How Is Alexander The Great Effective

Alexander the Great primary reason for defeating Darius in battle is the fact that he knew that his small army could not defeat Darius enormous army. He had to spread Darius army wide therefore weakening him in numbers and was able to send his stronger elite soldiers to Darius weakest point which was in the middle. It is very apparent that Alexander had victory on his mind but his strategy seemed to be both effective and efficient. Although, Alexander the great and Darius were in battle, it seemed that Alexander used fewer soldiers but he was able to. Take working at the bank for instance, in most loan departments the bank would employ normally around thirty people.

Alexander the Great, born of King Philip of Macedonia, was one of the greatest conquerors of history. In my opinion, Alexander was a great leader and warrior. For example, in Document B, Alexander used strategy to win over a battle. The strategy he used was complicated, but well thought out; Alexander moved his troops in all different directions to keep Porus puzzled, and took his cavalry to various points along the river bank where he would create a war cry so that Porus would parallel the movements on the other sides of the river until he no longer responded. Now Porus elephants were boxed in, and the elephants trampled their own men because they had no driver's upon them. In this way Alexander won a battle, and through his cleverness, he

Alexander the Great was one of the smartest leaders, which he showed on many occasions. When the Macedonian empire was fighting against India and Porus, who was a prince, Alexander was fighting against a whole army, and against many elephants that Porus brought with him. Alexander realized that he couldn’t go straight through the army because of the elephants, so he decided to split up his troops to confuse Porus. Alexander would make noises so that Porus would have to keep moving his elephants, until Porus decided to stop moving with the noises and stayed where they were. Alexander then boxed the elephants in and crossed right when Porus wasn’t expecting it, and ended up winning the battle (Doc B).

One point of evidence that Alexander was great was he was a military strategist. For example, “When Alexander saw this, he moved his troops in all different directions so that porus would keep puzzled.¨(Doc. B) He used different strategy to keep his

In Document B, it shows how Alexander was relentless in his battles and when he wanted to defeat an enemy he showed no mercy. While he was very clever with his strategy and found ways to confuse his enemies,

Alexander had remarkable ability, and so was great in many different ways. On top of doing great things, Alexander was a great leader, and a political and military genius. His goal to conquer Persia was one that he would let nothing stand in the way of. As leader of his troops, he suffered their same wounds, being one of the last great leaders to personally take the risk of death in battle. Alexander listened to every man he had, and so became very close to his men. Some argue his ability in motivating and inspiring his men was in fact the greatest ever seen, half-defeating the opposition in nerves before a battle began. He was also remarkable with military tactics, employing strategies still used today. As the Encarta Encyclopedia put it: "Alexander was one of the greatest generals of all time, noted for his brilliance as a tactician and troop leader and for the rapidity with which he could traverse great expanses..." He succeeded politically as well, earning respect from many people. Alexander's charisma and adoption of Persian customs gave him strong loyalty needed in order to control his massive empire. However, the greatness in his work here is questionable: often he used brutal force, sometimes killing thousands of civilians, or selling them into slavery. But overall, Alexander must be seen as great man in terms of a leader and a military commander.

How Alexander The Great Was Great Leaders are great because of their characteristics. Alexander III was king of Macedonia in the 300s BCE. Alexander showed his most important characteristics through his long route with success which came with the legacy he built, and fairness through sparing lives and being just. Alexander III, is great, because of his intelligence, leadership, and his fairness. Alexander is great because he had stunning intelligence.

In the decade that Alexander the Great was alive he had heavily impacted the world, and if what Alexander the Great did was bad or good all depends on what point of view you are coming from. Alexander the Great or Alexander ||| was born 356 B.C. Alexander the Great spent 13 years with a goal of conquering all of the known world back then. When Alexander the Great was 19 years old his father was murdered, and Alexander the Great said: “that he was going to take his father’s place and would do anything to accomplish it.” He then quickly gathered an army. After Alexander the Great and his army and him went to go and kill anyone that was in an attempt of taking his father's throne. After they finished that his army had made Alexander the Great

Alexander the Great was a very successful commander, and was especially successful against Darius of Persia. There are many reason we see in this battle of Gaugamela that causes Alexander to be victorious, but the main reason is the communication level between the army. Alexander does a phenomenal job of communicating the game plan with his army. The army was broken up into highly trained and well-disciplined units. These smaller units made it easier to communicate with, and allowed everyone to know what was going on at all times. Alexander would communicate and instruct his commanders of these units, and then they would train and communicate to the men. This great leadership and communication is what made Alexander great

One battle that shows his amazing strategies is the battle of Gaugamela. It was Darius the Persian king with about 250,000 men against Alexander the Great with about 45,000. Darius had his men in a line that stretched about 2.5 miles long. First the Phalanx on the left side moved away from the center and turned out from battle expecting a side attack. Alexander knew that this would confuse the enemy and get the enemies cavalry to charge into the open space.

Throughout history, there have been many prestigious leaders of armies and people, but none who were superior to Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great was a young leader who had strong abilities to lead a great army. Throughout this paper I am going to argue that Alexander the Great was the greatest leader of all time. To prove my point, I will go into detail in: how he was brought up to be a leader, his impressive military tactics, the Macedonian Conquest he led, and the everlasting legacy he left that still has effect on people today. Alexander the Great, also known as Alexander the III, was the son of Phillip the II of Macedon.

There can always be various ways of thinking when trying to achieve a desired state. When thinking this way it is a method called Equifinality. This method was used in the battle between Alexander the Great and Darius of Persia. Alexander was both efficient and effective. He was efficient because he managed to lead an army with less men and had a greater result than an army that was five times smaller. The efficiency also comes in with Alexander’s rows of troops that formed in a wedge while using 18-foot long spears. Darius’ troops used much shorter swords while forming in a conventional lines (Nassar, 2007) He was effective because of the result of his efficiency. Alexander used his resources to accomplish his desired outcome.

One of the greatest and most successful generals in all of history was Alexander the Great. He was a brilliant, patient and often devious man that never struck without careful planning. Alexander made decisions with great speed and took extraordinary risks, his success was achieved by his show of sheer force and will to overcome. During his lifetime, he defeated the Persians and Greeks, conquered Egypt and Asia Minor, and secured the Mediterranean Sea.

Through many history books and writings, many historians write about Phillip III, or most commonly known as Alexander the Great. Maybe because of how successful he was or maybe just because of how he had such a major impact in history. They tend to focus on the advantages he created, and the success Alexander the Great had as a leader not just in the military aspect of his reign, but also as a leader in the political side. The history shows the impacts and changes brought from the military, from which Alexander the Great lead, and the spreading of Greek culture he influenced through the areas he conquered. As Alexander the Great dedicated his life to further advancing his power, the world would never be same at the time for surrounding villages and empires that tried to defend their land against Alexander the Great with his army and allies.

Alexander the Great was a man who studied in his early life, battled in wars and became ruler at a young age. A lot of people looked up to him in many ways. Hey was a warrior and defeated several different groups of people. His way of becoming king was rather harsh. All of these little things led him to being great.