How Expropriation of Farmland Happened in Tipet's Amdo Province?

the land they claim, it simply gives them the right to a say in the

The proprietary right is protected by overriding interest under Section 70(1)(f) of Land Registration Act 1925 (LRA1925). Limitation Act 1980 stated requirement towards the squatter where he is in factual possession to the land for a period of 12 years continuously and is not objected by the land owner, he will obtain a title towards the land. However, Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002) brings changes towards this proprietary right where it provides a new set of rules which

With the uprisings become stronger, and tensions building greater it led to a massive reform across the state. The reforms began first in 1948 with the arming of the peasants in China to fight against Japan, with the peasants armed it had prompted rebellion against the landlords taking the power from them and taking back what was originally theirs. (DOC 6). With the picture of the peasant sticking their tongue out to the landlord shows how the power has shifted quite massively. The fact that struggle meetings where organized in the land reform process quite well shows that the peasants have the power now.(DOC 9). In the same year of 1950, along with change of power there was also a change

“In 1949 35,00 Chinese troops invaded Tibet.”This was put into detail in an article by Hisyam Takiudin.The Chinese raped,tortured,and murdered one fifth of the Tibetan population,most in work camps and during arbitrary.As a result,47 million people in all have died during these tragic times. The brutality was so bad that the parents with children were forced to bury their children alive when they disobeyed.These crimes have lasted 49 years! Evidently,these crimes are still being committed! In Tibet today there is still no freedom of speech,religion, and arbitrary detainment still continues. As Tibetans are being slaughtered,we’re sitting here doing

Source B is a primary source based on the observations of a Communist correspondent that objectively reported on the success of Mao’s land reform. From the source, we can infer that Mao’s land reform was not well-accepted among the people as they feared the plausible punishments of having successful crop production. . Source B states that “peasants look with a suspicious eye” and they “have no desire to become well-to-do through production efforts”. These descriptions of the peasants’ behaviour and attitude towards Mao’s land reform illustrates how the peasants were wary and distrustful of the government’s motives.

Archeologist and historians criticize the building of the Three Gorges Dam because it is socially and environmentally destructive. This is because when the dam is finished, nearly 2 million people will have been displaced and 4000 villages, 140 towns, and 13 cities will have been swallowed up. Also, monuments, and priceless archeological discoveries of this countries culture will be lost

dam breaks and everyone is not prepared, there will be some problems associated with the

Since Chinh is a member of the peasantry class, the unequal distribution of wealth among the classes leads him to believe that the peasantry class is a strong and hardworking class who deserves more than what they have. He acts as if it is an honor to be a member of this class. He states,” The Do family [their family] never owned rice paddy, not even the tiniest patch. That is why today, I have been promoted to chief of the village Land Reform Section “ (Huong 31). The Land Reform Section is an organization of the peasantry class that strives to eliminate the wealthy class (the landowning class). Their goal is to denounce those who own land in front of the entire community so that the landowners can witness the feeling of shame and embarrassment. He states “They [the landowning class] belong to the exploiting class. These are precisely the people we must denounce and punish” (Huong 22).

You may not know it but you also own a portion of the common land in Windrush. There are five small parcels of land that total 5.674 acres of common property that that you own 1/39th of the land in total. Meaning, you own a portion of the whole but not a specific piece of the land. If you owned 1,000 shares of a Corporation that had 10,000 shares outstanding, you couldn’t go in and claim a tenth of the business. You own a tenth of the whole. Now don’t you feel richer for that? We all own that land and we are all responsible for caring for that land. Furthermore, we all get to use that land within the rules established by the Property Owner’s Association, (POA). There is a Corporation that owns the land of which we are all voting shareholders

It is no question that agricultural workers have one of the most mentally and physically demanding jobs in the world. This was especially true for farmers in 1932, because of an abundance of food in the market that could not be consumed or sold in a depressed world market. As the prices of crops grown by farmers hit all time lows the Agricultural Adjustment Act was established in hopes of restoring the purchasing power of farmers. By reducing surpluses in crops and other commodities, and giving farmers cash payments for controlling how much crops they would grow the Agricultural Adjustment Act proved to overall help increase the value of crops ultimately increasing the purchasing power of farmers and enhancing their quality of life.

The dam is exactly as it seems the dam stores minerals unused by the mining company. The minerals are considered to contain copper and other toxic material. If the dam were to break the effects would be catastrophic. Since 1889, there has been a large majority of dam failures in the United States. The most devastating dam failures happen to be the Kelly Barnes Dam, Teton Dam, Baldwin Hills Reservoir, West Virginia slurry dam, and the Johnstown Dam. Each of the failures made a murderous imprint in every newspaper and story. Unfortunately, people lost their lives to each of these events. What’s to say that the Pebble Mine Dam wouldn’t do the same? The Pebble Mine Corporation states that they have engineered a dam that is able to withstand size 7.8 earthquakes. However, studies show that the area has had earthquakes up to 7.9. Although the Pebble mine states that the fault along Alaska has been dormant for ten thousand years, flooding from heavy rains is also a high possibility and should not be disregarded from the final decision. To ensure that the dam is safe well into the future supervision would have to be set on the dam

Despite extensive criticism, proponents of the measure feel that it has improved life in China. The policy, implemented in 1979, “was created by the Chinese government to alleviate social, economic and environmental problems in China” (Cabrera). Supporters of the policy claim that is has been successful. One measurement of a country’s success is its financial growth and China has seen an improvement in that respect. “With that rapid GDP growth, has come better nutrition, rising levels of education, longer life expectancies, and higher living standards for the vast majority of Chinese people.” (Azubel 2). Unfortunately, that financial growth has had little impact on the isolated farms and villages.

had sold only the right to use the land, not the land itself. They did

They include the dying of various animals and seldom fish species. The landscape around the dam could be damaged to a great extend due to the rise of the Yangtze water level. Drainage outlet could occur and therefore some of the surrounding land-scape will be flooded.

The government's move to acquire fertile agriculture lands for industry has agitated the farmers who are dependent on the lands for livelihood. Ever since the notification regarding the acquisition was published by the state revenue department on December 4 2008, the farmers to be affected have been holding meetings in Haripura, Charal, Bol and Siyawada villages and have decided to launch an agitation against the acquisition of their lands. However Government declared that it was not taking for free and the price of the land at Rs 1,200 per square