How Should Animal Testing Be Stopped

At this time and age animals are used like slaves placed in captivity in dark, dusty and dirty cells only to be brought and put through cruel ,painful and inhumane tests. It is cruel to put unprotected animals through such experiments. I also believe it is unethical to make animals live life in a lab cage and intentionally put through harm isolation and distress. We all know how bad it is to feel fearful, frightened and terrified.

Animals and humans are so alike yet so very different. “Less than 2% of human illnesses are ever seen in animals. Over 98% never affects animals.” Is stated on Petas official web page. The food and drug administration also states that 92/100 drugs pass animal tests and fail in humans. I just find it insanely unhelpful (Animal testing) 106,000 deaths a year still happen due to medical drugs that were animal tested, and that’s just in America. That’s not even mentioning the cost of all this suffering. According to many NIH documents, over 6 million dollars can be

The majority of animal research is not drug testing but simple research and genetically modifying animals. Half of all animal experiments are conducted at universities and colleges by students. Animal use in scientific testing can be dated back to at least as far as the 17th century with the Harvey experiments aiming to demonstrate blood circulation. The Cruelty to Animals Act was passed in 1876 by parliament. This was the first legislation aimed at regulating animal experiments. Many tests often produce inaccurate or misleading results, even if a product has blinded an animal it can still be marked to you. Animal testing is no longer a justified method of testing for science for the fact of the new innovative cross-disciplinary technology,

Animals do not suffer from the same diseases that us humans have, for example curing heart failure induced by cutting a dogs aorta will not help to cure heart failure caused by a build-up of cholesterol in human arteries. We waste animal lives everyday and for what? The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. And of the small percentage of drugs approved for human use, half end up being relabeled because of side effects that were not identified in tests on animals. This makes it extremely dangerous to humans, because animal testing is not dependable, it can cause serious side effects to humans that weren’t an issue to the animals during testing.

Many animal activists argue against testing on animals; however, it is not as cruel as it seems. Testing is not as harmful on the animals as people may think, and it has a great purpose. Animal testing continues to advance society in a number of ways. Laboratory testing of animals should not be stopped because it is an effective way to test drugs, leads to important discoveries that save human lives, and it benefits the animals as well.

A big epidemic in testing is that drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe for human consumption. In the 1950s the sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities, was tested on animals prior to its release. There was also the drug Vioxx for arthritis when tested it had positive response on the heart of mice, when the drug was released to humans there were more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market. (Medical Articles and Infographics, 2014)

In the words of Ellen DeGeneres - “If you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal who hasn't done anything? They should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. So, rather than seeing if perfume irritates a bunny rabbit's eyes, they should throw it in Charles Manson's eyes and ask him if it hurts.” (goodreads). This quote holds true for many reasons. Not only are some of the methods used for testing cruel & unusual but also unnecessary. Animal testing is unnecessary as it is ineffective and needlessly puts animals into harm's way.

If scientists were to stop testing on animals years and years of research would go down the drain. We would probably never find a cure to Cancer, Ebola, or Polio! These diseases will probably go uncured for hundreds of years if we stop animal testing in our world today. While you think animal testing is cruel there are thorough regulations set in to make sure testing is done in a humane way. Scientists have been able to advance their knowledge in human health animal health 70% of Nobel prizes were won because of animal testing which the scientist who won found a cure to a major disease. This high percentage means that if we had never done animal testing millions of people might be dead right now! People who had diseases that didn’t have a cure

If you have ever taken a medicine, it was most likely tested on an animal first. If the medicine made you feel better after you were sick, then you are in luck, because many times the same cannot be said for animal test subjects. Test animals are very often subject to horrendous living conditions or inhumane experiments Many animals feel extreme discomfort or even die because of this. Another reason why animal testing is unnecessary is because there are many equally or even more effective alternatives to animal testing that are more humane. Finally, animal testing should be prohibited because it could potentially be ineffective because animals generally aren’t the same as humans. People are abusing and killing

One of those reasons is that animals are not excellent test subjects. Animals are not the same as humans. Using mice and rats to test the safety of drugs in humans is accurate only a mere 43% of the time (Arguments Against Animal Testing). That is less that 50%, therefore, animal testing should not be continued anymore.

According to New York Times, Barnaby J. Feder, a general technology reporter, states that there are new technological advancements such as Human skin, eyes, and lining of the throat, that can be used instead. It is possible to obtain human alternatives because small portions of tissue of any of these can now be grown in test tubes (Feder, New York Times). This could be the answer to not only perhaps get correct answers to human disease, but to stop the use of all animal testing. With these alternatives their will no longer be a need to use animals for any use of research, when you can get much more accurate results using the specific organism that is being researched for. It does not stop there; testing can also now be done virtually on computers, stimulation software, or even volunteers can intake potential new drugs that have no effect to humans (Feder, New York Times). From a simple computer screen, it is so much easier to test on animals because there would not have to have so much expenses, prior to how they are doing so with animals, so much items are used. All these new alternatives must be taken into consideration to stop the use of animals. Not only is there a higher chance of getting more effective results, but it also saves on little animal from harm or possibly even

When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps ensure the safety of drugs for human consumption. Where some are convinced that these drugs tested saves many human lives. Others maintain that these tests serve no purpose in the end because the drugs used fall short to heal human disease. My own view is that testing animals with these drugs is not the most efficient way for animals and humans and because of that we are not exactly similar, making the results unreliable.

Firstly, it’s bad science. The Food and Drug Administration even states that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans. This is because we cannot accurately predict how they will behave in people based on laboratory experiments. And the ones that do pass are still a huge risk because the side effects that were not harming the animal, ends up harming the human. Testing on animals give faulty results. There are more

There are also positive and negative social implications. There is often not a huge amount of success around animal testing. Things that work on animals often don’t work and cannot prove to work on humans. The testing of just one substance can involve using up to 800 animals, and could cost over $6 million. This proves that animal testing is expensive, time-consuming, unpredictable, and not easily reproducible. When an animal test doesn’t end successfully it’s costing a lot of money. This money could be spent on more necessary things that would benefit the public. Animal testing can be dangerous to society and the people who the drugs are tested on after the animals. Usually even if the animal survives the experiment, it

During my time of research online my first sources asserts that drug testing is considered inefficient according from Bailey from the Wall Street Journal who has stated: “Testing drugs on animals is notoriously ineffective. Not only do laboratory animals suffer from confinement and research procedures, but because they present different biologies and physiologies, different species