A Summary of Koji Frahm’s “How to Write an A Paper” In Koji Frahm’s “How to Write an A Paper,” Frahm uses satire to list all of the essential components needed to write an A Paper. Frahm’s entire essay is essentially what not to do when writing a paper. He starts with sarcastically explaining exactly what not to do in an introductory paragraph. Don’t attempt to be intelligent in order to confuse your reader, don’t be short, don’t be vague. Next, Frahm stresses the importance of a thesis statement. He goes on to warn against choppy, sudden transitions but rather indirectly explains that paragraphs should be smooth and transitional. In reference to the body paragraphs, Frahm states that many big points are not necessary, but rather that one main point is all the writer needs. He is obviously meaning the exact opposite of this. Other points that Frahm makes include not saying the same thing repeatedly, not writing uncommon words, not using unneeded metaphors and not making errors. He concludes by saying how a writer’s conclusion should include a quote and some affectionate problem with society. Frahm describes many of the …show more content…
She comically writes about her struggles with the inner critics telling her their opinions on her writing. Lamott advises that in order to get to a well written final draft, it is imperative to silence inner critics in order to begin the writing process. Lamott uses her own experience as a food critic to describe how she would attempt to begin her writing process but could not produce anything useful. She then shares her key to overcoming this block: to just start writing. Lamott’s entire essay is focused on this idea. She explains that her own first drafts are absolutely horrible, but they end up providing her with some basis for her final
In the essay “Shitty First Drafts”, Anne Lamott addresses aspiring writers on the subject of the dreaded first draft. Lamott uses a disarmingly humorous tone to illustrate the value of putting pen to paper and writing shitty first drafts. Lamott goes on to say, “The first draft is the child’s draft, where you let it all pour out… knowing that no one is going to see it and that you can shape it later” (234). The essay successfully delivers this message by use of its light and conversational tone. This amicability aids the essay by allowing the precise communication of the author’s ideas, by portraying the author personably and empathetically, and by allowing the author to finally advise from a place of authority and practicality.
She begins by pointing out that writing is not an easy process with a clear path; according to Anne it is something that almost everyone, even professional writers, struggle with. She explains that the only way she can begin to write is with horrible first drafts because they are private, can be written more loosely than typical essays, and can lead to a more defined
Reading the two articles, Anne Lamott’s “Shitty First Drafts” and Donald M. Murray’s “Write Before Writing” numerous times made me realize a connection with their writing process that I can relate to. Lamott believes that every good writer, or every writer should write shitty first drafts because the writer will produce better second drafts. In her article, she gives examples of her writing struggles and gives her point of view of the writing process. In order to have a good piece of writing, one must write all of their ideas onto paper. Murray’s article gives some instructions on how to create and start a better writing. He expressed that writers should give time to what they’re going to write about, so that they can understand and make it easy on themselves. After reading the articles, I realized some of the complications I suffer within my writing process, but one strategy that I found helpful is Lamott’s drafting development strategies.
Everyone knows what writing is to one extent or another, but we all have different definitions of how it should be done and varying degrees of seriousness about the art. We all have a process of writing, but each is unique to ourselves and our own experiences. Annie Dillard and Stephen King are two well known authors who have published many pieces, two of which describe how they view the writing process and let their readers get a peek of what goes on through their minds when they write. These two pieces are Dillard’s The Writing Life and King’s “What Writing Is.”
She also talks about when she used to write food reviews for California magazine. During this time she explains the discipline she used to write. She explains her struggles for writing a review every month. Lamott writes about how she would make herself sit at her desk every Monday to write her "shitty first draft". Because she used that discipline, she ended up with great writing. She dedicated that time to just writing, no matter how bad the writing was. Lamott tells the readers what she thinks is the best way to start writing, "Just get it all down on paper, because there may be something great in those six crazy pages that you would have never gotten to by more rational, grown-up means" (23). This showcases the discipline a writer must use to at least put something down on paper. What the person writes during this stage could be absolute garbage, but they wrote something and there might be something useful in it. This is a good discipline exercise for novices or experts. These writers write to both. At the beginning of Johnston's introduction, he mostly writes to beginners. He writes, "Truth be told, I'm not at all sure that writing can be
First of all, the essay is very relatable because of the topic. Writing is tough, no doubt about it. Everyone will struggle at one point while writing an essay, paper, article, book, or whatever it may be. Anne Lamott realizes this, which spurred her on to trying to help audiences to begin their work. First drafts, as Lamott says, is “the child’s draft,” or where all someone’s inner thoughts may pour out onto the paper (221). Whenever a person starts a new writing, thousands of thoughts and words are echoing through their heads. Not knowing where to begin or what to first write down, Lamott relates to her writers by experiencing similar feelings. First drafts remain an essential starting aspect of the writing process. Audiences who read Lamott’s essay will recognize aspects which are relatable to every
1. At the beginning of the essay Merrill seems to be a bit bashful about poor writing. But Merrill also uses “Poor” and “Principle” in his title “The Principle of Poor Writing.” This irony shows that it can be a negative or positive. Another example of Merrill using irony can be found on page 428 “Many scientists actually do write poorly, but they probably perform by ear without perceiving clearly how their results are achieved.” Merrill’s title, introduction or advice did not tip me off because many people in today’s society do struggle with writing.
Anne Lamott’s “Shitty First Drafts” presents an argument to eliminate the understanding that writers create a masterpiece on their first drafts. The first draft is simply the first attempt that writers create to turn their thoughts into a final paper. Lamott tries to convince the “uninitiated” that everyone writes “shitty first drafts” and often times, positive outcomes come from those first attempts. One of the biggest obstacle in writing is the fear of creating terrible paper and many writers do not realize that this is actually the most important part to a good article. Lamott provided an effective rhetorical situation because of her persuasive appeals and structure.
This article is about Richard Marius and the processes he uses in his own writings. He expresses the importance of starting with just a list, committing yourself completely to the project at hand, writing numerous rough drafts, and many other guidelines that can contribute to the process of effective writing.
Whether while writing an essay or a birthday card, we have all struggled to find the proper words to illustrate our thoughts or feelings from time to time. Upholding the occupation of a writer would multiply that struggle tenfold. An occupation that depends on interesting, fluid pieces of writing every submission requires an adequate number of attempts and patience. Lamott expresses that writers “all often feel like we are pulling teeth” (Lamott), which proves the difficulty of writing is still there no matter the level of writer behind the work. Lamott also emphasizes that a writer “has to start somewhere” and shares her friend’s ideas in her writing to simply “get something - anything - down on paper” (Lamott). Lamott, and the other writers mentioned in this piece, carry incredible track records, while still admitting that perfection did not come initially, or even easily. Thus, proving that the Shitty First Draft has a place in any writer’s notebook or Word document. Lamott’s admission to struggling to properly begin a piece of writing surprised me, given of her success. I could not imagine a woman of her accomplishments stressing out over a food review, yet I felt relieved that someone of Lamott’s title relates to an amateur writer like myself. I often put off my writing as well when I cannot articulate a proper introduction. I do every other possible homework, or shy away from homework in general because the
Lamott compares the process of writing with the painful process of pulling the teeth. She believes that in order to produce a high quality writing, the author must first put together all their ideas and thoughts in form of the “child draft”. This draft determines the flow and dimension
“Shitty First Drafts” by Anne Lamott, is a hilarious must read for junior high school students and any other aspiring writers. Her essay inspires comfort and confidence in writing a first draft. It concretes that all writers experience the “shitty” first draft. Anne Lamott wrote this instructional information in 1995, but it is timeless information. She blows the idea of writing an immaculate first draft out of the water. Anne supports the idea that bad first drafts will almost always lead to better second, third and final drafts. She symbolizes the first draft to be like a child. Where you put all your thoughts and emotions out there in words on paper, you go all over the place, you say all kinds of ridiculous things, and all with the
The standard impression most people have of writers is that they can sit down and just let a perfect composition flow from their heads onto paper. In her writing career, Lamott has observed how “writing is not rapturous. In
I totally agree with what the author is saying in the text. It takes time to get a good product out even though we think some people are deep and wonderful they still have the same struggles that we have when it comes to writing. I like this text because it is realistic it is giving an account of first drafts from common day people and shows how it is even for professional writers have problems with. This point is important because as people we sometimes feel we are not as good or capable of doing something not realizing that the people we look up to have the same problems we do. Another point that I agree with the author on is that you have to start somewhere. Many times as writers we don’t know where to start when it comes to writing. That being said we will just sit and think for ten twenty minutes when we could've just been information on the paper and then editing it later. In addition I liked that the author used examples from his professional experience when it came to writing food reviews. By him using details like how he went to the restaurant and sat down with friends and took notes of what was said. This was good to me because it helps me connect with him and the things that he does to write his reviews.
The author lists a few tips that can assist in writing a better paper. I am going to note the select few that I found helpful. First, the author states to avoid obvious content, if your arguments comes easy to mind it could also come easy to the mind of several of your other class mates. It is best to