to observe others we must first know and find out who we are as a person. One should want to know how their character appears to others, but in order for a person to do that they must observe thierselves first. Taking the assessment can prove if a person is either a innie (meaning if they are internally oriented) or outtie (meaning externally oriented) based on the twenty questions given. It goes off of three numbers that you answer to the question. 0 meaning if it not true to you, 1 meaning if it is sometimes or sort of true, and 2 meaning that its defintely true. Question number one states if I am: alert to the enviornment around me. My answer is two because I am most defintely alert to the enviornment around me. Question two: I am aware of my preferences for furnishing a room. My answer is two because I know what my preferences are for furnishing a room. Question three: I am good at following directions to specific places. I would say that I would be a one on that simply because if a person would tell me direction to a specific place I could follow there route, but if I know a faster route I will take it. Question four: I am generally not curious about the contents of a sealed envelope. That is not true of me because I would like to know what is in this sealed envelope especially
In the learning environment it is important to ensure that assessment arrangements can be adapted for a wide audience. People entering assessment all have individual needs. Someone these needs can be affected by physical or mental disability or other aspects of their personal make up. These factors can affect a person’s ability and capacity to interact with assessments so care should be taken to ensure that these factors are taken into account when they are assessed. Assessments should not just be made available in one form. This will limit many candidates’ abilities to achieve success at their assessment. I will now review different factors
Describe your overall reaction to your assessment. Did you find it accurate and informative? What other typology, if any, do you believe might also describe you? Were you surprised by anything that it said about you? Why?
After reviewing the meaning of each letter to the left, review the various statements on how these traits may apply to you. Your response should be a minimum of two to three sentences and include examples of what a person is like who has these traits that are represented by these letters.
What information do you think the assessment team might have asked Mr. Morse to collect about Marvin’s classroom performance?
The first indicator from the test involves question #3, being annoyed and unusually irritated. I have noticed with my increased school load, work and family demands, and health struggles, I have increased moments of annoyance and irritation; continual exposure to stress may have biological ties. An article in Psychology Today asserts, “ Our stress hormones surge into action and we enter the same fight-or-flight mentality our ancestors did when they were on bear-watch duty at the clan’s cave entrance. The slightest movement or noise can make us jump and react as if we are under attack, with nary a threat in sight,” (“7 Quick Ways to Stop Being So Irritable,” 2015). From now on, I will be more proactive in preventing my closest relationships from suffering the effects of an over-active fight or flight
I have two basic expectations from this exercise regarding the reactions of others. From those I have missed informing about the exercise, I expect complete surprise and even a bit of consternation. They may believe that I have developed some sort of mental condition. Those I have informed will not be surprised, but I do expect them to react at least with some hostility to my new "personality."
d). Draw on previous assessments - These can be useful if the person has already had
The claimant was alert and clear. He was orientated to person, place, time, and situation. His remote memory was poor. He was only able to remember one of the three words presented to him earlier in the evaluation. His immediate recall skills were above average for a forward recall task (8) and below average for a backward recall task (4). He was able to add, subtract, and multiply correctly. His word associations were poor. His abstract knowledge was fair. He somewhat interpreted two of the three proverbs presented. His social knowledge was good. His social reasoning was good. He was able to correctly identify the current president and his immediate predecessor. His concentration and persistence on task was average. His pace of task was fair.
4. What did you learn about yourself from the Assessment? (What were your major strengths and weaknesses? How do you react to these results? How can you build on strengths and minimize or eliminate weaknesses?)
Digging further into the process chapter four discusses as mentioned prior a testing for my actual reactions to several situations. Ultimately, how to spot and unsafe situations, what would you normally do, and what do I need to work on. Knowing your own strengths is a huge role in seeing the warning signs of an unsafe conversation in any application. My personal tendencies after taking the quiz are high in both silence and violence but,
If the response to a test defines you in a certain way, think very carefully about how you answered the questions because the answers you provide to the questions reveal what you actually [think you] would do, which
|Self-Assessments |You decide to have them take a series of self-assessments to aid you in your evaluation. | | |
Self-assessments are a journey of understanding and discovery, there are no right or wrong answers when it comes to the results of
2.How do I perform? Am I a reader or a listener? How do I learn?
As part of the ability tests, which measure what we have learned and our ability to learn new things, Projective tests are used to deduce a person's feelings, needs and motive on the basis of a person's interpretation of ambiguous stimuli, which consists of pictures, patterns and stories. The commonly used projective tests are the "Roschach Inkblot Test" in which the test taker must describe what he or she thinks the image is. Another test is the "Thematic Apperception Test" In which the test taker must make up stories interpreting a series of 20 ambiguous scenes.