How Regulatory Agencies Are Mandated And Leaders From Abusing Laws

Regulating a variety of aspects of business and society is an old and often controversial aspect of government, particularly at the national level. Much of what the national government does, or fails to do, has an impact on individual citizens, private corporations and other business enterprises, agricultural producers and marketers, foreign governments, labor unions, and state and local governments.

I see myself as a potential asset to such companies who require meticulous adherence to rules and regulations. The hierarchical nature of such institutions will enable me to instill a sense of support and belonging to other employees within the organization. Since, I have dedicated the

The federal bureaucracy is the group of government organizations that implement policy. The federal bureaucrats belong, for the most part, to the group of government agencies led by the president’s cabinet (the collection of appointed officials tasked with leading various federal government departments such as the State Department, Department of Homeland Security etc.) (Geer et al.). These department heads, known as cabinet secretaries, are appointed by each new president. The federal bureaucracy is responsible for writing regulations that implement the laws. In this, the federal bureaucracy’s importance cannot be understated. Congress passes laws, the president signs them, but it is the responsibility of the bureaucracy to actually implement them in the most effective, unburdening way.

In comparing the work between government and private sectors, Smith discovered EOs in corporate settings are primarily concerned with overseeing the ethical conduct of all employees within the organization which expands cases involving waste, abuse, fraud and poor management. In examining the role of EOs in public service, Smith resolved the research to be very challenging due to the various roles and responsibilities, lack of uniformity in job descriptions, and the inconsistencies in the diverse layers of government. (Smith, 2003). The availability of research on the definitive roles of EOs in the private sector enabled him to identify the commonality of the functions and characteristics of EOs in both cultures. (Smith,

in politics, and even individuals in administration, are destined to get “dirty hands.” The concept implicates that individuals who interact in either of these realms cannot help but engage in conduct that is either unethical or, at the very least, less than desirable. Although, many researchers acknowledge that there does exist separate meaning between the roles of political constituents and administrative staff, many believe there are also plenty of similarities. In examining the political/administrative dichotomy, researchers have found extreme overlap in some instances, which emphasizes the probability that administrative staff can also find themselves with dirty hands. Many argue that it is absolutely necessary, in some instances, for individuals to act deceptively with a lack of transparency in order to reach ultimate goals with desirable ends. These ends might include advancing the bigger goals of the organization or preventing the fall of the organization as a whole. However, the

Accreditation provides a competitive advantage in the health care industry and strengthens community confidence in safety of care and treatment. Accredited hospitals provide higher quality of care to patients. It improves risk management and risk reduction and helps in organizing and strengthens patient safety efforts. It enhances recruitment and staff education and provides education on god practices to improve healthcare operations. The paper discusses how The Joint Commission assists in having better outcomes in terms of safety in Western Medical Center Hospital. In today’s society, every health care organization should provide a proof of accreditation and are subject to a three-year accreditation cycle. The Commission develops performance standards that address some of the important elements of operation, such as patient care, infection control, medication safety, and patient rights.

Question #1: The government in its duties and responsibilities to its citizen sometimes needs to regulate the behaviors and actions of private citizens or corporation for the common good. Most of the time regulations are designed by statute but the enforcement of the statues are carried out by regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Election commission (FEC). Regulatory agencies don’t just exist at the federal level either, Federal regulatory agencies like the FDA and FEC carry out federally mandated regulations passed down from Congress of the executive branch but the same principle applies at the State and Local levels as well who have regulations passed down from their individual statehouses and governor's

Setting higher standards for those persons in positions of authority and power over the public establishes a prescribed set of standards for which the public expects to be upheld if authorities are to successfully exude their power and authority over the people. Williams and Arrigo state “Along with power comes an increased responsibility to use it in appropriate ways” (2012). As can be seen in current events, when officials abuse the authority by excessive use of force, kickbacks, or unethical or immoral behavior, the public loses trust and respect for the system as a whole, not just for the individual or individuals in question. An expectation of increased morality and value is expected in persons holding positions where the enforcement of laws, societal values and morals are rendered. Williams and Arrigo further state “…with the presence of increased power, discretion, and thus opportunity, the need for morality increases considerably”

There is a direct correlation between an officers trust in an officer’s administration and misconduct. As explained by Wolfe and Piquero (cited in Pollock 2015) they found that, “those [officers] who believed their organization was fair were less likely to engage in the code of silence or believe in noble-cause corruption (p. 207). In agreement with that there is also a correlation between an organizations unfairness and negative behaviors (Reynolds as cited in Pollock 2015 p.

Black was allegedly laundered millions of dollars for a Detroit drug trafficking ring through an offshore account in the Cayman Islands, with connections in Colombia, for which he made a 25 percent commission (Covell & Walker, 2013, p. 222). A person like Tank Black is a person you want to be very protected from and don’t want to encounter, which the bureaucracy structure helps really prevent. In a bureaucracy structure, decisions are made through an organized process and a strict command and control structure is present at all time (Kermit, 2016). Everyone in a bureaucratic organization is expected to behave according to company policy (Kermit, 2016). The things that an agent can do can also have an effect on you such as when Tank Black lost his $3.6 million signing bonus, which Black had invested in a pyramid scheme that promised a 36 percent annual return on loans made to people who used their car titles as collateral (Covell & Walker, 2013, p.222), but the bureaucratic structure will take action on an agent for using these type of tactics, which is why the bureaucratic structure is on your side to protect you and cause many agents to operate by the

Ethical leadership practices shape and support trust, and trust is decided to a great extent by the conduct of the

However, despite Max Weber’s theory that bureaucracies are like iron “iron cages” that are a efficient form of administration. Prior to modern government reform patronage, spoils, and bribery were just part of the political environment for Public Administrators. In today’s, modern government Public Administrators are hired based on the merit and technical qualifications that secure the individual can carry out the duties of the office. However, Public Administrators are forced to work in a hierarchical organization

Courts expect administrators to behave like them in their regulatory functions. This does not happen, that is why people refer their cases to the courts if they feel that they have been unfairly treated. Regulatory administration revolves around three basic values: procedural fairness, substantive correctness of decisions, and achievement of public policy goals (Kettl, 2015).

Weber states that organizations regulations are formed by few people and this people are the boss, administration employee who tends to have representation powers (Roth and Wittich, 1968). Weber states that the state tends to use bureaucracy on its people in order to establish authority. Bureaucracy is present in various areas in the environment and once bureaucracy is produced then it becomes difficult to

There are various government structures in organizations although they are different from one branch of the government to the other. The structures help the government manage its economy efficiently. In the economy a too big to fail firm (TBTF) exists and it is defined as one that its complexity, size, critical functions, and interconnections are in the sense that in case the firm goes into liquidation unexpectedly, the rest of the economy and financial system will face severe consequences. The government provides support to TBTF companies not because they favor them but because they recognize implications for an advanced economy of allowing a disorderly failure outweighs the cost of avoiding the failure. Helping the TBTF firms enable the economy to realize high revenue. Various activities are to prevent their failure. They include providing credit, facilitating a merger, or injecting the capital of the government. The paper addresses the structures of the administration and the concept of too big to fail in financial and non-financial institutions plus the ethics involved with the theory.