How Schools Should Limit Food

Do you think your school needs improvements? I think my school has a few, but the lunches are easily the most recognizable. The school board should change our lunches because they are microwaved, they are not filling, and the school lunches have the same thing every day of the week. Seriously, none of the kids like them, so just get us brand named foods.

During the entire speech, her pathos was very dominant to the argument. She starts out her speech with an anecdote, so she can establish a personal emotional connection with her audience. In her second paragraph she uses the sentence, “... decades before valet parking, fondue lunches, and gear

Regulations for foods, served in public schools are a matter of great concern as it is essential for the purpose of creating a healthier lifestyle for children studying in public schools. The government has supported several children through the free education and free food program. But the quality of this food is not at par with the standard of the food quality approved by nutritionists so it needs to be changes.

In the article, “Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough,” by William Rice the article talks about the act Michelle Obama enforces. Healthy, Hunger Free Kids act is found very pointless if the food kids are served still aren’t healthy. Even though this act has been active for 15 years, and 30 million kids have become involved, this act hasn’t been useful. Kids needs are neglected and ignored in Healthy, Hunger Free Kids act.

The first lady has sought to find a solution to the issue of food desserts. She tries to explore ways how to combat this problem through suggesting solutions such as getting communities together to bring healthier food in areas that are of need. He campaign is called “Let move” and it is under the subjects or promoting a healthier initiative among this community in Philadelphia. This initiative is geared towards childhood obesity across the nation. She gives a sense of solidarity to the people when the first lady states, “You decided first that no family in this city should be spending a fortune on high-priced, low-quality foods because they have no other options. You decided that no child should be consigned to a life of poor health because of what neighborhood his or her family lives in. And you decided that

The government controls the amount of calories in a school lunch to make sure kids get a fulfilling lunch. Although schools cannot make them buy a healthy product they control what they put out for the kids to eat. The healthy, hunger-free kids act in 2010 signed by former President Obama has helped all it can in bringing down obesity.

In LAUSD, students throw away over $100,000 in food every day. That adds up to a loss of around $18,000,000 annually, which is 10% of their food, wasted (Watanabe). Our nation's schools are losing billions of dollars annually, and our weak economy is paying for school meals that many students refuse to eat, despite the efforts of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act.The government is making attempts to reduce childhood obesity by regulating school meals, PE, and health education, but it has all been to no avail. The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act is actually harming both the kids and their schools because the meals are more expensive, the yen up unappetizing, and many kids are left with empty bellies.

The clock reads 11:39, in a few seconds the most important bell of the day will ring--the lunch bell. This bell sends students rushing to the cafeteria; some students will sit quietly at a table unpacking their lunch from home, others will wait in line to receive a lunch provided by the school. Everyday across America more than 31 million school lunches are served. The majority of these lunches fall under the regulations of the National School Lunch Program. The program, funded and regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), has raised many questions among American citizens. One very important question is whether or not the government should be allowed to regulate/ban certain foods in the nation's school system. The government,

Through this experience, it can be compared to other schools how districts claims how changes for the good will be made but still barely shows any improvements. Therefore, Michelle Obama might have felt through this experience that there is a need to do something about the whole school lunch issue. This proves that lunches that are being provided in schools really are, not as healthy and nutritious as it was hoped to

School lunches are different in different schools, the meals and the sides. Obesity in the population has grown a lot in America. Schools giving out unhealthy foods to children is making the problem even worse.

The problem with school lunches have been rising over all of America and something needs to be done about it. Obesity has been a huge problem in the next generation of kids in school, kids are leaving schools obese or overweight which cannot happen. I have reason to believe that something can be done in order to help the school lunches improve and to become what students need. Many different organizations help schools and their lunches with these sort of problems. Furthermore, if we don’t want the organizations we can just fix this dilemma ourself, but these organizations are still very helpful. Including what Jamie Oliver did in his food revolution and do that same thing in our schools, we can apprehend the situation and refine the school lunches.

She acknowledged the decline in childhood obesity and the accomplishments of the new W.I.C. program. I think that the change in this program was necessary and a great help to these low-income families who were forced to eat extremely unhealthy just because they didn’t have the resources to go to supermarkets that supplied these types of healthy foods. Yes this program helped a lot but low-income families are not the only people who struggle with obesity in America. The article stated that the next step for the government would be to apply these changes to all federal food stamps. I think by doing this the government is taking a step in the right direction. There is more that needs to be done with this issue in the United States. The way our economy is set up it is extremely difficult for people to avoid obesity so I believe the government should try to step in help as much as they can. Americans are indirectly allowing this lifestyle to continue by not doing anything about it. There is a lot of controversy about Obama Care and people complain that they are paying for the health concerns of others. This relates to the issue of obesity because people will have to pay for the health concerns of the people in our country who are eating unhealthy and could get many life threatening diseases. The author states:, “…when it comes to battling obesity, we all need some of the will power that only government can provide (Talbot,

Mrs. McIntyre spoke very well but a few things she said stuck with me. She talked about how many commercials have everyday animals and objects that are now speaking. The keynote speaker was trying to say that we need to step our game up in society because everyday things are now

Should changes be made to the regulations for the foods that are served in public schools? This can be a very controversial question to most people; children with obesity, parents who do not care and for who does care about the health of the children and teachers who only wants what is best for the benefit of the children. This paper will attempt to explain and convince the unknown of why it is very important for our public schools to have a healthy eating curriculum for the children that attends there. If society can find a way to come together for the children of the community to fight to have healthier foods in the community, come together and provide counsel to the children of what healthy eating is all about. This paper will

"Health is like money, we never have a true idea of its value until we lose it" (Josh Billings, 1865). A healthy lifestyle is dependent on the choices of an individual 's diet. Junk food will fulfill the desire of one for a short period of time. However, a healthy and maintained body will fulfill the need throughout one 's entire life. Therefore, is maintaining an unhealthy diet full of sugar and life-threatening junk the perceptive decision? As perceived, healthy food habits are not something that should be averted, thinking it is petty. In fact, it is a serious matter that destroys many lives and thoughtful actions must be conveyed immediately. Hence, it must be mandatory for YRDSB schools to ban junk food as it will reduce the high chances of obesity, cause students to stay concentrated during class and require students to stay active.