How The Gun Control Laws Should Be Less Restrictive? Essay

In today’s society the majority of the crimes are still being committed by people who have possessed a firearm that has been obtained illegally or without proper permits. That being said there has been a strong push for gun control because of the rise of shootings involving a large group of people such as the Columbine massacre, Virginia Tech shooting and latest Aurora movie theater shooting involving people who have purchased firearms legally. Gun control laws in the United States have been established for many years but to maintain a civilized society with limited crime stronger control laws need to be enforced in which will help reduce crime in our country. Establishing stronger gun control laws will educate

A very popular controversy in our country, especially around election day, is gun control. Both presidential candidates have a different view of the policy for gun control. Hilary Clinton believes that most of the violence that is happening in America would be tamed if there were tighter gun laws. Donald Trump believes the exact opposite; that guns are not the cause of violence, people are. All over social media people are complaining/praising about the new iPhone update which replaces a gun with a squirt gun. This angers people who own guns because Apple is showing their support to take their second amendment away. What most people who agree with the Gun Control Laws do not realize is that according to the FBI, Knives are used in nearly five

Gun control has become more of a hot topic in recent years. Some believe that there is no need for additional gun control. On the other hand, we have some that believe that the government can improve gun laws. Although many believe that gun control will violate their rights, the idea of stricter gun control laws can help communities.

President obama said at a press conference on October 01, 2015 “The solution to such violence is obvious. It cannot be this easy for somebody who wants to inflict harm on other people to get his or her hands on a gun.” (Simple Minded Gun Control). Gun control is a controversial issue worldwide. The reason why this has attracted so much attention is because not everyone is in favor of gun control and each side brings up excellent points about the issue. Research related to this issue strongly supports the claim that there SHOULD be more gun control laws. Three arguments that prove this position are (1) Incidents like Sandy Hook will be less likely to occur (2) It reduces the high rates of accidental deaths (3) As the years pass by and technology updates the laws should be up to date as well. Members from the National Rifles Association state that No law-abiding American should be forced to face evil with empty hands. I say I agree with President Obama there SHOULD be more gun control laws because it should not be as easy as it is for someone who wants to inflict harm on others to get their hands on a weapon.

Gun control in the United States has been a controversial issue for some time now. So much so that the Supreme Court even refuses to address this issue directly. Gun control really boils down to the the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Many people have different interpretations of the Second Amendment and the trenches are dug in deep on this issue. The Second Amendment can not provide the right to bear all types of arms to protect the people from governmental tyranny. If the Second Amendment was absolute, then we would allow the public to possess nuclear weapons, missiles, and other such arms, because like the 9 mm handgun that is an arm, a nuclear warhead is also a type of arm. The more our government restricts our rights to own

The second amendment gives people the right to own a firearm. The founding fathers might have thought a gun was the best form of protection but many years have past since then and humans have evolved. Times are different and society is different. Technology has a big impact on people and how we think and all those variables can affect people with how they react in stressful situations. We have to consider the mental stability of those in possession of the weapons, it is important to keep the weapon away from loved ones or other people, and is the law protecting those in possession of the weapons or putting lives in more danger.

In 2015, on an average day in America, thirty-six Americans were killed by guns, excluding suicides. How many of those deaths would have been prevented if there were stricter gun laws? How many parents would have lived to see their babies grow up? How many children would have lived to graduate, or get married? Although many Americans believe that gun control takes away their second amendment right it actually increases every citizen’s safety by the use of extensive background checking, checking medical records, and restricting gun distributors.

While many people believe there should be more gun control and the possibility of banning guns all together, I believe the gun control laws should not be changed. Although there are many reasons that may persuade people to choose to ban guns, I believe that there are several other reasons that lead to all the tragedies with guns in America. Banning guns is not an answer the gun problem in America, there are a few other things that could be done to stop gun violence. In this essay I will tell about why I believe gun control laws should not be changed.

But mentally ill individuals are usually unsafe if we make them one. Mental illness does not always lead to violence. In cases where violence occurs, the incident normally results from the same reasons as with a regular person; thus, feeling threatened, excessive use of alcohol and/or drugs, etc. However, some offenses that the mentally ill commits leave the government no option but to incarcerate them. These crimes also draw some people’s attention to the wrong side, making them agree with the government plan to imprison them. One of the cases that I believe contributes to this is Tarasoff v. The Regiments of the University of California’s case. Tarasoff v. The Regiments of the University of California is the case that flickered communities to look more into finding ways to protect the community (imprisoning the ill). This case consists of the premeditated murder of Tatiana Tarasoff by Prosenjit Poddar, who detailed to his therapist that he would commit the murder. Unfortunately, after all the assistance through therapy, Poddar still committed the crime. Situations like these made some people lose hope with psychiatric centers. Instead, they see mentally ill as criminals who are using their illness to their

In the U.S. more than 30,000 people are killed by firearms each year, you can say that we need stricter gun laws. Who should we blame for all of the shootings in America? We should blame the people who pull the trigger, the people who sell the guns, and our government. Gun control is one of the biggest debates because everyone has their own strong opinions. If the U.S. had better gun control laws, then there wouldn't be any gun violence issues.

Mass shootings are now usual occurrence in the United States of America. In 2017, there were 346 mass shootings committed. The United States of America has seen a surge in mass shootings that have not been acts of terrorism, but rather citizens with mental health issues. Many citizens simply believe strict gun control is the solution to these mass shootings. Politicians like to soothe these citizens by saying increasing gun control will prevent mass shooters, but is there evidence to back up their claims or are they just using these tragedies to push their policies? More importantly, is this the main reason these individuals commit mass shootings? I have recently read multiple articles to get insight on how citizens view this situation, most articles

Mental health issues can make anyone have a hard life, they can stem from just a nuisance to taking over your entire life. They are not to be taken lightly, as people can harm themselves or others around them. This is why when someone with a mental health issue commits a mass shooting, they will need to be treated much differently than if it was just a normal person that committed the crime. “Federal gun control policy responses to the Sandy Hook and Aurora shootings strengthen legal prohibitions on gun ownership to individuals with histories of mental illness who are deemed at risk for violence to themselves and/or others” (Rosenberg 2011). With strengthening legal prohibitions it determines who can get a firearm. This keeps everyone a little bit safer, because it can keep those people that have the tendency to act out, not be able to own a firearm. If someone has a mental illness and they are at risk for violence to themselves or others, they should not be able to get a firearm, because that gives them a way to hurt themselves or others and ruin the rest of their

In the wake of the massive school shooting at a high school in Parkland, Florida, we as Americans have been forced to go back and dwell on the issue of gun control. With shootings being on the rise over the past couple years, the media has had some very intense and heated discussions about the issue of gun control. These debates have always led to politicians driving toward gun safety legislation, appeasing the public. This legislation, however, very rarely seems to go through, even though nine out of ten Americans favor basic control such as universal background checks prior to the purchasing of a firearm. Afterward, another shooting happens, and we are forced to go through this process again, much like an endless cycle.

There was a time when students actually felt safe attending school. Now, the sounds of guns being fired will forever be locked into the minds of students, holding the minds captive. Due to recent school shootings and the outcry for lost loved ones on social media, legations and political leaders are profoundly moved and are urged to make guns harder to obtain. Implementing stricter restrictions on gun laws will be beneficial in many ways. Making new, stricter gun laws will potentially stop unnecessary shootings and control who has the ability to have a gun in possession.

Since 1791, the United States has allowed citizens the right to bear arms; citizens have depended on the ability to carry and use firearms. What if that just, went away? Every citizen would give up their firearm and there would be nothing for civilians to use to protect themselves with, at least, not something that they are used to carrying or having in their homes. The government should not restrain the ownership, the use, or me the concealed carry of firearms for the reason that owning guns has shown to lower crime rates; keeping guns prevents the Second Amendment from being violated; and banning guns does not prevent criminals from disobeying the law.