How To Treat The Anuak

The deposition of their land, involvement in violent conflict and exposure to new diseases, resulted in the death of a vast number of Indigenous people. For the small population that did survive through this period of time, their lives were irreversibly changed, forever

Nations of dependent Indians, against their will, under color of law, are driven from their homes into the wilderness. You cannot explain it; you cannot reason it away.... Our friends will view this measure with sorrow, and our enemies alone

What would you do if someone came to your home unexpectedly, and told you that you had to move whether you want to or not? That was the case for some Native Americans during the time of the Indian Removal Act. This act basically says that the Native Americans would be granted land, in exchange for their home territory, but many Native Americans disagreed with this act. The Indian Removal act that took place in 1830 was not justified, because the Cherokee tribe had to move even though the majority of them haven’t agreed to move, the Cherokee tribe helped the United States during the war of 1812, and the Americans treated the Native Americans unfair.

Ethiopia is a country that creates image of starving. In 1980, many countries of east Africa had drought, and political unrest so people displaced from their shelter to camping, In addition when people moves to other place from their village or town, due to civil war, it is hard to produce crops or grain for food. Therefore those all causes refuges who lives in camps specifically in Ethiopia in 1980. During that time Ethiopia asked aid for the United Nations so the united nation were showing to the world about Ethiopian famine so that it could get assistance from the world. European countries and America assisted to Ethiopia to receive food, medicine, and other material. While Ethiopian economic is growing fast in the world by 10.3 per year

Even though the U.S. got more land from the Indian Removal Act and gave the Indians a new home with covered expenses it was a downcast for many Native tribes and a miserable event throughout history. In the writing of John G. Burnett’s Story of the Cherokees, he discusses how terrible and sad the removal of the Indians were and how it negatively affected the Indians. Specifically, “Woman were dragged from their homes”(2),”Children were often separated from parents, with the sky for a blanket and the earth as a pillow.”(2) In general, all of the Indians and even the women and kids were treated horrible as if they were seen as savages, and as if they were animals. Although, when being treated like savages, were the Indians the true savages or

Likewise, when the Na’vi refused to leave and instead wanted to fight, the humans forced them to. They did this by setting Hometree on fire and using deadly gas to force them out. Like the Cherokees, an immense number of their people were killed trying to escape.

Throughout the process of colonization, the Native people in Chinua Achebe’s novel Things Fall Apart, Silas Hagerty’s documentary Dakotah 38, and Phillip Noyce’s film Rabbit-Proof Fence, all cope with the on going struggles of being colonized against their will. All three of these sources tell their own, different stories about their same struggles. In both Things Fall Apart and Dakotah 38, the colonizing people create a sense of doubt in the Natives’ cultures; whereas in Rabbit-Proof Fence, the people fight to hold their beliefs by continuing to practice their own traditions.

The day the colonists first set foot on American soil marked the beginning of an arduous struggle for Native Americans. When the colonists first arrived, there were ten million Native Americans; over the next three centuries, over 90% of the entire population was wiped out due to the white man. The removal of Native Americans marks a humiliating period of United States history. President Andrew Jackson attempted to consolidate the Native Americans when he told them “‘circumstances render it impossible that [they could] flourish in the midst of a civilized community. [They] have but one remedy within [their] reach, and that is to remove to the west. And the sooner [they] do this, the sooner [they] will commence your career of improvement and prosperity.’” In contrast to Jackson’s justification for removal, historians such as Charles Hudson describe removal as a “‘gentle, almost antiseptic word for one of the harshest, most crudely opportunistic acts in American history.’” A number of American people were opposed to removal, the most notorious of which included newspaper editor Noh-Noh-He-Tsu-Nageh. Author Walter T. Durham seeks to illustrate the abdominal nature of Cherokee Removal in his article "Noh-Noh-He-Tsu-Nageh and the Cherokee Removal” through Noh-Noh-He-Tsu’s personal accounts and through the flaws of the various treaties signed with the Native Americans.

One tribe, the Shoshone, were promised “everything necessary to comfortable living” in exchange for fulfilling their side of the Indian Removal act [Document 8]. They remained civil even when adjusting from originally thriving in “every foot of what you proudly call America” to being “content with the little patch allowed”. They were originally promised seed, farming tools, food, and cattle during the arrangement, but the United States did not carry out their side of the bargain; killing their game, stealing their furs, and using the Shoshone meadows to feed their

The Native Americans felt betrayed by the American people. After all the work and effort to help the white man through means of trade, the Native Americans were now being forcibly removed from their homes and made to move to the other side of the Mississippi River, hundreds of miles away. The Choctaw tribe was told that they needed to choose quickly between “surrendering tribal sovereignty and removing to the west.” (Davis, 67) They were told that if they moved peacefully, they would receive rations and provisions; however, if they decided to stay-

Many of the Native tribes of the time met the resulting dismissal of their rights as landowners and citizens with confusion, disbelief, anger

The Native Americans were forced to move out of their territory that they lived in before the Americans came. Jackson forced them to move west of the Mississippi River. One tribe, the Cherokee, tried to not be removed by adapting to the Americans culture. Jackson took this to court in a case called Worchester V. Georgia. The court ruled that the Cherokee could stay, but Jackson ignored this and made them move. They had to walk 800 miles to the new territory, which was called the Trail of Tears. Almost one fourth of the 18,000 Cherokee died. “By persuasion and force they have been made to retire from river to river and from mountain to mountain, until some of the tribes have become extinct and others have left but remnants,” was said in source #3. Jackson caused pain and suffering to the Native

Not knowing how to cultivate the land or domesticate animals, the Cherokee at a standstill. The Whites, who knew how to cultivate the land and domesticate animals, would have been able to utilize the land to its fullest potential instead of withering away precious resources. The Whites tried various methods to persuade the Cherokee to part with their land, but they refused and were frequently abused. “… we have come to the conclusion that this nation cannot be reinstated in its present location, and that the question left to us and to every Cherokee, is, whether it is more desirable to remain here, with all the embarrassments with which we must be surrounded, or to seek a country where we may enjoy our own laws, and live under our own vine and fig-tree.” If the Cherokee had agreed to relocate further west, they would not have had to go through adversity. The Whites would have left them alone, free to create their own laws and free to do what they wanted. The Cherokee pushed their source of food westward leaving a shortage of deer and buffalo and they did not have the knowledge or resources to cultivate the land. Due to these facts, they were not self-sufficient and would not have been able to survive using their outdated methods of living. Compared to the Whites, the Cherokee population was miniscule, spread across a vast amount of land. “The

In the early 2000's the World Bank supplied $4.2 billion dollars to a project entitled the "Chad-Cameroon oil pipeline to the Atlantic Ocean." The goal of the project was to provide Chad an opportunity to grow its infrastructure and provide the economy with jobs. The project was done under the agreement that the money would be spent on improving Chad as a country with international supervisions. The negative outcomes of this were a misuse of the money. In 2005 the president of Chad declared the oil money would be used to fund the general budget of the country and to purchase weapons. This was rather unfortunate and unproductive for the country and hindered the overall goal of this project.

Their Global Development branch is the newest and smallest of three, having donated just under $30 million in grants to the cause. The initiative focuses on education and infrastructure in underprivileged nations. The first grant was issue in May, 2006; $1.2 million was given to the University of Maryland to help evaluate and improve vaccines by studying various diseases of young children in third world countries. The most recent grant was $15 million to Columbia University’s Earth Institute, whose goal is “Mobilizing the Sciences and Public Policy to Build a Prosperous and Sustainable Future.” 2 Another notable grant is almost $10 million across five years to help increase access to safe water and promote better hygiene in Kenya through stimulating an existing school-based education program.