How The Media Portrays Multiple Different Political Issues

Media has been playing a significant role in our daily lives by developing our personalities, enriching our knowledge and providing us with different sorts of information. It has a tremendous power in framing cultural guidelines and shaping political dissertation. If the information provided to the U.S. citizens is distorted, then they cannot make informed decisions on the matters of public policy. Thus, it becomes vital to the American democracy that the news media and its institutions remain unbiased, fair and accurate. Media bias happens when a media systematically and persistently emphasize one particular point of view that is usually below the standards of professional journalism. There can be various reasons for media bias, some of

I had never thought that something I read in the news would so personally affect my life. Before, the media was a layer that shielded me from the true horrors of terrorism. My mom’s voice always weakened when she talked about 9/11, but the sympathy and sadness I felt towards that event was indirect and a result of society’s impression of that tragic day.

The “roots” of bias in the media date back to the nineteenth century, and criticism about bias partly reflects a controversial idea about what exactly is the media’s role and purpose. Newspapers and television alike are suppose to exist to relay objective, factual information gathered and communicated by journalists and reporters.

Attacks receive more coverage when they harm or kill victims, involve hijackings or aircraft, have known perpetrators, and select targets associated with Western countries. A study of transnational terrorism shows that attacks that inflict injuries are twice as likely to attract media attention as those that do not. The attacks in which the perpetrator can be identified are four times as likely to be reported in a newspaper and ten times as likely to be reported on television (The Media’s Role in International Terrorsim). Attacks in the Middle East or Europe are twice as likely to receive media attention as attacks perpetrated in Latin America (The Media’s Role in International Terrorism). There are very similar factors that influence media coverage of attacks that take place within the United States.

An important yet under-discussed issue for our time is the media bias. Everyday free speech is broadcasted across the world but with underlying agendas of communication companies. Many broadcasts engage in the assaulting of political candidates or display of tragedies to prompt viewers to believe the media states the exact truth. However, a majority of people do not decipher the tone and mood of the channels and papers which secretly distribute the opinions of the news company rather than solely the news.

This article will be very helpful in my research project because it helps me understand the media bias argument from a different perspective. Now, my research will have both the liberal and conservative view on media bias. Both authors have very extensive backgrounds as professors which demonstrate their credibility. Although their personal bias could possibly skew their writing, they have numerous statistics to demonstrate the credibility of the research.

Ever since the tragic terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 the media’s top priority every day is covering any and all terrorism. By all acounts, 9-11 remains the single most deadly attack ever on American soil, however terror attacks declined over the last twenty years. Despite the decline in terror activity, media coverage continues to report at an all-time high. Thus, every major news entity worldwide continually provides around the clock terrorism coverage. Deadly carnage streams on a time loops constantly, gruesome amputations and gun shot wounds appear on tvs around the world. The grotesque footage decencitizes millions of people and promotes and kind of glamourizes terrorism. The tv coverage causes wide spread fear, panic, and

The media today is full of coverage about terrorism. From terrorist threats to both unsuccessful and successful terrorist acts.

2. The main points of the article are focused around the way in which news is presented to the public. Through identifying multiple sources of news information, such as the New York Times, Fox News, and an English website, AlJazeera.net, to name a few, the article points out the varying differences and biases generated based upon the omission of certain factual information, the choice of words, and the credibility of the sources. Despite journals being presented with the same underlying information, the information that is presented to the public varies greatly in both the tone and mission from news article to news article. This is further elaborated as a way for the news media to appeal to certain types of demographics. For example, through wording an article in such a way that presents a military action conducted by the U.S. military as a ruthless act of

The Editorial Board believes that the media largely over-reports terrorism. However, to support this claim, they start out by presenting facts, stating that in a 12 year period, only 61 people were killed in the US by terrorists, while 204,753 were victims of murder. This immediate addressal to the counter argument makes the opposing side more likely to continue reading and consider their viewpoint. Providing these statistics make you realize how over-exaggerated this fear of terrorism is. It affects so few people that you’re more likely to be killed by a fellow American than a

To understand what state the modern media system is in, one must firmly understand what bias is. Media bias is present “when a political belief or commercial interest distorts the level of reporting” (“Media Bias” 1). If a political station provides positive or accurate information to only one side, then the station can be considered biased. Another form of bias is known as sensationalism. Sensationalism is the creation of panic or fear by over-reporting or over-inflating individual news stories, often blurring facts or reporting speculation as facts. A modern and familiar example of media

While the article attempts to further the notion that evil terrorists in the rest of the world are out to get innocent Americans, like many other sources of contorted propaganda, it fails to look at why. Through the news,

The event of 9/11 is the most publicized and dramatized terrorist attack in the world. For the past 15years the style and means the media report terrorist attacks has been mostly beneficial to the terrorist the media instigate fear in the public. The public depends on the news most especially social media like Facebook, Twitter and also Television for information about the crisis at hand and instruction about what to

It was about the 9/11 terrorist attack in New York. The terrorist attack known as 9/11 was executed by one of the most famous terrorist groups named al-Qaeda. 9/11 killed many people and was, and is still recognised as the most brutal terrorist attack the United States has ever faced. The article went deep into the mind of Osama Bin Laden. It revealed how they planned the plane running into the Twin Towers, how the attack forced America to suffer in the next years, and what prompted the jihad they declared on America. The terrorist attack, conducted by Osama Bin Laden, frightened America to the point where we became our own enemy. Even Though, The tragedy that is 9/11 was clearly terrorism; if Osama Bin Laden fit in different categories people might not have been so quick to categorize it a terrorism. For example, if a eighteen year old white male committed this crime people would be immediately come to his aid and defend him. People would say that he had mental problems, like they said in the shooting in parkland, or they would blame the parents for not raising their child properly like they stated in the Columbine shooting. Instead, this man was quickly identified as a terrorist, and was then shot and killed in a cave in Abbottabad,

On Easter Sunday, Lahore, Pakistan was next in a growing list of countries attacked on a large by a suicide bomber in the past six months. The bombing, later claimed by Taliban affiliate Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, targeted a park populated with Christian women and children celebrating the holiday. Photos of bloody victims and rescuers soon surfaced as well as first-hand accounts of the explosion. The sheer horror and violent nature of the story and the photos as well as the constant international attention on terrorism makes the story impactful and fits with the unfortunately familiar narrative that has developed in the post-9/11 world. The story broke on Easter morning all over the world, and therefore, it fits four of the five criteria that Doris Graber and Johanna Dunaway set in Mass Media and American Politics for how stories are deemed newsworthy (113-114). However, the final criterion, proximity, is the significant in regards to how the Lahore bombing was and continues to be covered in mainstream media. Both National Public Radio (NPR) and Al Jazeera posted articles on Easter Sunday after the bombing, and while many aspects of the articles are the same, there exist key differences. NPR’s status as a semi-publically owned American media company and Al Jazeera’s status as a government owned Qatari media accompany account for those difference in their coverage the Lahore, Pakistan attacks. The revolution of the new news accounts for their similarities.