Essay about How Kristin Died: a Case Study on Public Administration

Sanger Rainsford, the highly-praised hunter who recently went missing, was put on trial yesterday for the supposed first-degree murder of General Yuri Zaroff. The defence proposed that the death of General Zaroff was an act of the accused defending himself. On the contrary, the prosecution claimed that their client’s death was planned before it occurred. When the verdict was announced, Rainsford’s guilt was still not decided. The conclusion was a hung-jury where the vote was seven in favour of guilty and five for innocent. The jury was then dismissed because the session had passed its time.

The event of the tragic murder in the favela Vigario Geral was a horrid and uneducated idea from the military police as revenge for the gunning down of four policemen. In this senseless murder of innocent civilians, 21 people were killed in their homes. Police entered random houses, and shot multiple people and families without reservation, sorrow, or evidence that these innocent people had anything to do with the drug trade within the favela.

The purpose of this report is to evaluate whether or not Alexander Lindsay Mcleod suffered a miscarriage of justice when convicted of attempted murder of his wife in 1964. This report will explore the role and responsibility of an investigator and the type of roles and responsibilities that are applicable to the case. It will also discuss the legal boundaries that an investigator has when at a crime scene and interviewing of suspects and witnesses applicable to the case.

The case of Kusmider v. State, 688 P.2d 957 (Alaska App. 1984), was a state appeal’s court case that addressed the chain of causation for a murder, which had occurred, and the actions of the trial court judge (Brody & Acker, 2010). In this case, the appellant, Kusmider, appealed his conviction for second degree murder, based on the fact that the trial judge did not let him introduce evidence, which may have shown that the victim may have survived his wounds, if not for the actions of the paramedics.

This case is of interest to both myself and society because Truscott was wrongly convicted based on the limited scientific knowledge available in 1959, and the police’s tunnel vision. They were so adamant on finding the killer that they became fixated on Truscott as the only suspect, and did’t bother widening their search. Because of this, evidence was tampered to frame Truscott. What happened to Truscott was a miscarriage of justice, which affects society’s confidence in the legal system, and it undermines the criminal justice system’s legitimacy.

Planning for a correctional agency has been a great opportunity for me to share my opinion over death penalty. I believe that challenges for correctional administration are usually influenced by the development of new correctional philosophies. Preventing death penalty is what I speculate on the next era of correctional philosophy that will develop from the current “get tough” approach. There are certain reason why I believe this changes would need to be made to implement this new philosophy. The death penalty is one of the most controversial issues worldwide. Most people are in favor or against it.

In chapters five “Chasing My Stolen Bicycle” and seven “Duke Lacrosse Players Relieved Case has ‘Closure’”, they share a similar theme. They both involve risk, harm, and seriousness. They both involve the role of a prosecutor, as well as deal with some type of crime.

Over the course of the next year the tensions and suspense from this case continued to grow. The police knew that civil unrest was going to occur no matter how the outcome of this case, but knew it stood to be worse had the defendants be found not guilty.

This case study will briefly explore the concepts of the contingency theory, and how it could have been applied to Chief Koby’s management style. The chief’s leadership and management style has greatly affected his organization as a whole. It is also noted that he was severely criticized for mishandling the controversial murder case of Jonbenet Ramsey, along with two other high profile incidents which will be discussed in this case study (Haberfeld, 2013).

This essay is purposed for the evaluation of the provocative case, The State of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson, more commonly referred to as O.J. Simpson. On the 12th of June, 1994 the homicide of Nicole Simpson, O.J. Simpson’s ex-wife, occurred at her home. Reports of a body sprawled out the front of Nicole Simpson’s house were made through a 911 call. On arrival, police made the discovery of Nicole Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman’s dead bodies outside the house. The review of this investigation will be achieved through; Assessment of the key aspects of the process of investigation. Evaluation of the main investigative flaws made throughout the investigation. Identifying strategies to prevent these flaws from happening in

Early the next morning of December 8th, the lifeless body of Debbie Carter was found strangled in her small apartment. The murder of Debbie Carter flipped this small, rural, bible-belt, town on its head. People were outraged, overwhelmed, and stunned that such a thing could happen in this town to a young, beautiful girl whom everyone had known. This gruesome act put enormous pressure on local law enforcement to find the atrocious criminal. Finger prints, hair, and blood spatter was carefully collected from the scene.

There are many organizational failures that led to the shooting death of Michael Brown and the riots in Ferguson, Missouri that followed. The main form of organizational deviance that was seen in the events that led up to the shooting of Michael Brown was administrative breakdown, which is “produced by the failure to implement or enforce administrative principles (e.g., unity of command, discipline)” (Giblin, 2014, pg. 584). The Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division wrote in their 2015 Investigation Report that “Ferguson law enforcement practices violent the law and undermine community trust, especially among African Americans” (pg. i). They found that there was a “pattern or practice of unlawful conduct…that violates the First, Foourth,

Our first reports of Cartier having run in’s with police agencies arises with one of his previous girlfriends, Rose. After buying rose a kitten, he was arrested for malicious destruction of that kitten. Furthermore, Rose had filed a restraining

The Criminal Justice Systems have various objectives to achieve, one of them being reduction of crime levels. Another core objective is practicing justice. These two objectives can be achieved in various ways. Evidence has been presented by the authors that the judicial systems sometimes play unfair in solving crime cases.

Capital punishment is beneficial to the community. It provides the society with a sense of security. The death penalty contains a positive influence on the future. A heavily debated topic is, “Does capital punishment deter people more than a life sentence to prison?” An explanation on why will be covered later. An issues many people have with capital punishment, is when it is just or not just. This is a topic many stray away from, because it is difficult to decide. Finding the right consequence for an action is difficult. While this paper is for the use of capital punishment, it is clearly not needed for every crime, or even every murder. Overusing capital punishment, such as using it for every murder, will negatively impact the country, and not using it has the same effect.