A person who is held reliable for someone else's wrongdoing is called a scapegoat. As in the movie, “The Dead Poets Society”, the character Mr. Keating is unjustly portrayed as a scapegoat. This unfortunate situation arises from the boys’ disruptive behavior and insubordination at Welton, as well as the tragic death of Neil. However, it is important to note that Mr. Keating is not to blame for any of these incidents. The truth behind his innocence becomes evident through the schools disapproval of his teaching methods, the boys’ discovery of the yearbook and their subsequent inquiry into the Dead Poets Society, and the heartfelt conversation between Neil and Mr. Keating regarding the play. To start with, Mr. Keating was a new teacher at Welton …show more content…
Keating had his divergent ways of teaching a class from the other teachers. Many of the staff were questionable about it. For example, Mr. Keaiting states, “Now we all have a great need for acceptance, but you must trust that your beliefs are unique, your own, even though others may think them odd or unpopular, even though the herd may go, “that’s baaaaad.” Robert Frost said, “Two roads diverged in the woods and I, I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference”(Weir). This quote is displayed by Mr. Keating and how he would take his lesson outside, and teach the students how to think for themselves. He was trying to get the point across to the students about how not to use conformity. With this, numerous staff members have seen his ingenious thinking; however, most detested this style of teaching. Another instance of this is Mr. Keating stating, “You must strive to find your own voice because the longer you wait to begin, the less likely you are going to find it all”(Weir). This quote describes how Mr. Keating was trying to show the student how to be an overall creative thinker. He does this by telling the students to rip out the front part of their textbooks, in hopes for them to break out of their normal school day, and find their own creative …show more content…
Keating supported Neil's desire to do what makes him happy, but always encouraged him to communicate his feelings with his father first. Neil, knowing his father would not understand, decided to go behind his back and participate in the school play anyway. When the day of play came Neil's father ended up coming to watch the play and his last words in the play was, “I went to the woods because I wanted to live deliberately, I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life, To put to rout all that was not life and not when I came to die Discover that I had not lived”(Thoreau). Despite Neil’s outstanding performance, his father was furious that he had gone against his wishes and got into trouble with him. It is important to note that Mr Keating had nothing to do with Neil's death and was simply trying to support him through a difficult time. In conclusion of all of this Mr.Keating should not have lost his job. Mr.Keating was an amazing teacher, who kids loved and looked up to him. By the end of the movie we see most of the kids standing up for Mr. Keating saying that the school was against him, and they did not want him to lose his
Through his teaching methods, Mr. Keating establishes in his students a sense of originality, creativity, and the ability to challenge themselves. The story also explores themes of societal expectations and the pressure to succeed, which can lead students into a spiral and question if what they are doing is really going to help them find what they want in their lives. In the face of these challenges, Mr. Keating teaches the students to listen to their own voices and follow their dreams, no matter how different they may seem. This struggle for self-discovery is portrayed through the character Neil Perry, whose passion for acting is suppressed by his father’s firm expectations. Neil’s fate emphasizes the film’s exploration of the consequences of denying one’s ‘true self’ in favor of conformity.
He demonstrates that he doesn’t just teach to live, he lives to teach, and he positively impacts every student he works with. A very important part of Aristotle’s philosophy is that “It is a mark of the proud man also to ask for nothing or scarcely anything, but to give help readily,” Mr. Keating’s execution of this earns him respect and admiration from his students and most of his peers. Howard Roark’s version of “[giving] help readily,” is to complete whatever sketch Peter Keating brings to him because Peter is spineless in his work. All Roark accomplishes with this is letting Peter know it’s acceptable to leach off Roark for the rest of his career and it ultimately crushes the spineless man in the end. Peter Keating exemplifies Aristotle’s version of the “man without perfect virtue” for he “imitate[s] the proud man without being like him… thinking themselves superior to others,” In another instance of Howard Roark’s version of “help” is in the second part
Mr. Keating, the outgoing, encouraging English teacher profoundly represents Thoreau's ideas of individuality by his words and actions, both in and outside of the classroom. Mr. Keating first shows an example of transcendentalism ideas during class, when he encourages his students to tear out the pages of the introduction. Mr. Keating believes the boys need to learn to analyze the poetry for themselves, and not listen to someone else's interpretation. He tells his students “Now in my class you will learn to think for yourselves again.” ( Dead Poets Society: Final Script). Mr. Keating wants his students to look beyond what a book says, and he wants the boys to interpret things they way they want to. Mr. Keating represents transcendentalist ideas again in the courtyard scene. He is emphasizing the dangers
Keating inspires his students. Mr. Keating’s first interaction with the students he walks into the room and asks them to follow him to the hall to see the photos of the past students who have graduated and since had died. While the student lean in Mr. Keating whispers “Carpe Diem.” Later, Mr. Keating instructs the student to read from the preface of the text book. He responds by calling it excrement and instructing the students to tear out the pages.
Mr. Keating cares about what the students think, and he displays that throughout the movie. First the students learned about conformity by walking in the courtyard, after walking together Mr. Keating told the students that conformity was the enemy. Mr. Keating got this from Emerson, a huge Transcendentalist writer, and his writing “Self-Reliance”. Self-Reliance states that “whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist”, and that is the point Mr. Keating tried to get across in the courtyard, that all men should think for their own and not think like every other man. Earlier in the film Keating had actually directly quote Walden, another famous Transcendentalist writer.
Before they had known Mr. Keating all the students would have just sat in their seats and do nothing, but because he had played a big role in their lives, this made them follow their beliefs and tell him to
In conclusion to this essay we talked about how Mr Keating was not guilty of the death of Neil Perry. Mr. Keating just wanted to inspire, and change the kids' way of thinking to help them pursue what they are happy with and want to
Mr. Keating was able to free the student’s mind by giving them a chance to think. In each class the students were to peruse everything from the content. Keating’s teaching method was not the “banking” method, it consisted of the “problem-posing.” Gaining knowledge from a book is not the same as gaining knowledge from another person. There is a scene where Mr. Keating takes the students to a corridor, he tells them, “Seize the day boys, make your lives
Some of the questions that come up when Keating's teaching methods are discussed are how would he do today? Would he be to unorthodox? Would students other teachers or parents like him? More than likely students would find him weird yet like his class. Parents would more than likely find him very weird but not to the point they'd get him fired. Also his colleagues
One student was inspired by professor Keating’s free-thinking ideology and ended up challenging his father's strict authority. This action contributed to the cause of his death when he committed suicide because of his father’s strict rules. His father wanted to suppress his son’s free-thinking and get him to comply with his harsh demands. It was unfortunate that he lost his life because of his father’s tight reign. I personally feel the student was taking strides in the right direction.
Welton is made to turn young boys into businessmen, doctors, lawyers and other good professions and it does not let them become actors, poets or creative people. Mr. Keating is an exception. By just mentioning the Dead Poet's Society that he once led, he showed his motivation for the boys to find their inner self and trust it. He wanted the boys to discover themselves
Another time when they were reckless was when Charlie Dalton pulled a prank on the school and published an article in the newspaper stating that women should be admitted into Welton and during the meeting claimed there was a phone call from God. Mr. Keating went up to Charlie and told him, “There is a difference between sucking the marrow out of life, and choking on the bone.” Mr. Keating reprimanded him because it was a stupid idea and that Charlie should not have done it. Neil Perry’s death was blamed on Mr. Keating because the school said it was Mr. Keating who abused his power to control his
The first comment Mr. Keating statement was the comment about “sucking the barrows out of life.” Mr. Keating’s activity the first day of class was described as he demonstrated the example of standing on the desk for students to see and strive to find their own voice looking down. He would treat the students with dignity and respect, building relationship, while challenging the process. Therefore, his leadership style was to coach and encourage students to believe in themselves. In addition, he encouraged students to acknowledge
Professor John Keating was a new teacher in the school who had unorthodox methods of teaching his class. Originally, he was supposed to teach a very serious class with no fun and games, the only focus is learning and that is it. Mr. Keating was also a rebellion of this strain theory. With his unorthodox methods of teaching his class, he stressed the idea of carpe diem. This concept affects all of his students and they were to “seize the day” by setting themselves free of the order their society had imposed on them. Mr. Keating was a big influencer in Neil’s decision to pursue acting. The pressures to succeed placed on Neil by his parents and society prevent him from exploring his own individuality. He felt as if he were enclosed in a box with nowhere to go. Neil’s father had warned him that if he did not stop acting he would have
“Carpe Diem. Seize the day, boys. Make your lives extraordinary.” were the words that changed my life. You probably remember me as the shy, quiet boy that first stood on the desk reciting “Oh captain, my captain.” I would like to address the issue of Mr. Keating’s dismissal. You are making a monstrous mistake. (Hyperbole) Mr. Keating does not deserve to be dismissed. He only encouraged nonconformity so we could be own our person, he encouraged us to deface materials so we could think for ourselves, he used strange methods to teach so we could understand his lessons better, and lastly he never caused problems with Neil’s parents, he was only there to help. All these peculiar teachings was just so we, the students can see and understand the world at a new perspective. (Appositive)