How Male And Female Students Use Language Differently Deborah Tannen

The methods in which men and women communicate are eminently different. This being so, their external state is an indicator of their inner state, but men and women have different external states to express themselves. This is especially evident among children and individuals in relationships, and altered between a couple who tries to adjust their behavior. Deborah Tannen, the author of “Sex, Lies, and Conversation,” argues that boys are girls are taught to have a differ inner state, that males and females usually have the same inner state but express them differently when communicating, and that individuals in romantic relationships can alter the way they present their outer state to represent their inner state in a way their partner can relate to.

In Tannen’s first section, status vs. support, Tannen states that women view talking as a way to receive support, whereas men are

In 1991, a linguist teacher by the name of Deborah Tannen published "Conversational Styles "in the Chronicle of Higher Education,a weekly newspaper for college professors ."Conversational Style"is the way we converse with one another.Tannen felt as if "small-group interaction should be a part of any class ",but rather than state facts to support her argument she relied on her expertise in public speaking& her own personal experiences to strengthen her point of view.Tannen felt that men accounted for an higher percentage than woman when participating in class discussion, because men are more comfortable speaking in a public setting than woman.Tannen stated"That men are more likely to be comfortable with the debate-like form"that commonly takes

Tannen says that another colleague that read her book, told her that he took “for granted the best way to deal with student 's comments is to challenge them”(Tannen para. 10) He noticed that the females in his class were quiet. He decided to begin class with an open discussion instead, he found more women began to speak up and women liked this better but men liked this less. The reason for this was men liked being challenged and most women thought of it as a public humiliation.

A CRITICAL SUMMARY OF DEBORAH TANNEN 'S "THE POWER OF TALK: WHO GETS HEARD AND WHY

Tannen effectively opens with an anecdote about how she was at a gathering for a women’s group and men were invited. She talks about how one guy was very talkative, offering ideas and telling stories, while his wife was sitting in silence. Towards the end of the evening Tannen commented that “women frequently complain that their husbands don’t talk to them”. The man quickly agreed with Tannen and admitted that his wife was the talker in their family and if it weren’t for

While she offers some thoughtful insight in regards to male and female conversational styles as related to the classroom, she seems to be too one sided. She focuses on how males in every situation dominate conversations more than females. Stating about a student in her class that, “this young man valued the experience of being attacked and challenged publicly. Many, if not most, women would shrink from such ‘challenge,’ experiencing it as public humiliation” Tannen generalizes this phenomenon to apply to all males and females without offering any tangible evidence. She makes several such assumptions and statements that are not supported by adequate proof, relying more on stereotypes than concrete facts. For instance, she assumes that the audience has experienced participating in a classroom discussion, while it is possible that some of the audience have not. Classroom debates are not practiced in every educational system. Moreover, most of her assumptions are based on the findings from her own class experience only whereas adding accounts from other classrooms would have aided in convincing the audience. This is because not all classrooms are identical. Differences are evident from classroom to classroom. When Tannen does include opinions from her contemporaries, they are not related to the main idea of gender-based conversational

Education has always been the most efficient tool for success in the 21st century. Due to it, people become professionals in various spheres, and it also provides means for prosperity. People acquire knowledge in order to lighten challenges they face in everyday life. Education plays a vital role in shaping an individual’s success in personal life. It assists people in earning recognition and respect in social relations with others. It also impacts the development of personal skills and the future career. However, teachers are also important contributors to a person’s brighter future. Their role has always been indispensable in the educational process of every student. The purpose of this essay is to analyze the purpose and problems of education in Deborah Tannen’s article How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently. Although, there are major inequalities in the overall standards of today’s education, students, themselves, create imbalance through their conversation styles in the classroom settings.

Another interesting statement I would like to bring to the surface is Alvarez writes in her book that “boys are born men but girls turn into women” (72). This made me think of the BBC YouTube clip we watched in class. Within this video a mother, father, and daughter are getting prepared for their daughters sweet fifteen. One of the first things I recognized in this film was that the father a male was speaking about and for the females when they were in the same room as them listening to what he had to say. This is a problem in itself as the male voices his and silences the women, in addition, he is speaking on a subject that he does not even fully understand, women. For arguments sake a women would never speak about a man and what it means to be one. This power dynamic within this family is troubling and shows the dominance of one gender over

Each individual conveys their ideas in unique ways. Men and women in particular express themselves in drastically different ways. In “How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently,” Deborah Tannen, a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University, experiments with the causes of classroom dynamics. Tannen opens her discussion by exploring the beginning stages of learning communication skills and then fast forwards to adulthood. Tannen uses research from sociologists and anthropologists such as Lever, Goodwin, and Eder as well as insight from Walter Ong to add credibility and to create a foundation for her explanation of the causes of classroom dynamics. Tannen expands on this research from cultural and behavioral professionals by creating an experiment in her own classroom to demonstrate that communication skills learned and cemented in younger years, combined with a “ritual opposition” setting, produce classroom dynamics.

Deborah Tannen is the author of Sex, Lies and Conversation: Why is it So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other. Deborah Tannen is a woman who researches the relationships between men and women. She has not only conducted research but also has information to support her view. In her essay Deborah Tannen argues complications happen in marriages/relationships due to individuals not being able to communicate with each other properly.

On the other hand, women are silent, but deadly. Women are more silent compared to men because they do not enjoy the spotlight; they prefer a small private like class to express themselves. They are as smart as men but certain ethics and social standards don’t let them reach that potential they would like to reach. Tannen mentions “women are more comfortable speaking in private to a small group of people they know well”(par 13. 371) Prinz also mentions “Accordingly, women were often educated in separate schools, and they were discouraged or prevented from pursuing graduate degrees”(par 5. 628). Meaning, women were use to being in groups that they were familiar with, not allowing to speak freely due to negative consequences. Women have been

In conclusion, my response to Tannen’s book so far is that she, without a doubt sparked a revolution in the general understanding of sociolinguistics. Her book addresses to both women and men; but in reality, the book targets male and female relationships and uses telling examples and observations to stunningly demonstrate how even in the closest of relationships women and men live in different worlds made of different words. Overall, Tannen has become a sort of guru to the masses by suggesting that the battle of the sexes is a mistake. A feminist, she nevertheless writes about emotionally laden issues dispassionately - and her balanced approach has won her fans of both

The theory that differences are fabricated early in a child’s life and are not biological doesn’t account for everything. David Cohen, in his article regarding Tannen’s findings points out a mystery in the connections she made. "Since women are primarily responsible for child-rearing and therefore disproportionately responsible for teaching the species to speak, when is it that boys learn to speak in the male style?"

In Deborah Tannen’s article “Who Does the Talking Here?” published in The Washington Post on July 15, 2007. Tannen writes about a new study published in the journal Science that has inspired critics around the stereotype that Women do more talking that Man (356). She asserts that those studies are not useful since they focus mainly on counting the number of words that college students use in their daily speech (356). She agrees with an article that surveys 70 studies about the differences in talkativeness in genres, since counting words does not lead to a real difference (357). Tannen declares that to determine who talk more, people must consider how and in what situation each gender uses words (357). She exemplifies the importance of