The Army is in a period of transitioning to a new construct on how it trains and employs Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs). This new idea is called Regionally Aligned Forces (RAFs). The basic concept for RAFs is to align BCTs to a Combatant Commander (COCOM) for use as needed by that COCOM. By being aligned to a COCOM, the BCT and its respective Soldiers will receive specific region cultural and language training and also be provided specific training focus as determined by that COCOM. On a rotational basis units within those regionally aligned BCTs will deploy to their designated region to support the COCOM and in return the unit and Soldiers receive invaluable experiences and realistic training. This essay is to discuss how the Army’s move to RAFs is a great strategic move for the Army on many fronts. Listed are a few of the fronts that the transition to regionally aligned forces addresses. As the Army draws down its forces in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) it has to find ways to remain relevant and useful in a time of budget reductions, smaller conflicts and greater uncertainty across the Department of Defense (DoD). With the reduction in size of the Army and the contraction of forces stationed abroad, there needs to be a plan to address this cultural exposure our forces are losing. In addition, the Army needs to preserve the lessons learned over a decade at war and not fall back into a garrison mindset where realistic training becomes unrealistic and worthless.
A submission to the Faculty of the Joint and Combined Warfighting School in partial satisfaction of the requirements for Joint Professional Military Education Phase II. The contents of this submission reflect our writing team’s original views and are not necessarily endorsed by the Joint Forces Staff College or the Department of Defense.
Furthermore RAF/BCTs have tactical benefits. A regional alignment concept results in the identification and resourcing of the proper regional studies, training towards language proficiency and cultural awareness. The requirement for these skill resulted from the experiences and outcomes of wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Culture and language awareness training gives U.S. forces a better improved understanding of the operational environment, an asset critically beneficial in contemporary combat environments .
Regionally Aligned Brigades/Forces is the vision of the Chief of Staff of the Army and the Secretary of the Army that will provide combatant command with constantly readily available troops that are versatile and responsive. Regionally Aligned Forces are based on an organizing principle that allows the United States (U.S.) Army to provide units that maintain core war-fighting skills complimented with cultural awareness training, language training, and regional expertise. A revised ARFOGEN cycle based on Active Component and 60-month Reserve Component sequence will replace the current Army model. Mission specific training requirements will be communicated, based on combatant command’s require¬ments, and organized through FORSCOM. These
This plan, called the Regionally-Aligned Brigade initiative, would allow Army units from the total military force, active duty, reserve, and National Guard, to more proactively and better support the needs of each combatant commander. At the same time, since training and specific leadership and other skills will be aligned regionally, more expertise will go towards the organization and soldiers who will be better trained for specific issues and specific regions of the world.
The 194th Armored Brigade is a premier Soldier training organization which is part of the Maneuver Center of Excellence situated in Fort Benning, GEORGIA. The mission of the maneuver Center of Excellence and Fort Benning is to provide trained, agile and adaptive combat-ready Soldiers and Leaders; develop the doctrine and capabilities of the Maneuver Force and individual Soldier; and provide a world-class quality of life for our Soldiers, civilians and Army families to ensure our Army 's Maneuver Force remains the world 's premier combat force ready to "Win in a Complex World." Vision: In 2022, Fort Benning continues to be the Army’s best training facility that delivers combat-ready, combined arms maneuver Soldiers
The days of unilateral and conventional battles are history. The Army of yesterday is no longer adequate to deter and defeat our nation’s enemies. Rather, the Army needs to adapt to meet the global challenges of today, and the complexity of hybrid threats. Former Army Chief of Staff, General Ray Odierno stated, “The Army is probably the most flexible, adaptable organization across all the services”. In conjunction with that claim, the Army is implementing the regionally aligned forces (RAF) concept. Through the implementation of the regionally aligned forces concept, our nation’s Army will become a versatile, adaptable and globally ready force. Although the RAF concept is thoroughly sound, it is doomed to fail during its implementation.
The discussion paper from lesson F 101 RA is an above average paper. The paper clearly discusses and answers the question of what force management is and how force management is used to prepare and win the nation’s wars. The paper further discusses in-depth how one will use force management on a daily basis at the battalion and brigade level and what force management issues consist of and look like.
Proper training provides any organization with the fundamental base for successful operations. The importance of training is even more crucial when teams are expected to deploy in small elements and provide commanders with operational and strategic options for the conduct of UW. The modern Jedburghs provide Joint Force Commanders with the capability to conduct the most difficult aspects of UW campaigns by understanding, influencing, and shaping the operational environment, deterring adversary forces, and when necessary, defeating threats to U.S. national security. The operational tempo that 4th BN’s face today obstructs from the operator’s ability to receive advanced unconventional warfare training, military training directly related to the
The Army has endured extreme conflicts with nations over the last 15 years with the concept to fight to win. Overtime, the Army shifted its strategic stance, in order to prevent future conflict, from “fight to win” to “shape and prevent” with RAF. RAF prevents future conflicts by providing CCMD with the precise units to shape host nations around the global through collaborating and training.
The past 14 years of sustained combat operations in two major conflicts paired with increased demand for U.S. Army forces globally have degraded the Army’s ability to conduct missions across the full spectrum of conflict . Proficiency in both of the Army’s core competencies, combined arms maneuver (CAM) and wide area security (WAS) faded, creating unacceptable readiness shortfalls in large portions of brigade combat teams (BCTs). Consider that in 2015, only 12 of the Army’s 32 BCTs were reported as combat ready, or about one-third. Of those 12, nine were deployed in support of combatant commander requirements worldwide, leaving only three BCTs as ready for any unforeseen
According to the Chief of Staff of the Army, GEN Ray Odierno our country’s most recent set of conflicts have made it clear the Army needs to expand their levels of cultural and regional awareness through all units. (Odierno 2012) The Army has decided to answer this problem by creating a regionally aligning forces (RAF) strategy to focus units on a particular geographic region. Brigades, Divisions, Corps, and support forces will focus on a specific region within their normal training program and focus their unit’s scope with cultural training and language familiarization. This redesign will theoretically provide increased support to the Combatant Commands and capitalize on the current Total Force concept to team up the Active, Guard and
In the Army we say “train as you fight”, this concept has been a building block for all soldiers to follow since basic training. In some units, this concept has been ignored as multiple deployments to the same theater has brought about a sense of complacency in the ranks. As the focus of the Army is shifting towards a hybrid threat and we will inevitably be facing a more complex skilled enemy with far better equipment, our approach to training needs to be re-thought.
A study of warfare in the modern era suggest a progression through three distinct generations. Although U.S. Armed Forces are still coming to grips with the third of these, strong trends point to an emerging fourth generation. Those who would prepare for future warfare must consider the trends envisaged here and the challenges they would present to existing forces.
“Train as you fight” is one of the eleven principles of Unit training as defined by Department of the Army as “training under an expected operational environment for the mission. This means establishing in training what the unit can expect during operations to include the culture of an operational environment” (ADP 7-0, 20xx). With the complexity of simulations today, Soldiers are able to train in virtual scenarios without stepping on the actual battlefield. In order to set conditions for that realistic training, accurately replicating combat equipment, mission terrain, and interoperability are key characters with the principle of
The Air Force’s current divisional structure provides is adequate for Command and Control for its Major Commands. By aligning the Commands functional mission and aligning them geographically they can support their customers with specialized services in order to meet their demands. While the current system works, improvements can be made to providing more manpower to the Squadrons and rewriting publications to empower Squadron Commanders to make decisions about their squadron with little oversight from higher echelons. Thus, the tactical echelon will become the core of the war fighting unit.