How To Legalize Marijuana In Canada

Gun control has and probably will always be an issue that is argued for or against from all political sides, regardless, of your own beliefs one must look at the pros and cons of gun control to determine what is necessary. To address this, we must first look

Gun violence is serious social problem and Canada has a long history of firearms control. However, increasing costs to the Canadian Firearms Program (CFP) has made it a lightning rod for criticism from both pro and anti-gun advocates. Reports out of the media and Auditor General Sheila Fraser paint a picture of inefficiency, incompetence and mismanagement.

The liberal view on gun control believes that more gun control restrictrictions would harm the common law abiding citizen of the united states. Another one of the liberal sides main argument is that most of school shooters take guns are obtained legally.

The Republican Party is extremely supportive of all the laws for less gun control while the Democrats want more gun control. The Republicans have always been advocates of less gun control because of their belief in the Second Amendment. I believe the following quote from “Republican Views on Gun Control” (2013) sums up their ideology on the subject: “The GOP (“Grand Old Party”) is keen to point out that the Republican position on gun rights does not flow from a fondness for weapons, but from a fundamental principle that calls for upholding certain rights that the nation was built upon. Republicans believe that governmental regulation of firearms is largely unconstitutional and therefore, most gun laws are an infringement on the individual’s rights to bear arms. The dominant point made by Republicans in this regard is that the Second Amendment gives the right to the individual to protect himself, his family, and his property.” While I agree with the right to protect oneself and his or her family, I would have to side with the Democrats’ stance on gun control. I think people should be able to bear arms but not every single weapon needs to be in reach. For example, according to Republican Views (2013), in 1993, Bill Clinton passed the Federal Assault Weapons Ban which banned the manufacture of semi-automatic firearms that were defined as assault weapons for civilian use. I completely agree with this law because there is simply no need for an average civilian to own an assault rifle especially now days. Assault rifles over the last two decades have gotten lighter and more powerful, and there is simply no need to them to be in the hands of inexperienced people. People worrying about protecting themselves and their property can still purchase sniper rifles, shotguns, and pistols, which do the job perfectly well. Along with protection, people also like to use guns for hunting, and a

Over the last 30 years public opinion has changed about the legalization of marijuana, mostly likely because a sizable percentage of Americans about 38% admit to having tried the drug, according to a Gallup study (Swift, 2013), approval has risen from 28% of

My party is the Democratic Party. My party would believe in the Gun Control domestic policy. The policy aims to put strict observance of law guiding acquisition and use of firearms in the United States. Possession of weapons in public spaces and within reach of many people in homes have seen incidents of unwarranted shootings and killings. Such incidents have taken place from elementary schools through to colleges. Additionally, there have been incidents of police shooting unarmed civilians hence the necessity to relook at the whole issue of gun acquisition, possession and use. Despite the fact that owning guns is an individual right because it ensures protection, those who own or posses such guns must use them without trampling on the rights of other citizens (Carroll, & Sage Publications, 2003). Also, deaths related to gun suicides constitute two-thirds of gun deaths in America. As such, the party would

The legalization of recreational marijuana is an important debate, one that could really cause drastic changes in societies. Marijuana has entered a dark stage in the pathway of legalization, and it is correlating with the prohibition stage that alcohol rested in. The debate can often reach a nasty level between individuals taking sides with the topic. Legalization of marijuana can be very beneficial under regulated circumstances, therefore making all of the negative views less important.

There has been considerable debate recently in Canada over the issue of gun control. The Canadian parliament enacted the Firearms Act to enforce gun control by requiring gun owners to register their firearms. Just recently, the government of Alberta lead in a charge, including five other provinces and numerous pro-gun groups, complaining that the law is unconstitutional and intrudes on provincial jurisdiction. They also claim that the act infringes on property and civil rights that are guaranteed in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Parliament contends that the government of Canada is within its rights to protect public safety. Pro-gun control organizations, police chiefs and the City of Toronto also back the Firearms Act.

The Canadian Liberal Government hopes to introduce legislation to legalize marijuana in 2017, but I don’t know if that is the right choice to make. Almost two out of every 10 Canadians reported having consumed marijuana in the past year, but more than 30 per cent of poll respondents said they would do so in the next year if it were legal. There are no benefits of doing this substance, so why do it! There are many side effects that marijuana can have on a person such as dizziness, lack of motivation, lung problems, etc. Hopefully, weed does not become legalized in Canada because there are many negative aspects of doing so.

Liberals say that the Second Amendment does not give people the right to keep or bear arms but for a militia or a national guard. Liberals think that people do not need a gun for protection it is the local and federal governments job to  protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military and that more gun control laws are needed to stop gun violence and this also would limit the ability for criminals to get their hand on a gun and cause more trouble than they have already caused. To sum it up liberals believe that the more guns there are the more violence there will be.   Conservatives believe the opposite of what liberals believe they believe that  the Second Amendment gives people the right to keep and bear arms. Conservatives believe that people have the right to bear arms their thinking what if someone breaks into your home and the police or any law enforcement agency cannot get there in time and the person that is being robbed has no way to defend themselves.

Marijuana is currently a hot topic of debate throughout Canada, and has been for the past few years. Marijuana was first banned in 1923 under the Opium and Drug Act, but since 1997 the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act have controlled it. In 2000, over 30,000 Canadians were charged with possession of marijuana. Currently, the marijuana laws are not enforced equally across the country, which has prompted the interest in changing the laws or possibly decriminalizing marijuana. Also, those convicted of marijuana related crimes usually don’t go to jail, but they do receive a criminal record.

A strict gun control policy has a good impact on Canada. It protects society and lower homicide rates associated with guns. Not only that, it prevents dangerous people to get guns to some extent.

Most estimates say the cannabis industry in British Columbia is alone worth $34 billion yearly. That’s about two and a half times the agriculture exports for the entire country. That’s not including the taxation and the other uses for hemp such as paper, clothing, textiles and rope. The government would see a large increase in incoming money to be used on the other social benefits canada

The Liberal Party of Canada created the policy to legalize marijuana. The Liberal Party voted for legalizing marijuana in its official manifesto before the election. The Liberal Party would like to create the policy to regulate or decriminalize the marijuana, which must be cost effective and able to keep away the marijuana drug out of the hands of young children. The other criterion for the legalization marijuana for the Liberal Party of Canada is to reduce the incarceration rates among youth. The Liberal Party also conclude that the current marijuana prohibition does not work and too many Canadians end up with the criminal record for possessing a small amount of marijuana.

Gun Control Part I:Introduction The issue of gun control and violence, both in Canada and the United States, is one that simply will not go away. If history is to be any guide, no matter what the resolution to the gun control debate is, it is probable that the arguments pro and con will be much the same as they