How Is Diction Used In Brave New World

emotional, connotative diction that he knows will have a significant effect on his readers. “Yet,

In the novel, Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, Huxley includes allusion, ethos, and pathos to mock the wrongdoings of the people which causes physical and mental destruction in the society as a whole. The things that happened in the 1930’s plays a big contribution to the things that go on in the novel. The real world can never be looked at as a perfect place because that isn't possible. In this novel, Huxley informs us on how real life situations look in his eyes in a nonfictional world filled with immoral humans with infantile minds and a sexual based religion.

of the themes in the novel easier to see and decipher. Using the archetypes that he did

In Brave New World Aldous Huxley, creates a dystopian society which is scientifically advance in order to make life orderly, easy, and free of trouble. This society is controlled by a World State who is not question. In this world life is manufactured and everyone is created with a purpose, never having the choice of free will. Huxley use of irony and tone bewilders readers by creating a world with puritanical social norms, which lacks love, privacy and were a false sense of happiness is instituted, making life meaningless and controlled.

Huxley uses society ideals from the future. One thing he uses to show Distortion is a drug called soma. In society drugs is like a trend it’s used daily and considered to help people feel better. for

Aldous Huxley, a philosopher and author, writes “Brave New World” which tells a story in a dystopian future world where technology

because through his first person narrative, the reader is drawn to his sensitive nature, his

In “The Brave New World” there is a board ridden with many new technologies and futuristic improvements that occurred in 1932 that could have only been fantasized and dreamed about. For Aldous Huxley to make these assumptions is quite hysterical and unbelievable because it is very close to how we currently live in modern day america. An abundant amount of the ideas Huxley presented aren’t anything close to how we may have things working currently, but they are very similar to the technologies we have invented. Huxley presented many wise and intellectual ideas such as mass production of infants, also that technology would become and take over and control almost all parts of society, and lastly how drugs would be greatly influenced to use. Know

Huxley illustrates perfectly how with the advancement of technology; society is incapable of seeing what

In order to properly read and understand Brave New World one must realize that Huxley was constructing a less serious ideal for perfection rather than trying to make

The novel, A Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, in my opinion is not the most important piece of dystopian literature from the twentieth century. While my belief that this novel is unworthy of being known as one of the top five dystopian novels of the 20th century is partially based on the fact that I very much so disagree with his writing style and opinions, it is also based on facts found in his writing. Huxley's writing style is incoherent and waits to properly explain items or events, while his characters are immature and negative. The twentieth century also spawned various dystopian based novels such as fahrenheit 451, 1984, and the giver which I believe are far better than A Brave New World. The following paragraphs will expand on the

“…if ever by some unlucky chance, anything unpleasant should somehow happen, why, there’s always some to give you a holiday from the facts. And there’s always soma to calm your anger, to reconcile you to your enemies, to make you patient and long-suffering. In the past you could only accomplish these things by making a great effort and after years of hard moral training. Now, you swallow two or three half-gramme tablets, and there you are. Anybody can be virtuous now. You can carry at least half you morality about in a bottle.” (pg. 217)

o read Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World is to understand the fear for the future during the 1930’s. Widely considered ahead of its time, Brave New World is one of the most influential novels regarding the destructive outcome of genetic and public manipulation through regime control. The story contrasts two worlds: the traditional world where the “savages” reside and the new World State: a negative utopia where unrestrained sexual freedom, reproductive technology, and mind numbing drugs run rampant.

The residents of the World State substitute the name of Henry Ford, an early twentieth-century entrepreneur and founder of the Ford Motor Company, wherever people in today’s world would say Lord. This demonstrates that even with casual conversation and habits, religion has been replaced by reverence for technology—specifically the efficient, mechanized factory production of goods that Henry Ford

Henry Ford’s revolutionary mass-production processes for manufacturing automobiles stands as an almost universal symbol for modern industrial capitalism. Both its hitherto unimagined material productivity and its similarly unprecedented impoverishment of the human spirit are simultaneously captured by the contradictory image of the automobile assembly line. Along such lines and in other mechanized processes pioneered by Ford, degraded and dehumanized workers toil to produce the very products that enrich their leisure lives. The incredible productivity of Fordist mass production makes possible, perhaps even necessary, mass consumption. Historians remind us that not only did Henry Ford innovate production methods that steadily lowered the price of a complex, mechanical consumer good, but he also pioneered the transformation of the toiling masses into consumers by raising his workers’ wages to an incredible five dollars a day. In liberal ideology, the sins of Fordist mass production against the human spirit are more than atoned for by this rise in material prosperity of the masses that is its corollary within industrial capitalism. (Gartman 1)