How To Regulate Alcohol And Tobacco Advertising

Tobacco companies advertise in magazines, promote their products in convenience stores and market their brands through websites and social networks. Many of these tobacco industries get publicity and attract more young customers when using the newly in media to promote their products. Many of these tobacco companies don’t understand that tobacco advertising is a huge public health issue that increases smoking. Tobacco company advertising and promoting is the start of the use of tobacco among teenagers. Now, these media and magazine advertisements about cigars have caused teenagers to be exposed to cigarette advertising. Not only that but also these teenagers find ads appealing and also increase their desire to smoke. Cigarette companies spent about $8.37 billion on advertising and promotional expenses in the United States in 2011.

Tobacco is the number one cause of preventable death in the United States. According to the American Lung Association in 2009, 20.6% of adults were current smokers. In 1970, the United States banned television and radio advertisements of cigarettes. Across the world countries battle similar issues in how to help prevent deaths, lower healthcare costs, and educate the population. Countries have banned advertising, posted health causes, renamed brands, and even included informational fliers in packs of cigarettes. In 2001, The Government of India decided to ban the advertising of cigarettes. This ban was created to help the youth of India and hoped to reduce the amount of future smokers. The proposal of this restriction caused debates between the government, advertising companies, and tobacco manufacturers. The supporting and dismantling arguments for these ethical and commercial causes of the ban have enabled the government to make their final decision.

Advertisements are a vital part of any company’s marketing strategy, and are used to inform or persuade an audience about a certain product or service. In fact, North American companies are among the world’s highest advertisers (Boone et al., 2010, 502). Today, an average consumer is exposed to hundreds of advertisements every day. It is when these companies attempt to promote a dangerous product that restrictions must be, and have been put in place. For several years, Canada’s regulations on tobacco advertisements have become stricter, while

The main purpose of the passage is to explain why alcoholic beverages advertising should be restricted. The passage also explains what the author thinks that alcoholic ads do not promote underage drinking Research conducted by Joel W. Grube and Lawrence Wallack suggests that awareness of TV beer commercials leads to favorable beliefs about drinking in children 10 to 12 years old and increases their intention to drink as adults. Henry Saffer concluded that a ban on broadcast alcohol advertising would save 2,000 to 3,000 people annually from death due to alcohol-related motor-vehicle crashes.

     Should tobacco advertising be restricted? This is a very controversial issue. There is the idea that young children that smoke started smoking because of advertisements, but there is also the idea that children start smoking for other reasons. Many big, well-known tobacco companies like RJ Reynolds are being sued for their advertisements. On Monday April 20th, 1998 the jury heard a testimony from Lynn Beasly, the marketing vice president of the RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. The courts believed that the advertisement was directed towards children under the age of 18, due to a document from the RJ Reynolds Board of Directors showing that they set a goal to increase the company's market share among 14

In 1992, the Australian Government passed the Tobacco Advertising Prohibition (TAP) Act and hence regulating tobacco advertising. This Act was the most recent one in the series of advertisement restriction Acts since the 1970s. According to this law, there would be no cigarette advertisement on radio and television along with all Australia newspapers and magazines as well.

Cigarette advertising has changed throughout history from how it has been advertised, what is being advertised, and who the intended audience is. In the 60’s seeing a cigarette advertisement in the Sunday paper would just be like any other advertisement, but recent generations would be appalled to see such a gruesome product being publicized. The annual deaths from smoking cigarettes are increasing each year and doctors and scientist are teaming together to try and help prevent more. Realizing that advertising may be playing a role the controversy over cigarette advertising has lead to the censoring of harmful products in other public advertising which still has a lasting effect today.

Passage two focus is on personal actions. Alcohol ads are not forcing underage drinkers to pick up a drink, it is their choice to do so. They already observe their role models and favorite celebrity, pick up an alcohol beverage and drink it. Already in a teen mind, if they see their favorite actor do it, they want to feel ‘cool’ doing it also. Alcohol ads are under the same freedom as everyone else, freedom of speech in the Constitution. This is a reasonable support that they are not trying to condone underage drinking, however, they will not take the blame of underage drinking. They feel as though lawyers are on a case putting an end to drinking, while tobacco consumers are uprising. Passage two believes, alcohol publicity is identical with

Alcohol is and will continue being a part of our society so we need to develop an educated attitude to it. Simply banning commercials due to there being a risk is not a solution. What the advertisers are doing is trying to influence adults to drink their brand, not young people. I do believe commercials and alcohol advertising can be extremely damaging to young people who use these messages to form their relationship with alcohol. Without alcohol sponsorship, supporters of many sporting events and music concerts/festivals would find it much more difficult to afford events. My suggestion to help curb the topic of banning or not banning alcohol commercials is to allow companies promote their brand during certain hours throughout the

Advertisements, they grab your attention and keep it. Of course, they are made for the working class who can spend their money to buy the product however, children can also be targeted by ads. According to the online news company Cracked the average American child watches 16,000 ads every year on TV alone, and in the U.S “children spend $30 billion annually and they directly influence an additional $250 billion in family spending.” The scary part is the advertisement industry is self-regulating and there are barely any restrictions! The Tabaco companies are in a massive industry worldwide and you can find Cigarette ads all around you. If you look closer next time you’re at a gas station or a quick-stop store, you’ll see an ad for cigarettes.

Advertising plays significant role to communicate a message to society. The main goal of advertising is to influence the beliefs of people about their use of products. However, advertising has both advantages and disadvantages. The debate of alcoholic advertising remains the most controversial issue to discuss. Both Leiber and Levy discuss over the power of alcoholic advertising either it should be restricted or not.

It’s clear that the sole purpose of advertising is to inform the viewers about their product for the targeted audience to purchase that product. While this may be true for most commercials and advertisements the FDA has devoted billions of dollars to prevent the purchase of only one product, tobacco. Are you aware that everyday, nearly forty thousand teens in the U.S smoke their first cigarette while one thousand start smoking daily? If you weren’t aware, this is precisely why the FDA created the tobacco prevention campaign known as ‘‘The Real Cost’’. The Real Cost discourages future smokers through anti-smoking advertisements which show the harmful affects of smoking tobacco to raise awareness. According to www.fda.gov ‘‘Initial campaign advertising

Why would the government legalize something this toxic horrifying and deadly? Maybe because they benefit from it. The government and people’s excuses for legalizing tobacco is that is freedom and choice and that they choose their own fate. Yes that maybe true, but second-hand smoke also does harm on people as well. In the U.S., 3,000 people die each year from secondhand smoke-related lung cancer.

Exposure to alcohol advertising is an everyday occurrence. Alcohol advertising is persuasive not only to adults but to those who are too young to buy alcohol legally. Although parents and peers have a large impact on youth decisions to drink, marketing also has a significant impact by influencing the attitudes of parents and peers and helping to create an environment that promotes underage drinking. Alcohol companies focus billions of dollars on advertising their products and still claim that the effect is minimal. I pose a few questions that are; who are the targets of alcohol advertising? How does alcohol advertising affect the people targeted by alcohol companies? Finally what actions are being taken to

We may see alcohol and tobacco advertisements everywhere, on television, in newspaper, on street ads card etc. Alcohol ads usually create several feints to tell people that alcohol is good for people and induce people to drink. On the other hand, the malign influence of advertisements shows smoking as something "cool".