How Mrs. Jones Action Changes Rodger

Months later, Lucy is back in England living with her mother and brother. She is soon engaged to Cecil Vyse. He is a well-to-do man from London. When it comes to love, he does not think of it as a partnership, but rather a protector and a protected sort of relationship. Mrs. Honeychurch, Lucy’s mother, believes he is a great match for her daughter because he is well connected. She continuously makes this point, and does not ask if she truly loves the man her daughter plans to marry. Her idea of love is obsolete because love does not really ever matter to

I preferred the book version of this story, because it gives us a more in-depth story about Jones and the giver. The book tells us how Jones feels and it makes us feel what heś feeling. It also gives us more information about the giver telling us more about his daughter Rosemary and how he loves Jones. The giver book was a great story about a 12 year old boy living in a dystopian city where he thinks everything is perfect but as time goes by he learns that not everything is perfect and he needs to change it. But the best reason I like the giver book instead of the movie is because….I like to read.

I think she handled it that way because that would have probably been the way she would have wanted to be handled in that situation. I also think she handled it that way to teach Roger a lesson and let him know what’s right and wrong. Another reason she did it this way is because she said that she did some things worse than that for things that she couldn’t get. In the story Mrs. Jones is trying to accomplish a couple things. First she is trying to accomplish a lesson to Roger. The lesson she was trying to get across was to never steal a women’s purse. She was also trying to teach Roger to maybe ask before trying to take something since she gave him money and said he could have asked. The experience that Roger had in the story with Mrs. Jones

According to the story Mrs. Jones impact on Roger will most likely make him change a lot because in the story it states that he doesn’t have anyone at home to take care of him. But since Jones had the kindness in her heart to take him in and feed him then make him clean himself up she played a huge role when she did that because his parents aren’t around to make him do things like that. After that she had gave him the money to buy the shoes he wanted so now all these beautiful old ladies don’t have to worry about getting there purse snatch because Roger became a gentleman and now knows he have to ask for things instead of taking. Basically Mrs. Jones raised him to become a man in less than 3 hours in the story it stated that Mrs. Jones told

In this last chapter, my curiosity towards the Prince Jones character was put to rest. The elaboration to the character of course served a purpose, and you could draw new inferences from the Dr. Jones story. For example, it seems that no matter how hard someone tries to get out of the stereotype by attainting education, resources, and material possessions. They are still one racist incident away from being in the stereotype. We would all like to believe that we fit in with the people we grow up with and associate with. However, in Dr. Jones case she had to go above and beyond to receive the respect she has from her equals. This goes back to the fact that as a person of a certain color you will always have to work harder than your white counterparts

Sissy seemed to be the only one who knew that Louisa felt no form of love towards Mr. Bounderby. She felt extremely sympathetic for Louisa, mourning the loss of freedom that she never truly had. At this moment, Louisa could not bring herself to look at Sissy. She felt coldness and pride that prohibited her from having any real feelings. Sissy was able to experience life in completely different way that Louisa was not.

Mrs. Jones is like any woman-she wants to be loved. She felt like she needed to take care of her mother, though, and this could be achieved if she married George. Though he was not her ‘dream man’, he could offer her (and her mother) an arrangement that she would not be able to get otherwise. The fact that the woman married George H. Jones for her mother was very considerate. As the play progressed, the woman began to get more annoyed with her husband each time he spoke. During the scene before the bar scene, I had a slight instinct that some sort of infidelity would happen, and it did. I believe that once Mrs. Jones learned about the stones and the bottle from her young lover, she could not remove the idea from her brain. Though she claims she killed her husband so she could be ‘free’ from him, I am not sure how she had the audacity to murder him in cold blood. During the trial, I felt the young woman would never succumb to admitting she did the deed since she was so routine whenever she was asked if she murdered him. Finally, the straw that broke the camel’s back was when the letter from the young lover was read. To be perfectly honest, I was shocked that he recorded their affair. I also thought to myself, “How could he have done this to

Imagine, shopping in the middle of the day for new clothes, walking from store to store when all of the sudden a boy tries to steal your purse. As the boy tries to run away, he trips and falls. You grab your purse back, and the boy is right there. You do the only thing you can think of doing in the heat of the moment, you start yelling at him, trying to make him feel bad. As you are yelling at the boy, you realize his looks dirty, not taken care of, battered. All of the sudden it hits you, this boy is not a happy, fortunate boy, but a sad boy in an unfortunate situation. Now, you would probably feel bad, but the boy did do something wrong, so you can’t feel completely guilty, however you do realize he has a tough life. In the book, Mrs Jones has two options, to let the boy go, or to call the cops. She doesn’t call the cops, but instead she lets the boy come to her house, wash up, and eat with her. I think what she did was the right thing to do instead of calling the police because she helped the boy without ruining his life and it was the selfless thing to do.

Where she then washes his dirt marred face, and make him a warm dinner. Mrs. Jones remembers her own time, as a delinquent child and her crimes, and instead forgives the boy. This is rather uncommon in modern stories; fiction, or nonfiction. This sets it apart from many other pieces and

In the beginning of the story, Rodger tried to snatch Mrs. Jones purse. When he went to pull the strap it popped, and he fell. He was so afraid when Mrs. Jones grabbed him and dragged him. In the story it said that his face was dirty so she took him to her house so that he could wash his face. In the middle she asked him why he did it. After he got done washing his face he told her that it was because he wanted some new shoes. She then told him that he didn’t have to steal to get what he wanted. She also let him eat some food because he looked hungry. Then at the end of the story she gave him 10 dollars to get him the new shoes he wanted. I think he was shocked and amazed. Even though he tried to steal from her she steal gave him money for

Mrs.Jones rubbed off on him after she brought him to her house, because when she knew that she left the door open but she also knew that he wouldn’t run and she was right. Roger realized that what she did by not being mean or hitting or bringing him to jail that he owed her one so he didn't leave just because Mrs. Jones had some faith in a boy she didn't even know.

Junior approached him to ask if Rowdy would like to transfer with Reardon with him. Junior believes that Rowdy will be very sad or join him Rowdy however is deeply offended. He calls Junior a “white lover” he says “i hate you” “you suck” and then goes on to beat him up alot. This makes their relationship at a 14 year low. In Rowdy's mind Junior has betrayed him and left him.

First Mrs. Jones is non judgemental when she took in a street kid, that was a thief, and treated him like a normal human being. According to the short story, Mrs. Jones acts with acceptance when she said, “Then we’ll eat,’ the woman said. ‘I believe you're hungry-or been hungary- to try to snatch my pocketbook!” She eats with him even though he’s filthy and just tried to steal from her, if people in the real world would treat people with this acceptance, when their less fortunate, we could help so many people that can’t help themselves. Also Roger learns to respect others when he is treated nicely by Mrs. Jones. Because, when he first is in the house he does not run when he could which is proven when the author writes “The woman did not watch the boy to see if he was going to run now, nor did she watch her purse...” He could of easily ran out with her purse but he respects her kindness and doesn't want to be mistrusted now. Finally Mrs. Jones teaches Roger good morals and how to be a good person. For example, when Roger is leaving the house Mrs. Jones says, “And next time, do not make the mistake of latching onto my pocketbook nor nobody else's - because shoes got by the devilish ways will burn your feet.” Mrs. Jones helps show Roger to make good decisions; so that he would not end up in a jail cell later

First, the story features a likable protagonist in Jones. He’s clearly flawed and makes the wrong life choices, but he’s also easy to relate with and one forgives him for his decisions. There is rooting interest in Jones to be safe and happy.

I choose “the necklace” because this story has a lot to do with realizing material things don't have much of a meaning. In the necklace, the main character dreads the fact that she doesn't have as much as others. Or how much she would expect herself to have. Nevertheless, she comes to a realization after she loses a necklace that was lent to her, she works until she gets enough money to pay off this debt. To find out later that the necklace wasn’t real. This story reminds me of me of when I was younger and I was trying to fit in the with some would say the “Joneses”. The “Joneses” is an Idiom in the English speaking world, basically stating that comparing yourself to one neighbor as a benchmark for social class or the accumulation of material goods.