How People Should Not Choose 'Made in China'

The international trade sector of the U.S. economy continues to draw attention in economic and political circles. It is true that, the international market has become increasingly important as a source of demand for U.S. production and a source of supply for U.S. consumption. Indeed, it is substantially more important than is implied by the usual measures that relate the size of the international sector to the overall economy. This paper explores the role international trade now plays in the U.S. economy and answers the important questions for economic policy: How does international trade affect economic well-being? Who gains and who loses from free

It is this that has sparked China’s vulnerability to external shocks. In 2011, China’s exports amassed almost $2 trillion, however in Feb 2012, China recorded a $31.5 billion trade deficit as a result of the European sovereign debt crisis in which China’s main trading partners plunged into recession. China’s severe BOGS decrease is an attempt to control growth and a sustained level of 7.5%. Investment policies are also critical for China to achieve economic growth and development. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in China is being sought primarily in the redesign of State Owned Enterprises (SOE’s) and in the development of interior provinces. Between 75-80% of World Bank loans to China in 2008 were directed to the central and western regions, the most economically disadvantaged. This promotes increased wealth within China, leading to higher levels of development due to a more positive Human Development Index (HDI), which currently sits at 0.687, up from 0.677 in 2010. Thus, trade and investment are critical factors in ensuring that China’s growth remains sustained at 7.5% whilst still encouraging increases in development.

• The enormous surplus of labor in China imperils workers worldwide as international competition puts incessant downward pressure on wages and working conditions, leading the apparel and textile industries to favor the cheapest and most Draconian producers.

Jobs outsourced to China have subsided American employment opportunities and have helped contribute to wage erosion since 2001(Peralta). Between 2001 to 2013, 3.2 million American jobs were lost and three-quarters of those jobs were in manufacturing (Peralta). When you outsource jobs to different countries because it is cheaper, you are helping destroy your own country and could even be supporting slave and child labor and companies do this because they are greedy and want to make more money even though they could be getting low quality, brand damaging products

From January until October in 2010 imports from China to the United States this year were $299,026.0 million and only $72,276.2 million in exports to China, leaving a U.S. trade deficit of -226,749.8 million - this is according to the U.S Census Bureau U.S Foreign Trade Statistics. Here we can examine that Chinese

American’s now quite overwhelmingly agree that this is not the case. Another secondary argument is that the way the United States has dealt with the Chinese in terms of trade has presented many challenges to American employment. Where the United States once dominated manufacturing, China now leads the world by creating goods for extremely low costs, harnessing innovation in manufacturing technology and orchestrating the theft of intellectual properties. Bonvillian makes a point to mention that innovation in Chinese manufacturing is typically understated in discussions, as most are only concerned with the underpayment of the Chinese workforce. A counterpoint to the belief that a nation has to underpay its workers to succeed in manufacturing is the example of Germany. A large number of German citizens work in manufacturing for high wages, creating more expensive goods. The German’s run a trade surplus with China because of their trade strategies. Another great secondary claim is that the United

The U.S main trade allies are Canada, Mexico, China, Japan, Germany, South Korea, and France combing for a total of 180 billion dollars earned. But not only do we earn money by exporting, we spend money importing the U.S spent 388 billion dollars on imported oil. “We aren't addicted to oil, but our cars are”.James Woolsey..On other products such as forest products, cars, food, and footwear we spend about 124 billion dollars from china which is the most from a country. In 2013, the total U.S. trade deficit was $476.692 billion. This is because the imports of $2.76 trillion exceed its exports of $2.28 trillion (Amadeo, Kimberly). This also shows the economy is strengthening, because of the deficit is lower than in 2012, when it was $537.6 billion. Another big cause to the trade deficit is consumer products. The largest products are drugs, consumer electronics, clothing, household goods, and furniture. Vehicle and mechanical products are another category where the U.S. ran a trade deficit in 2013. They imported $294 billion worth of cars, trucks and auto parts, while only exporting $146 billion, causing a huge deficit of $148 billion (Amadeo,

With the elimination of U.S. government subsidies, cotton textile manufacturers will pay more for cotton. As the leading buyer of cotton, the Chinese apparel industry’s profitability will be reduced due to their inability to pass on increased cotton prices to their buyers. China’s manufacturing costs had already increased by as much as 40% due to higher market wages and costs with complying with worker and environmental protections. Although China has substantial labor and is accused of utilizing sweat shops to keep their costs extremely low, their increasing manufacturing costs have opened the door to other countries with cheap labor such as Vietnam and Pakistan.

I think it also works to undo the notions that China was stealing away all our jobs in the apparel arena, because despite the complex protectionist measures taken, America still lost lots of jobs in the textile industry. The author points out that this is because of technology, and that when it really comes down to it, China is losing their textile jobs at a rate faster than the U.S. did (142). She also goes over some of the unintended consequences of the measures such as increased material costs as a result of the increased import barrier (142). She also suggests in this section as an alternative to erecting trade barriers, to instead compensate workers of the losing industries, known as the compensation principle (151). Lastly, with the lift of the measures and quotas by 2005, there will be a new surge in Chinese goods to America, as illustrated in figure 9.1, page 167. China’s percent increase after release from the quotas will measure some 900%.

China is one of our biggest labor competitors. The reason many US companies go to China for outsourcing is again, because of their workforce’s willingness to operate at low costs. Michael Zimmerman describes this as a disparity in worker “tolerance”. Where the low wages found in China are “far lower than U.S.

The U.S. trade deficit has risen more or less steadily since 1992. In the second quarter of 2004, the trade deficit relative to GDP surpassed the 5 percent mark for the first time. Many economists already considered trade deficits above 4 percent of GDP dangerously high. The fear is that continued growth in this external imbalance of the U.S. economy will ultimately spook overseas investors. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2004/09/b193700.html

Labor is one of the largest and in certain sectors the most expensive component in the production of goods. Outsourcing acknowledges the labor cost to produce a particular product is cheaper if the manufacturer were to produce the same product in-house where the cost per unit is significantly higher. Stable labor costs are important for long-term revenue projections to be relied upon by managers because they are a precursor of where a company is trending financially. It is this efficiency-in-scale that confirms the benefit of the division of labor memorialized by Adam Smith. As a result of the wage disparity between the costs of American workers versus Chinese workers, hundreds of U.S. based firms relocated all or part of their operations to China, taking advantage of the inexpensive labor market and the many cost-saving incentives offered by the Chinese government.

Poisoning was found in dog food and toothpaste. Defective tires and toys with lead paint were found. The safeness of these products is at an ultimate low. They are unsafe on all kinds of standards whether it be from food to cars, to even children 's toys. Therefore,U.S. items are more secure than items made in China and U.S. items ought to be purchased over China made items. According to Christine Dantz, of the European Union, “...products 'made in China ' have also made the top of the European Union 's (EU) unsafe list... Defects include: Small parts that could break off and cause children under the age of 3 to choke, harmful chemicals and heavy metal dangers, and Electronics that short circuit and pose a fire danger” (European Union: 'Made in China ' Products are NOT safe page 1). Ms. Dantz explains how items 'made in China ' have likewise made the highest point of the European Union 's unsafe checklist. They come with deformities including small parts that could sever and cause kids less than 3 years old to choke, destructive chemicals and substantial metal risks, and Electronics that short out and represent a flame peril. This is all coming from products being produced in China. These products create risks on various different levels whether it be from children 's toys to metals to electronics. This goes to show how dangerous and unsafe ‘made in China’ products can be. Brett M. Decker explains, “In April 2011, the Food and Drug Administration issued 197 import

Since the financial tsunami and the bankruptcy of Lehman’s Brother in September 2008, the world’s economy took a deep plunge and the Chinese economy is no exception. In the wake of the global financial crisis, The Economist (2008) reported that China’s real GDP growth slowed to 9 percent in the third quarter of 2008 and export growth slowed to 21.1%. It was, in fact, well below analyst expectations and recent

The ongoing economic rise in China effects the US in many ways, including things that some people wouldn’t even consider. It can be seen that the Chinese are beginning to need more jobs, but can that be because some of theirs are being given to us? And, that’s not the only thing they’re giving us. China has the proven to be worst pollution in the world, and it has gotten to the point where the polluted air has travelled overseas to the US, and has begun to take a toll on us. But, they’re not only giving to us. Because of it becoming harder to find jobs, the students push themselves to the limit to become perfect, which could create competition with graduates here in America.