How To Ban Animal Testing On Animals Essay

Animal Testing is uncertain and hard. Animals go through a series of tests are very painful, most of the time they are not even given anything for pain. Some product tests require the same painful procedure on a daily basis over a weeks' time. Most tests on animals cause permanent injury or even death. The tests performed on animals are not always reliable. A medicine that may be safe with animals may not be for human beings. For example, aspirin is toxic to cats, so if we were to test this medication on cats, it would not help to determine if this was a safe product for human beings. One alternative to animal testing is human testing, if we are looking to find out if the product works on humans, we should test them on humans. That case "No

Millions of animals suffer due to effects of testing they must endure. This testing is usually done unethically and causes major harm. It’s wrong to harm animals for the sake of testing products for society. Furthermore, animals are living creatures just like humans and should not be treated differently. While testing animals may be cheaper, it is morally wrong and causes many harmful side effects in animals.

Animals do not suffer from the same diseases that us humans have, for example curing heart failure induced by cutting a dogs aorta will not help to cure heart failure caused by a build-up of cholesterol in human arteries. We waste animal lives everyday and for what? The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. And of the small percentage of drugs approved for human use, half end up being relabeled because of side effects that were not identified in tests on animals. This makes it extremely dangerous to humans, because animal testing is not dependable, it can cause serious side effects to humans that weren’t an issue to the animals during testing.

Although large companies and those for animal testing might think that animal testing is essential for products to be declared safe for human use, that is entirely untrue. Animals are not humans, so testing is not accurate. They are also genetically modified and subjected to abnormal stress. According to the FDA, only 5-25% of animal tests and human tests agree, so there is little relevance to humans. Furthermore, only 9% of products tested on animals make it to market. This questions how safe the products really are. What is effective in animals isn’t effective for humans. For example, drugs such as Vioxx, Phenactin, and E-Ferol were not effective in 92% of humans. That is

Animals are not a reliable benchmark for testing because animals and humans have a completely different biological make up. In fact, PETA said that 72% of drugs shown to be effective in humans, have a different response in humans or are harmful to the body (Animal Testing Is Bad Science Point/Counterpoint). Disregarding the fact that some animal testing trials make it to human trials about 100,000 humans lose lives each year from taking prescriptions originally tested on animals(Animal Aid). Concluding that even if tests were to be done on animals, the drugs are not always safe, proving that animal testing can take more lives than needed and is horrifically

Each year in U.S. laboratories, small animals are tortured in several ways such as being deafened, having their skin burned off, and having holes drilled in their heads (PETA, “Animals in Medical Experiments”). These cruel abuses can be prevented if animal testing is eliminated. Animal testing is an inhumane method of research that uses animals to ensure the safety of medicines and cosmetic products for human beings. As suggested by Kristina Cook, small animals such as mice, rabbits, and guinea pigs are the creatures who are subjected most to the torture, but larger animals including primates and dogs are also frequently used for experimentation.

Also animal testing normally will not yield the same results it would on humans. (Zurolo 3) Not only that, animal based tests take too long & are expensive on average. One such case where a drug was safe for animals but not for humans was a drug called Vioxx. In 2005 ,researchers found the drug had a heart protective effect in mice & other animals but the exact opposite in humans and caused heart problems. Once they found out that it caused heart problems in humans they ignored this very fact and instead pointed to the animal tests insisting it was “safe” and the evidence is there. (news -

“Each year, more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing.” ("Experiments on Animals: Overview.") Some believe that animal testing is futile, while others say it is beneficial to science. Testing cosmetic, medical, and chemical products on animals is unreliable, unnecessary, and inhumane.

Most people think that the medicine they take or cosmetic they use is safe because the packaging says it was tested on animals, but they most likely don’t know that hundreds of animals were harmed and killed from the product, and that there’s a chance that it could kill them. Animal testing can help researchers find helpful drugs, treatments, and to see if a substance is safe, but that doesn’t mean that it should be allowed. Animal testing is should be stopped because it’s cruel, unreliable, and dangerous.

Even though, animals help save lives of human beings they still kill animals to save the human being. Imagine a human being killed just to save an animal you wouldn’t like that would you? Everyday uses like: toothpaste, soap, etc. Are not tested on by animals, but cosmetic companies use animals to test their products. The cosmetic companies use the Draize Eye test, they put drops of their products inside an animal's eye and cause irritation.

“It is estimated that more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year. United States, up to 90 percent of the animals used in laboratories are excluded from the official statistics” ("About Animal Testing" n.d.). This is a major increase from the estimated 5.5 million tests done in 1970. Of the 115 million animals, the most commonly used are “mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, farm animals, birds, cats, dogs, mini-pigs, and non-human primates” ("About Animal Testing" n.d.). These animals and much more are subjected to torture and

My first reason is that animal testing harms animals. Over 100 million animals each year are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused. That means 100 million animals torchered just to see if medicine works. Although, some people say that it's the only way to test if medicine works they are wrong. Scientists can use robots, machines, and volunteers to see if medicine works. Animal testing is harmful to animals should not be used.

Animal experimentation is defined as the use of “non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study.” (“Animal research”). Animal experimentation can be dated all the way back to Greek writings during the third century. Aristotle, (384 – 322 BC) a physician-scientists; physician-scientists are physicians who pursue their research interests in the laboratory, and Dr. Galen, (129-200 AD3) known as the “father of vivisection”, stated by, Thomassen, et al. (2), when they began experimenting on live pigs. Aristotle and Dr. Galen began animal experimentation to gain knowledge of the animals themselves, unlike current day which is used for medical research. Animal research

Not all medicines that work on animals work on humans. According to ProCon.org “92% experimental drugs that are safe and effective on animals fail on humans because they don’t work or are to dangerous”. I think that if most medicines don’t work then they should try a different method that works better. Maybe if they used a different method it would be better and more effective. One way to not use animals is called In Vitro. In Vitro is the simulation of living organisms by using things such as petri dishes. It also takes more time to do research on animals rather than using In Vitro. According to ProCon.org “Animals make better test objects because of their shorter life span”. If you use In Vitro you don’t have to worry about animals dying.

Imagine this; you’re a small, shivering rabbit cramped in the corner of your miniature metal cage, attempting to sleep but being kept awake by a persistent pain running throughout your entire body. You have been awake for over 53 hours, undergoing intense experimental research, you're sleep deprived and overwhelmed with pain, and all you can do is tremble with fear and pain hoping for it to come to an end. Fortunately for you it will end, because soon enough scientists are going to decapitate you and remove your brain to study the effects of their experiments. This is just one of the things that scientists do to living breathing animals undergoing research experiments daily, and one of the many reasons why you should wholeheartedly agree that animal testing should be banned worldwide. Animal testing should also be banned because it’s unethical, old fashioned. It’s simply bad science.