How Scientific Information Can Have A Negative Impact On Theological Thoughts

I have chosen the article, Does Science Threaten Religion? (p. 497) as my focus for this tutorial. I strongly believe the article uses the structural-functionalism approach as well as scientific sociology.

When dwelling into the explorations about science and religion, one can find it quite amusing. "If science and religion are to continue to coexist it seems opposed to the conditions of modern thought to admit that this result can be brought about by the so-called

. . the science of Christian faith and life.” Saint Augustine in the fifth-century defined theology as “Rational discussion respecting the deity.” A. H. Strong, the great twentieth century theologian said that theology is “the Science of God and of the relations between God and the universe.” Simply put, Theology is the study of God, and I believe there is a one true God, Jesus Christ. I also believe that theology can be used as a tool to try and understand God, gaining wisdom and in the pursuit of a better

When “why” is asked overlapping of the two sciences occurs, serving as a reminder of the harmony between the laws of “nature” and “mind” and the intelligible order of the universe. While science searches for autonomous structures, theology searches for dependence upon Gods’ revelation and purpose in the historical. However, both are “observer-conditioned.”

There are many things that go into theology. Such as certain documents like Apostles’ Creed or studying the Bible. How do we study the Bible or any theology? You can study theology by taking different approaches towards it. Historians say that the best approach to take an “historical approach”. This approach causes you to learn more about how religion worked back in the olden days. A way to make this approach more doable is breaking it down into different time frames or eras. While breaking it down into more eras also sort out what was significant

1.there is a God and he has revealed himself. 2. That there are laws that are self-evident. 3. That man has the ability to know things to the degree to which he directly observes them. 4. That truth does not contradict itself,but is consistent and corresponds to reality. And 5. That the

Currently, there are many conflicting views on of the study of theology, most of which have evolved over time. The suffix “logy” has traditionally referred to the study of something, whereas the prefix “theo” can mean God or divinity. Therefore, the original definition of the word theology is the study of God or divinity. Although this is true, theology is also known as a discourse on God, meaning that it requires critical thinking and discussion, rather than just acceptance. Over the years, perceptions of the word have changed, and most people now believe that theology applies only to Christianity, although theology can technically apply to any religion with a God.

Science and religion might be translated as different impressions of a similar source, and it is distortions in those reflections that prompt to chaos and misery. Religion and science both have defects that can imperil human progress if they do not acknowledge each other’s elementary principles. "Religion is not only dangerous and misleading but…sentient beings are generally too weak-willed to reject it” (269). When one acknowledges either science or religion with no endeavor to accommodate the two productively, the final result is normally disastrous. At the point when scientists and theologians take part in battle for the absolute entirety of people, nobody wins, but when they engage in dialogue, the fruits are enormous.

Just what is theology? This question can have a wide variety of answers, from irrelevant facts about God thought up by men centuries ago, to complicated theories discussed by scholars. Typically, the average 21st century man does not consider theology as relevant. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth. Theology by definition has the characteristics of both expounding the truth, and impacting the believer with that truth (Himes, 2011). Therefore, theology and the church are intricately combined, in that the church embodies the revelation of God, and is reality, not theory (Himes, 2011). A personal practical theology must begin with revelation, not the individual (Himes, 2011), and proclaim

the writer explains that science certainly cannot answer any questions involving religion. Religion is an opinion and a personal belief that cannot be falsified, therefore science cannot provide answers. Questions having to do with opinions, beliefs of religion, or anything of such nature cannot be answered scientifically.

Theology is the study of God. This includes who He is in person and personality. This is an absolutely fundamental belief of Christianity.

During the time in which the Bible was written, there were many scientific discoveries that we are aware of currently, that were not yet founded. Common thought is that Religious beliefs mostly go against scientific discoveries, but in reality, with correct interpretations, the bible foreshadows science that was beyond its time. Through all 66 books of the Bible, hints to the discoveries of many facts that we know today are found. Few people can completely understand their religious stance until they understand how the bible and science fit together. To any person, whether religious, a scientist, or both, the relation is found interesting to anyone willing to be educated.

Theology and science are different beliefs. Science tends to explain every aspect of life in the most elaborate and

Science “aims to save the spirit, not by surrender but by the liberation of the human mind” (Wilson, 7). Both religion and science seek to explain the unknown. Instead of surrendering reasoning with the traditional religion, a scientific approach one takes full authority over it. Being an empiricist, Wilson takes favors the scientific approach to the question: “why are things the way they are?” This question can pose two meanings: How did this happen, and what is the purpose. Traditional religion answers this question with stories, many of which are impossible to prove or disprove, making them arguments of ignorance. These explanations entail the adherent surrender reasoning and put faith in the resolution. According to Wilson these are always wrong (Wilson, 49). Science is the most effective way to learn about the natural world. Religion is merely speculation.

Thomas Aquinas makes a strong argument for theology being a science. He demonstrates how a follower of Christ and a nonbeliever could use a scientific method to come up with absolute proof with axioms provided by Holy Scripture. A problem could takes place when someone misconstrues the word of God and forms absolute beliefs on incorrect interpretation of Scripture. Theology leaves no wiggle room for improvement once an absolute syllogism