How Employee Engagement Can Be Highly Affected By Leadership Communication

Employee engagement is today’s leadership priority. However, the catchphrase goes a long way back in the beginning of the 21st century. It has gained interest to this date, which can be credited to Gallup’s first version of the Q12 in the 1990s commonly termed as the Gallup Workplace Audit (Gallup Consulting, 2006). Subsequently, Gallup has continuously refined and expanded their Q12 for current business challenges. Furthermore, several literatures, surveys and evidence-based studies abound that exhibited positive results with employee engagement such as increased performance, safety, retention and profits among others.

In the recent years, employee engagement has increased in importance because the more engaged the employee, the less likely they are to leave an organization (Adkins, 2010). An engaged workforce equates to a company being more profitable and performing better on business outcomes (Adkins, 2010). The author will research how a leader’s communication style affects employee engagement within their organization. This research will help companies determine additional trainings or coaching that leaders can participate in so that employees are as engaged as possible.

To foster a better employee culture, we should employ programs to keep employees engaged in the company. Engagement is an organization’s best proxy for how far and how hard the employee is willing to work for the organization. Engagement, over satisfaction, is the best predictor of whether or not an employee will stay with an organization long-term. Engagement can be thought of as the employee’s commitment to the organization. If this is not enough to convince an organization, engagement is directly correlated with business performance in terms of employee retention, employee productivity, customer satisfaction, and financial performance. Therefore, even if it is a difficult concept to define, organizations should still invest heavily in maximizing it. While there are no conclusive studies that

Employee Engagement essentially depicts our connection to our work, our organization, our customers, our effects and to results. In any study involving employee engagement the three aspects which are studied are: i.Employees as unique entities in terms of their skills, abilities, attitudes and aspirations., ii.Employee in their role to create conditions of engagement and iii.Relationship, trust and communication between employees across levels. The challenge is not only to attract the best talent but also to engage the employees like, raising opportunities for carrier development, life style decisions, job changing and unbalanced work life which influence an individual’s decision to continue or quite.

In this essay, I am going to discuss how practices of leadership contribute to managing communication in the post bureaucratic era. This essay shall discuss the effectiveness of leadership approaches in the post bureaucratic era in managing communication in organizations. In section 1, I shall discuss leadership in terms of communication by drawing upon the article by Barry B. (2007). In addition, I shall also discuss the use of communication in running an organization in a leader’s desired way (Jack, G., 2004) and the need of contingency approach (Browning, 2007, pg 190) while communicating with employees. In section 2, I shall discuss how management stimulate loyalty in employees through embedding organizational identity (Gagne, J.F.,

One of the primary factors in employee engagement is a person’s relationship with his or her direct manager. Some managers are excellent at managing teams and making each person feel valued, while others don’t have the same abilities. Train your managers in the skills that can improve employee engagement, and it can boost your organization’s overall results. Most employees fear their supervisors, so they choose to leave because they don’t want to work in a stressful environment. However, they don’t always express their

It is vital to maintain a healthy line of communication between the employer and the employee and let the latter know about the goals of the organization and how they fit into it. In an interview conducted by Baldoni (2013), the chief scientist of Gallup Research Jim Harter Ph.D. states that employee engagement is maximized, “When employees clearly know their role, have what they need to fulfill their role, and can see the connection between their role and the overall organizational

An organization’s capacity to manage employee engagement is closely related to its ability to achieve high performance levels and superior business results. Some of the advantages of Engaged employees are • • • • Engaged employees will stay with the company, be an advocate of the company and its products and services, and contribute to bottom line business success. They will normally perform better and are more motivated. There is a significant link between employee engagement and profitability. They form an emotional connection with the company. This impacts their attitude towards the company’s clients, and thereby improves customer satisfaction and service levels • • • • • • It builds passion, commitment and alignment with the organization’s strategies and goals Increases employees’ trust in the organization Creates a sense of loyalty in a competitive environment Provides a high-energy working environment Boosts business growth Makes the employees effective brand ambassadors for the company

Let’s now explore what drives employee engagement. According to Towers- Perrin (2003), there are certain workplace attitudes that are critical when building a high-

Within any organization the elements of leadership, motivation, and workforce commitment are inextricably meshed with the effectiveness of communication. Organizations develop their respective cultures through communication among leadership and with all employees, regarding their mission, values, and goals (Robbins & Judge, 2007). Formal and informal leaders within organizations use communication to motivate others, and to create loyal and trustworthy employees. Such an organization is Southwest Airlines, whose company culture has been characterized over the years by unique leadership and communications styles (Schnoberger, 1992).

The author attempts to explain why leaders must learn to communicate effectively when attempting to gain compliance with goals and visions. The writer highlighted important factors to gain employee participation.

Culture and employee engagement has been one of the most debatable topics in the current years around the business world. Organization culture, which can be defined as “the way that the values and actions of managers and employees create a unique business environment,” plays a significant role in shaping the path of the company (Dizik, 2016). It is a key affecting almost every aspect of the business including employee engagement. The values, goals, and norms that the corporate culture exhibit can be reflected on the level of employee involvement and enthusiasm for work either positively or adversely. Organizations tend to address its culture and employee engagement strategically and financially. Even though these two areas promise to impose positive results on the business if addressed effectively, some companies may fail to do so.

For business, retaining clients are the main ambition because the profits of the business will continue to grow through the loyalty of customers. Communication skills are one of the essential parts of leading people to work successfully in the relationships with co-workers as well as clients in their commercial enterprises. Therefore, interacting with management, clients and team members in the workplace can help in order to enhance the interest of the business. Training staff to develop effective communication skills is indispensable for them to be stronger at interpersonal skills. To become greater in the world of business is mainly by this primary method. Hynes (2012) says “One way to encourage employee engagement is to provide

In today 's corporate world, where reliability to organizations is fading fast, engagement has been growing by companies to maintain employees. Employee engagement is “a level of commitment and involvement of employees towards their organization and its value,” (Maslach, 2008). An engaged employee works with his/her colleagues to progress their productivity within their job, for the ultimate benefit of the organization. Effective managers have the talent to get things done by other employees. This is done by motivating employees to accomplish tasks. A manager must be able to represent these tasks to employees. Motivated employees will work with the manager to accomplish company objectives. Those employees who are displeased will work against company objectives. In this study it examines to see what enhances employee engagement or what can create the employee to be disengaged. Employee engagement drives employees ' motivation, job satisfaction, and loyalty to their companies. A manager’s capability to build solid relationships with employees generates engaging employees which then they can accomplish at the highest level and be a successful employee, (Judge, 2001). Employee motivation is seen as an important building block in the growth of effective businesses. A motivated employee symbolizes both a modest advantage and as a strategic asset in the corporate world, which is why the issue of building self-motivation in employees has sparkled interest in managers. Not

The disconnect, between the top level organization and employees, has resulted in a significantly reduced level of engagement among employees. “Gallup research shows that 13% of