How Secrecy is Presented in The Millers Tale Essay

Interestingly, Miller stirs up dramatic tension once again with Mary Warren’s evidence as the audience ponder whether she is brave enough to stick to her story without Abigail’s influence. However, we learn that Danforth is much gentler with the girls Mary “Sit you down, children” and “Now, children” than he is with Mary “If so, her neck will break for it”. The subsequent effect is that Mary is now predisposed to follow

Alison defies one's expectations. Described by the narrator as a church-going woman nonpareil, she presents herself unflatteringly in her prologue. Blinding herself to her immorality with her verbose diatribe, she interprets the scriptures, classical literature, and mythology to suit her immediate needs. By interpreting Alison's tale as wish fulfillment, however, one can grasp for a handle to her motives, hopes, and agenda. The hag exploits the knight as a means to an end, to be young and beautiful. As she gets older, Alison's fading features will not sustain her narcissism. To love herself, she must be beautiful, even if only in the eyes of her next husband.

Throughout the Canterbury Tales, various characters are introduced and tell a tale, each of which tells a different story. All of the tales are unique and address different issues. “The Miller’s Tale” is the second of the many stories and varies from all of the rest. As seen from the “General Prologue,” Chaucer clearly depicts the Miller as a crude, slobbish man who will say anything. This reputation is held true as the Miller drunkenly tells a story full of adultery and bickering. Despite the scandalous nature of “The Miller’s Tale,” the story also displays some of Chaucer’s prominent beliefs. As “The Miller’s Prologue” and “The Miller’s Tale” are told, it becomes evident that Chaucer is challenging the common roles and behaviors of women, and he is also questioning the effectiveness of social class.

cheats Alan and John out of a fair amount of grain, and the scene  where

Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales are some of the most widely read and anthologized pieces of medieval poetry. These tales are generally celebrated and enjoyed because of the author’s use of wit and satire, as Chaucer often uses word play and characterization to deliver hard-hitting, yet entertaining truths about his time period. This is the case in “The Miller’s Tale,” which portrays the story of a carpenter with an adulterous wife and the shenanigans that take place during and after one of her affairs. After closely examining “Absalom’s Revenge,” the last section of this tale, it is clear to see that Chaucer uses language, puns, and other writing techniques to provide a commentary on the lewdness of some who lived during the Middle Ages.

Through the characterization of Abigail’s Machiavellian nature, playing her uncle for a fool and using lies and her deceit to achieve power, Miller enables the reader to draw a direct feministic comparison between her and the powerless woman in The Crucible. The use of adultery and its connection to humiliation and lack of respect allows for a greater representation of Elizabeth’s and Proctor’s relationship with respect to Abigail. Elizabeth is victimised as she finds herself stumbling through her husband’s evident adultery “(Abigail) charge lechery on you, Mr. Proctor! and his reprimands “Enough… Elizabeth! “I’ll whip you”. Submissive to his anger and with her own “She’d dare not call out such a farmer’s wife!” Elizabeth understands that it is Abigail who has driven a wedge between her and Proctor’s marriage. As a result, her situation contrives sympathy, a reaction that is similar to the highly respected Rebecca Nurse who Hale has “heard of your giving great charities”. Nurse, as a direct result of Abigail’s machinations is thrown in jail, labelled a “witch”. The helplessness of these woman is directly attributable Abigail’s lust for influence and recognition and represents the power imbalance between the woman of Salem.

In "The Miller's Tale," the character of Alison is introduced as the 18-year-old wife of a carpenter who is much older than the woman. The author's description of the young wife seems to suggest that she was so wild, beautiful, and desirable that the old man had a difficult time containing his jealousy.

In the prologue Chaucer talks about many of the characters. He often tells stories and describes how they act and how they are. From being members in the church to having a good and bad reputation in the town, all the characters are unique in their own way. Chaucer describes the summoner, pardoner, and the friar by using indirect characterization in each of their stories.

The message that Arthur Miller is trying to get across is that lying to get what is wanted will not always turned out as planning. Abigail lying all began when she went to the woods and casted a spell on Elizabeth, John Proctors wife, so

Miller’s ideology of integral compromise underpins the characters representation, in particular Proctor and Elizabeth. He prompts the audience to judge their relationship through their interactions. “There is a pause. She watching him from the table as he stands there absorbing the night. It is as though she would speak but cannot. Instead, now, she takes up his plate and glass and fork and does with them to the basin. Her back is turned to him. He turns to her and watches her.” (Act 2). The relationship between Proctor and Elizabeth is distant and awkward, as represented through the couple staring at each other’s back without the other knowing. They have so much to say but cannot and will not. Furthermore, when “[Proctor] gets up, goes to her, kisses her. She receives it.” (Act 2). The long sentence structure of Proctor’s actions leading to the kiss indicates a romantic and poetic tone. However, Elizabeth’s brief and detached response conveys a disconnected bond. Rightfully so, as their current relationship is the aftermath of a multitude of conflicts: Proctor’s affair, his internal conflict between his morals and reputation and Elizabeth’s personal insecurities. By representing their

Alison in the Miller's Tale and May of the Merchant's Tale are similar in several ways. Both are young women who have married men much older than themselves. They both become involved with young, manipulative men. They also conspire to and do cuckold their husbands. This is not what marriage is about and it is demonstrated in both tales. What makes the Miller's Tale bawdy comedy and the Merchant's tale bitter satire is in the characterization. In the Miller's tale we are giving stereotyped characters. The principals are cardboard cut-outs sent into farcical motion. The Merchant's Tale gives us much more background and detail of the character's lives. The reader is more involved and can

In both “The Miller’s Tale” and “The Reeve’s Tale,” Chaucer uses deception and cunningness as a form of persuasion. In “The Miller’s Tale,” Nicolas utilizes his cunningness to persuade Alison to have an affair with him. As he begins flirting with her,

     During the time period in which Chaucer wrote The Wife of Bath women were most commonly seen as prizes won by men. They were treated merely as objects of housework and sex. Although, women of Homer’s time period were not degraded as severely, both periods did not allow the due respect women should have received. The Wife of Bath is an exact antithesis of this view. The Wife of Bath, known as Alison, is the complete opposite of the typical woman of that time. In fact, she acts more like the husband in the marriage. She tells stories of how her first three husbands suffered greatly at her hands. Alison also goes on to describe how

The author in the Black Robe article depicts the inaccuracies of the film such as how no Indian of New France would have agreed to a 1,500 mile expedition in the middle of the winter. The only knowledge we have to go off of reviewing the past is based on the historical letters the missionaries’ wrote their superiors. In The Crucible the author Arthur Miller portrays young Abigail Williams to have had an affair with the elderly John Proctor, records show that Abigail was eleven and John was sixty. The movie based on Arthur Miller’s play portrays Abigail played by Winona Ryder as a young woman who is sexually attracted to John played by Daniel Day-Lewis who is looks to be middle aged. Historians would argue the view based on Miller’s play of the girls’ behavior most likely being a cry for attention based on historical facts and records rather than the play viewing their behavior of accusing numerous victims of practicing witchcraft based on their parents’ enmity toward their neighbors and the girls’ hysteria to sexual frustration as a consequence of puritan repression. When data based on records of marriages and births shortly after marriage shows that communities in puritan New England had an extremely low rate of premarital intercourse. In The Patriot article the writer mentions numerous inaccuracies in the film. There was no such person as Benjamin Martin played by Mel Gibson who led the rebel militia. Also historians argue that although the character Colonel Tavington who

The power struggle between man and woman has been tangible since the time of Adam and Eve. In Canterbury Tales, written by Geoffrey Chaucer, a plethora of characters share stories that reflect their personalities and lives. Several of these stories revolve around the female position and focuses on the role they play in society. Although women are usually seen as subordinate to the male, in Canterbury Tales, they are portrayed as independent human beings. The Wife of Bath embodies her independence through her dominance over her first three husbands in marriage. Additionally, Alison from “The Miller’s Tale” is representative of this strong female character, for her denial towards the males in her lives, manifests how independent she is.