How To Build An Autocracy

Moreover, the authors’ inductive reasoning connects the falling rate to the reduced effect of civic learning. By adopting a more logical approach, the authors are able to support their assertion and stress upon the reader the severity of the problem. Similarly, the authors’ appeal to emotion also plays a crucial role in conveying the necessity to encourage students to learn about their government. History shows the reader that America “has long exemplified democratic practice to the rest of the world” and has a duty to maintain those reputable values in the future generations. Democracy in which the country started upon cannot uphold without the contribution of the people it governs.

One reason why Americans shouldn’t be required to vote is because voting without background information might lead to wrong decisions. Evidence supporting this reason is, in document G (New York Times) (Randy Cohen) states that people that are uninformed, will end up voting for something that doesn’t endorse their interests. This evidence helps explain

The Electoral College was created in 1787 to protect this country’s voting system. It is a group of 538 members that directly cast the votes to determine who the next president will be. (Green) However, the issues of the present day can’t help but wonder, is the Electoral College’s system outdated and corrupt? My dialogue’s purpose is to defend the Electoral College and show how it still protects us to this day by using evidence from the most recent 2016 election, and prove that it gave us the best candidate suited for the role of the President of the United States.

Are there “checks and balances?” Is there a separation of power? What role do citizens have in the political process?

Advanced technology and forms of communication have changed the way we look at our nation. The current political climate and the cultural movement that is happening in our nation is going to go down in history as a revolution. A revolution where news headlines are instantaneously on our phone screens, and thanks to our advanced technology, a whole world of information is a few clicks away. However, despite these advancements in technology, the cultural change in America is often slowed down because there is a general lack of education. In America, education is the one, if not the biggest barriers that economically and institutionally suppress an overwhelming amount of the nation’s adults. Majority of adults in America do not have basic reading and writing skills yet education is still not a priority in America. There is a crucial need for education in America, now more than ever. In my opinion, the only reason for the current political climate in America is the lack of education that brings basic awareness. The solution to what we are witnessing as a nation is an education that makes individuals aware of the reality of our circumstances and allows them to see a perspective from multiple points of views. In this paper, I will present my argument on why education should be made a priority in America.

The Electoral College fails to accurately reflect the nation’s popular will; a group of less than 700 people can’t perpetually know the nation’s opinion, this results in plenty (perhaps a majority of) Americans being disconsolate with whom they have as a leader. The group fails to be

Rhetorical Analysis: The primary audience for this paper includes every citizen aged eighteen and above eligible to vote in the United States. The proposed topic mostly concerns these individuals due to the fact, they are affected by presidential voting institutions. Throughout this paper, I will be arguing in favor of the Electoral College, with an end goal of persuading my audience of the benefits of the system.

The distinguished contributors to this instructive volume - including Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Michael Barone, and Walter Berns- show why it would be foolish to abolish the Electoral College by explaining not only its historical and cultural significance, but also its present role in instilling a measure of stability and sanity to our electoral and party systems. This is the definitive volume for all those interested in the logic, and continuing importance of this unique American political institution.

In addition, proponents of the Electoral College ground their objections in the Republican tradition alongside the American government system. In this view, defenders contend that the Bill of Rights, judicial review, and the executive veto introduce numerous complexities. Therefore, suppose any prudish lucidity is to become the standard approach of deciding the things that should remain and those that requires simplification in American government, then nothing would remain. As Diamond argues, very few Americans have shown interest in politics and the overall knowledge of an average voter is partial (218). Taken together, the idea that voters are unknowledgeable led to the present condition of understanding the Electoral College, as many people misconstrue its dealings. In a different line of defense, proponents of Electoral College argue that it contributes to the political stability of the country. In detail, the College encourages a two-party system while depressing propagation of fragment parties like those seen in many European

While Moore makes a good case for essential requirements he contradicts himself when he admits he was a college dropout. This does little to persuade the reader to agree with his perceptions of what should be taught in schools. His points again, may fall on deaf ears because when he mentions top universities and refers to the enrolled as “ignorant students” it can make people turn into a defensive mode and do little to support his opinions.

Even though Alexander Hamilton accurately predicted foreign powers attempting to gain a stake in the American election, he missed several other pitfalls in the Electoral system, and those are all becoming apparent in modern times (Salon). Currently, the issue leaves the public feeling as though they are unrepresented, and this not only weakens the trust Americans have in their government, it weakens the process of determining a new president

As politics and government becomes more complex and involved, more effort is required to keep up with and understand it. As a result, many Americans have lost touch with current events and happenings. Therefore, when election time rolls around, many people lack enough information to develop an educated opinion and support a candidate with their vote, so they just do not vote at all. This lack of information is also related to the belief that one vote will not matter. People believe that their vote will not count, and are therefore following the news less and becoming out of touch with public affairs and politics (Is the System Broken?”). This lack of information is also more strongly apparent among the younger voting population. When interviewed

Michael Moore’s main goal in “Idiot Nation” was to give his opinion on the unethical educational system of America. Also to show how corrupt and poor political decisions have caused schools to look to corporate funding for money. Moore argues that politicians have neglected the educational system. This neglect has allowed for corporate businesses to come in and solve their problem but with their own priorities in mind and not the futures of the children. Throughout “Idiot Nation” Moore gives examples of ignorance in America and gives us more insight on why he has such a negative view on the educational system of America.

In “Idiot Nation,” Michael Moore discourses on the collapse of American education system and the three main reasons behind it: politicians’ ignorance, shortage of teachers, and the rise of Corporate America. Moore first points out how ignorant the President and politicians are by stating that the President cannot simply identify whether Africa is a nation or a continent. Next, Moore attributes the lack of funding in education to the fact that politicians prefer to build bomber than to improve our education system; this leads to shortage of resources, overpopulated classrooms, and decrease of books available for students. He then notes that the low salaries of teachers, which are caused by the insufficient funding of education, result in

Why do Americans have limited amount of political knowledge? It’s because the public lacks interest in politics. They rely on group/party loyalty, rather than reasoning. Their responses change randomly from survey to survey. Recent research shows that the public knows some basic things. For example, they know the location of the capital and the length of president’s term, but they lack knowledge about other basic things. About 50% know there are 2 senators for each state, and only 66% know which party controls the House. They show high instability of their preferences, so explosion of information sources has not helped. The authors Greenburg and Page believe that political “trivia” may not be a good measure of adequate knowledge. They also mentioned that the reason for the instability of preference is because people change their minds and reflect on multidimensional ideology. It’s understandable that American citizens have lost trust in the government as well as interest, but the group of people that show the least amount of interest in politics and voting are the young generation.