How Far Was Concern over National Security the Real Reason for Liberal Reforms Passed Between 1906 and 1914?

The National Government were successful in some aspects of softening the blow in Britain. Faced with a steep decline in international trade the; partly due to America’s protectionist tariffs

‘The main reason for conservative dominance in the years 1951 to 1964 was labour disunity’ Assess the validity of this view. (June 2011)

The year was 1940; the world’s second great World War was in full swing, with Britain and Germany at the forefront. The fall of Britain’s closest ally, France, stunned the British Empire and threw it into disarray. Through the chaos, Winston Churchill emerged. Churchill would be an inspiring leader who was able to rally the entire nation in times of hardship. Through his leadership, the “British Bulldog” would face the Axis powers and come out victorious, as well as become a public hero for the British people. Yet, immediately after the war, Churchill did not return to the prime minister seat because of a shocking defeat in his re-election, despite his immense reputation he gained from the war. Though lauded by the British population for his prowess as a wartime leader, Churchill’s conservative politics were out of touch with a population ready for post-war relief and led to his defeat in the 1945 election.

This period of Labour rule is often marked down as a poor performance on behalf of the labour party, critically looked upon by many historians. There were many failings under the rule of this government however the circumstances they were placed in caused severe restraints in their options.

Over the last century health and social care has changed and developed immensely with the implementation of the NHS and becoming a welfare state. Prior to this health care was only available to a minority of people, those who could afford it. In 1815 the old poor law was passed, it stated that each parish must look after its own poor and those who could not work were provided enough money to help them survive. By 1830 the poor law cost around £7 million, which came from taxing the middle and upper class, causing a sense of resentment towards lower class, unemployed people. In 1834 the new poor law was passed, its aim was to reduce the cost of looking after the poor. Workhouses helped with this, they provided clothes, food and healthcare in return for manual labour. Despite

The 1930s were a difficult time for most Americans. Faced with colossal economic hardships—unprecedented in American history—many Americans turned inward to focus on the worsening situation at home. The United States became increasingly insensitive to the obliteration of fellow democracies at the hands of brutal fascist leaders like Hitler and Mussolini. The U.S. was determined to stay out of war at all costs—even if its allies were in trouble; Americans believed that they were immune from Europe’s problems as long as they refused to get involved. However, as the “free” countries fell, one by one, to the Nazi war machine, Americans began to realize the folly of their foolish optimism and clamored for increasing involvement in foreign

In this case, England seems to be at an economic advantage in relation to poverty compared to third world countries. This quote can be related to the economic base portion of Marxist theory where welfare is promoted and a high percentage of the population uses it. Much like America, England encourages a capitalistic economic base. They believe the people under welfare housing will soon prosper and become a key component in the working class in the future. By providing them with such resources such as shelter, food, and medical care just to name a few, they shall soon overcome this tough phase in their life and break free from the cycle of poverty. However this is not the case. Many people stay in these welfare housing units for generations and are not doing their part to help leave their state of poverty, rather their succumbing to the presumption that things are not going to get better for them and they should just enjoy the free ride. The people living in poverty in England are given the necessities of life such as food, shelter, and even entertainment. When you think of poverty however, these do not come to mind. Usually you would think of the economic state of the

Explain the reasons for U.S. neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s. How did ideas about neutrality change during the period from the end of World War I to the passage of the Lend-Lease Act? Be sure to include any events, terms, or people that may support your response. – The purposes behind the US neutrality in the 1920s and the 1930s was on account of the US had dependably been an Isolationist nation, which means they endeavored to avoid remote issues. In the late 1920s and mid-1930s, a few books and articles guaranteed that arms makers had driven the United States into World War I for benefit. In 1934, the Senate made a council headed by Senator George Nye to research these cases. Nye proclaimed, "when the Senate examination is finished, we might see that war and readiness for war doesn't involve national respect and national barrier, however a matter of benefit for the few." The Nye Committee's examination did not turn up any proof of a genuine scheme.

The Poor Law act 1601 was introduced and classified the poor into three groups, setting policies for each, the impotent poor, able bodied poor and persistent idler. It viewed poverty as the fault of the person, not their situation. Following industrialisation and a decrease in agricultural jobs, workers moved to factories working for low pay and in appalling conditions, but those needing employment outweighed the availability of such.

The book is far from a complete history and instead focuses on one specific sector of British history, the plight of the poor in early 20th century Manchester. Three main points seems to fight their way to the forefront, as they drive the direction and tone of the book. The first main point stressed is the elaborate and complex social stratification. Roberts says on the first page, "I grew up in what was perhaps an ideal

Whether or not there truly was a ‘post war consensus’ in British politics from 1951 to 1964 is a highly debatable topic of which historians can often appear to be in two minds about; on one hand, Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson infamously described the period as ‘Thirteen years wasted’, whereas historian Robert Blake (a supporter of the Conservatives’, regards it as a ‘Golden age of growth’. The likes of Kevin Jeffrey’s even argue that consensus had even started before the war. Overall, the central issue was the idea of a mixed economy.

Prior to the Poor Law Amendment Act there was the Elizabethan Poor Law 1601 which was more generous towards the poor. It was becoming impossible for the government to sustain this law due to the growing costs. Statistics show that in 1802 the expenditure on poor relief was costing the government £4,078,000, this figure continued to

The foreign policy failures of British governments in the years 1959 to 1964 were due to a lack of realism about Britain’s position in the post-war world

During World War II, Britain’s government was starting to involve in people`s lives. Due to Britain’s increasing population, the farmlands could not produce enough to feed the citizens. Being that, the government began organizing the rationing of foodstuffs, clothes, and fuel to assure their citizens of basic needs. In like manner, the government was providing for the welfare of the citizens of Britain too. The citizens of Britain were very welcoming of this intervention the government is making (BBC page 2). Granted that, the prices of restaurant meals were limited, and extra milk and meals were provided for expectant mothers and children. Britain’s government actions to support their citizens created a sense of sharing and cooperation amongst

The British Conservative Party in 1935's main concerns were peace and defense. They understood that the League of Nations would play a huge role in both supporting and strengthening their goals in these two subjects. The League of Nations was the center of British foreign policy and the first interest of the citizens of Britain. The recent problems between Italy and Abyssinia only heightened the need for the League of Nations. They did not want to repress back into their old system which resulted after the Great War. The needs of national defense and the fulfillment of international obligations were the measurements of the national armaments by the Covenant. The Commonwealth of the United Kingdom and the British Empire played influential parts