How Should Assault Weapons Be Banned Essay

While mass shootings cause a huge unnecessary loss of life, most killings in the United States come from murders and crimes. Guns should be banned to lower crime rates. Because “more than 70% of homicides are committed with a firearm” (Cannon n.p.) and 2.

There are many pros to the gun control ban. According to Jacob Sullum’s article, “The Real Point of the ‘Assault Weapon’

The issue of banning assault weapons and large capacity magazines has been debated for years, but has never been discussed with such urgency as it is now. The issue is the banning of assault weapons in our society. Are we the kind of country that allows and encourages its citizens to own weapons of mass destruction? The moral issue we face is banning ownership of these weapons to ordinary citizens while protecting their rights under the second amendment of our Constitution. Considering the bloodshed and death that assault weapons cause in the hands of citizens and criminals, it seems to me that assault weapons do not have a place in our homes and society.

Assault weapons are the newest and the most popular type of firearm. When most people hear the term ‘assault weapon’, they think of an unnecessary weapon and their connections to mass shootings. That type of thinking is necessary when it comes to these types of weapons, and too many those disagree with people who think this way. There arguments are, “This is America,” and “It’s guaranteed in the second amendment,” but the issue is assault weapons have no place in American society outside the military and police use. The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This sentence written by our forefathers says nothing about which weapons are allowed in this country. So it is up to our government to decide which guns are legal and which guns are illegal. From a logical and educated perspective all assault weapons should be banned from public distribution and possession, and be restricted to use by our police and armed forces. This can easily be proven by why the 1994 gun ban was not successful, assault weapon capabilities in the hands of citizens, and solutions to assault weapon control.

If there was some type of ban on assault weapons, many lives could be saved. Assault weapons are becoming very attractive to criminals because of their capacity, “an assault weapon is generally considered to be a semiautomatic weapon with a detachable ammunition magazine and some type of advanced feature typically used in military-grade weapons.”(Assault Weapons) For example, most military-style weapons have high capacity of ammunition, meaning they can kill a lot of people in a very short time. Implementing

The current legislation in America is pushing for an “Assault Weapon” ban, in the hopes of diminishing and stop, mass shootings and gun crime, although the ban of “Assault Weapons” will have absolutely no effect on gun crimes and mass shootings. We as Americans are in a crossroad, dived in this issue we face today, everyone has different views and opinions on how should we approach these assault weapons, that we are constantly being informed on the daily news, commonly used by portrayers of evil. The majority of Americans, that are not informed with the way current gun laws, and restrictions are normally the ones that agree with an assault weapon bar or stricter gun control laws.

The majority of anti-gun advocates voice their opinion that more guns would produce more crimes unfortunately for them there is little to no truth in that claim. In reality, when gun ownership increased the amount of murders diminished as well. When states passed concealed weapons laws there was significant drops in the number of multiple victim shootings occurring, the number of deaths, and the number of injuries at these shootings. In 1997 both Wales and England banned handguns and the instantaneous effect was a 50% increase according to crime research. They never saw a day lower than after the year they decided to ban handguns. It has been proven by many surveys that the banning of guns increases crime rate which in turn proves that gun control is not the answer.

Banned assault weapon is not the way to slow the crime rate down, What it going to do is keep the gun in the hand of people that are going to harm someone and keep them out of the hand of people that are going to use them for hunting purposes. I say this because bad people will alway be able to get there hands on them.

There is almost nothing that absolutely requires one to own an assault weapon as opposed to a less destructive firearm, such as a handgun, as assault weapons tend to be bulky, quite noticeable, and not necessarily accurate. Lastly, opponents of gun control laws argue that an assault weapon ban would spawn an aggressive blackmarket for [assault] weapons, allowing the guns to fall into the hands of criminals and the mentally unstable, as there would be no background checks or regulations whatsoever. Though this is a plausible effect, with an assault weapons ban there would be less guns readily available to circulate this said “blackmarket”.

Anyone who believes strengthening the gun control laws would reduce gun violence is correct. However, if someone wants to kill someone, not having a gun is unfortunately not going to stop him or her. If a gun is not accessible, a person who wishes to kill someone will use another weapon that is accessible, such as a knife or bludgeon of sorts. Banning guns will lessen gun violence, but will bring up a rise in violence with other weapons.

Due to assault weapons about 10,000 people die per year. The use of guns is making individuals afraid to walk outside their own homes. Assault weapons are making self-defense less likely to occur due to the quickness of a weapons’ fire rate. Therefore, many people believe that assaults should be banned, but there are people that believe assault are useful. The world has a vast variety of weapons for many different purposes, thus making bans on certain firearms in attempt to reduce crime are totally useless. Therefore, why should there be bans on assault weapons? Placing bans on assault weapons would only force people to use other weapons, would take away humans self-defense, and would not lower the crime rate.

Many mass shootings have been carried out with semi- automatic military style assault rifles. Would banning these for civilians cause the numbers of mass shootings to go down or could murderers still execute the same amount of persons when armed with a few handguns? Numerous parties argue that criminals would just find other means of murder sans firearms. Murders can be carried out with other weapons such as machetes and even homemade bombs and have the same killing capacity as guns. Banning guns could potentially placate such violence or it could encourage criminals to find other ways to carry out sinister intentions. One thing to consider is the fact that most criminals know or assume that their victims are unarmed. Studies show that mass murderers also tend to set eyes on “soft targets”. Soft targets would be places with lots of people in one area with little to no security. Examples are schools, churches, movies theaters and so on. Gun right advocates will agree that the presence of armed civilians make criminals and terrorists think twice before committing a crime. Statistics support this belief. If a

In addition, opponents of the ban of assault weapons also claim that gun control efforts have thus far proven to be ineffective. According to Mark Gius, "Assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level and states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders" (Gius). Banning high-capacity magazines will not

The United States of America is a nation of massacres by military-type assault weapons. Aware of the deadliness of these weapons and due to public safety concerns clearly outweighing the benefits of personal ownership of military-type assault weapons, the United States passed the 1994 Federal Ban on military-type assault weapons. This ban was notably effective during the 10 years it was in effect. However, the Ban automatically expired in 2004. Since that time, the number of U. S. mass murders has markedly increased. Attempts to reinstate the Ban, most recently the stricter 2013 Ban, have all failed. Nevertheless, the less restrictive 1994 Ban did pass the Senate and House of Representatives at one point and was successful. Therefore, the 1994 Federal Ban on military-type assault weapons should be reinstated.

Although many suicides and murders have been committed by gun usage, Libresco Leah thinks banning assault rifles are pointless; therefore, guns don't kill people, people do.